princessredtights
Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 535
how much is BTM making off the donations?
Why do you care? Do you think that the candidates are all too stupid to cut a fair deal, that Trevor is actually Svengali ?
The money doesn't go through BTM. The individual campaigns are responsible for paying him at the end of it all. They stand to get ripped off, not us.
why do I care where how my donation is being spent is what you are asking?![]()
why do I care where how my donation is being spent is what you are asking?![]()
Did someone in your family mentally abuse you? Did you have parents that yelled at you a lot or hit you? Do they still?
I'm actually being very serious.
What donation would that be?
If you don't trust your candidate to invest your money properly, then perhaps you should find a better candidate.
Are you a paid spammer from BTM?
so that this is the type of transparency BTM and these "freedom candidates" support? Ask a very simple, easy to answer question, so I can make a well informed donation, and this is what you get. And you all are wondering why this money bomb is a huge failure.
Transparency worked so well with the delegate selections I can't believe you're still naive enough to believe it's a good idea to share intimate details on the internet.
It event isn't a failure as far as I am concerned, because we have more money this evening than we had this morning. No thanks to you, of course.
Do you really think that libertarian leaning candidates should never have paid staffers? Do you really think that those volunteers should never develop enough skills to earn a living out of it?
Let me assure you that I am absolutely thrilled to know that people like Trevor are willing to risk their entire lives to continue working with the Revolution.
Are you a paid spammer from BTM?
No I'm not. Now I've answered your question.. so are you a victim of abuse? I take a bit of an angry tone with you in some of my posts- because it's so easy to do with you - but I actually do think you have been abused. I think it's obvious.. and even though I think you're extremely misguided I do feel sorry for you.
Are you a paid spammer from BTM?
No I'm not. Now I've answered your question.. so are you a victim of abuse? I take a bit of an angry tone with you in some of my posts- because it's so easy to do with you - but I actually do think you have been abused. I think it's obvious.. and even though I think you're extremely misguided I do feel sorry for you.
never been hit, never been abused. no need to feel sorry. Im sorry if you get upset when people ask questions.
never been hit, never been abused. no need to feel sorry. Im sorry if you get upset when people ask questions.
I don't get upset when people ask questions. No need to feel sorry for me. For the record I think you're lying. I think you an abuse victim.
I don't get upset when people ask questions. No need to feel sorry for me. For the record I think you're lying. I think you an abuse victim.
lol ok. I never even got spanked as a child. I would not slander my parents any further, its against board rules.
lol ok. I never even got spanked as a child. I would not slander my parents any further, its against board rules.
Well IF you are telling the truth.. it must be a chemical imbalance or something.
Did someone in your family mentally abuse you? Did you have parents that yelled at you a lot or hit you? Do they still?
I'm actually being very serious.
In my eyes the greatest value we received for raising $4.3 million dollars for Ron Paul was in the publicity we received, not the fact that the campaign had the money. I think most would agree with me and this is due to the fact that we received what I would estimate to be well over $10 million in publicity for the event.
On November 5th we had about 36,000 donors pull together to raise $4.3 million dollars. Then on December 16th we beat our record by bringing about 67,000 donors together to raise over $6 million dollars. But, to our dismay we barely got any publicity for the second money bomb event. At that point I thought it would be good strategy to try to show our numbers. If you'll remember we were fighting the "he can't win syndrome" that was raining down in full force on our efforts. Raising a large amount of money was great, but it hadn't been enough to convince a person on the street that we had large numbers and the he COULD win. The only thing that we could do that was different, that stood a chance of gaining massive publicity, and would help us convince those who liked Ron Paul but thought he was a wasted vote, would be to have over 100,000 people donate on the same day. Even that wasn't going to be a cure all but in my mind it was a move in the right direction. It would be a huge morale booster and would give fresh ammo to our argument and cause.
There were other factors as well. 1.) We had just underperformed in the NH primary which hurt morale. 2.) a lot of people were writing me telling me they were very upset there was no recount and that they wouldn't donate again. 3.) Many supporters had depleted their funds with two huge money bombs 4.) no publicity from December 16th meaning less motivation going forward.. and so on. So, I thought it would much easier for us to go with a lower minimum number so that everyone could participate. The pledge was for $10 or more so I thought we could certainly raise millions of dollars as well.