Adverse effects of polio vaccines

[Firestarter]

Our wonderful media are reporting that the World Health Organization admits that a new polio “outbreak” in Sudan is linked to a vaccine-campaign in Chad.
This supposed “outbreak” in Sudan consists of a total of 2 children...

That’s a week after the U.N. health agency declared Africa “free of wild polio”.
“Wild polio” remains endemic in Afghanistan and Pakistan; with both countries battling outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio: https://www.theguardian.com/global-...-spreads-in-africa-after-defeat-of-wild-virus


Whatever you think of polio or vaccines, the real question should be how to decrease the rate of paralysis, which according to our wonderful media in most cases isn’t even caused by the polio virus!

From 2000 to 2017, as many as 491,000 children in India were afflicted by non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). A percentage of the children who suffered from NPAFP died.
NPAFP is described as “clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly”.

The tragic story starts in the late 1980s, when the campaign to eradicate poliomyelitis (polio) was started.
At that time there were 350,000 cases in around 125 countries, with (only) 1 in 200 infections leading to irreversible paralysis and from those who suffered paralysis, 5 to 10% died (less than 1 in 2000 infected by polio).

At around the same time the campaign to poison children in India with the oral polio vaccine was started; the number of cases of NPAFP started increasing. The number of NPAFP cases first increased and then the extra NPAFP cases decreased.
A scientist concluded, “Our findings suggest that increase in NPAFP was indeed an adverse effect of the pulse polio immunization programme”.

In around 2005, the number of cases of NPAFP started increasing even more rapidly.
I don’t think that it’s a coincidence that this was at around the same time that the “high-potency monovalent vaccine” was introduced to poison innocent children: https://www.thenewleam.com/2020/05/perils-of-handing-over-public-health-to-private-profit/
(https://archive.is/GtGYb)

 

[Firestarter]

The following scientific-looking article shows a correlation between the number of polio vaccines in India and "non-polio acute flaccid paralysis" (NPAFP).


See the following 2 figures...

Figure 1. Non-polio AFP over the years in the state of UP alongside the 5-year cumulative doses of OPV. npafp_rate: Non-polio acute flaccid paralysis rate; Num_doses: Number of pulse polio rounds; CD5: Cumulative doses in the past 5 years.

Figure 2. Non-polio AFP over the years in the state of Bihar alongside the 5-year cumulative doses of OPV.


And see the following excerpts.

The last case of polio from India was reported in 2011. That year, the non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) rate in India was 13.35/100,000, where the expected rate is 1⁻2/100,000. A previous study of data from 2000 to 2010 has detailed the NPAFP rate in a state correlated with the pulse polio rounds conducted there, and the strongest correlation with the NPAFP rate was found when the number of doses from the previous 4 years were used. However, a simple association being found with regression analysis does not prove a causal relationship.
After publication of those findings, as the threat of polio had lessened, the number of rounds of OPV administration was brought down. The present study has been done to look at data till the end of 2017, to see if the incidence of NPAFP declined with this reduction in polio immunization rounds.
(...)

Analysis of data over 10 years (from 2000 to 2010) showed that the NPAFP rate increased nationally during this time [12]. The NPAFP rate in 2010 was 12/100,000, which was some way away from the expected number of 2/100,000. It has been reported that in 2005 there was a sharp increase in the national NPAFP rate, which coincided with the introduction of a high-potency monovalent vaccine that contained 5 times the number of Type 1 viruses, compared to that contained in the previously used vaccine [13]. The NPAFP rate, which was 3.11/100,000 in 2004, more than doubled (to 6.43/100,000) in 2005.
(...)

From the results, the NPAFP rate has been shown to decline with a reduction in the pulse polio doses. This response to de-challenging adds weight to the likelihood of there being a causative association with OPV vaccinations.

.

Rachana Dhiman et al. - Correlation between non-polio acute flaccid paralysis rates with pulse polio frequency in India (2018)
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1755/htm
(http://web.archive.org/web/20210222031309/https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/8/1755/htm)

 

[merkelstan]

Terribly complicated subject to sort out when you have an interplay of multiple possible causes. There's a high correlation between cumulative doses and the npafp rate. I've forgotten most of my stats, but their correlation (P value) does look significant

 

[Firestarter]

The following video makes a strong case that the CDC will sweep the Guillain Barre Syndrome adverse effects from the COVID vaccines under the rug by rediagnosing these as Accute Flaccid Mylitis (caused by a poliovirus).

They could even stage a new polio epidemic to cover up the adverse effects from the COVID vaccines (I doubt this as this would mean finally admitting that the polio vaccines don't work).
I can guess that the proposed "solution" will once again be - more vaccines.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/cdc-...ions-hugo-talks-lockdown_pXcKgXAaC1hTTUK.html

 

[RJB]

A cousin of mine developed Bell's Palsy the day after his second jab.

An uncle developed shingles. He told his doctor and the doctor said that was very common. My uncle asked why no one told him (besides the whacko cospiracy theorists in his family) and the doc shrugged it off.

 

[donnay]

A cousin of mine developed Bell's Palsy the day after his second jab.

An uncle developed shingles. He told his doctor and the doctor said that was very common. My uncle asked why no one told him (besides the whacko cospiracy theorists in his family) and the doc shrugged it off.

I got shingles five days after my boss got a shingles vaccine--the people who are superspreaders are the ones that get the jabs!

 

[RJB]

I got shingles five days after my boss got a shingles vaccine--the people who are superspreaders are the ones that get the jabs!

I apologize for my post in this thread. For some reason, I misread it and thought it was a covid thread rather than a polio thread, been a busy day.

 

[Firestarter]

An uncle developed shingles. He told his doctor and the doctor said that was very common. My uncle asked why no one told him (besides the whacko cospiracy theorists in his family) and the doc shrugged it off.

I got shingles five days after my boss got a shingles vaccine--the people who are superspreaders are the ones that get the jabs!

Those antivaxxers are really, really horrible!
Thinking that it can't be a coincidence if somebody develops a terrible disease shortly after vaccination...


I have posted about shingles (a.k.a. HZ) caused by the dangerous COVID vaccines in another thread...

Here's information on the officially reported HZ cases after COVID vaccination.

the European EudraVigilance database had reported 4103 cases of HZ after receiving tozinameran, accounting for 1.3% of total reported events following this vaccination (http://www.adrreports.eu [accessed July 27, 2021]). For mRNA-1273 (the Moderna vaccine), 590 (0.7%) cases had been reported, for CHADOX1 NCOV-19 (the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine) 2143 (0.6%) cases, and for AD26.COV2.S (the Janssen vaccine) 59 cases (0.3%).
The United States Vaccine Adverse Event Report System (VAERS) reported 2512 HZ cases (1.3% of total reported events) after tozinameran, 1763 (0.9%) after mRNA-1273, and 302 (0.7%) after AD26.COV2.S (https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html [accessed July 27, 2021]).
The Dutch pharmacovigilance center Lareb reported 300 cases (0.8% of total reported events) after vaccination with tozinameran

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ncy-cover-up&p=7063457&viewfull=1#post7063457

 

[Firestarter]

The same Jonas Salk that has been credited with inventing the first polio vaccines that caused so many deaths, is another eugenics psychopath. He explained his views on overpopulation and the need for culling the herd in his 1973 book The survival of the wisest.
In Salk's utopian view, only the "wisest" that accept "evolution" (or "science" in general), will survive, while the disobedient lower class will die off.

Salk argues for depopulation by direct intervention.
Salk claims that "anti-life, genocide" is a necessary aspect of human evolution

that which was, and is, anti-life, expressed in genocide, is as much an evolutionary phenomenon as what is here thought of as a new ethic and a new morality on the basis of which Man's future survival as a species and as an individual is dependent.

.
Salk preached for new forms of morality to rid the world of "useless eaters", or in Jonas Salk's words, "'polluters', who befoul the planet":

A major threat to the species is attributed to the increasing size of the human population, which, in turn, is ascribed to successes in science and technology. This "explanation" has evoked an attack upon science and the exploitation of its technology, to the development of which are attributed many adverse effects upon the human species and upon other forms of life.
"Polluters" who befoul the planet affect the "quality of life" and are regarded as a threat to the present and future equilibrium of the species and of the planet. Those who consider themselves on the side of Nature, and therefore of the human species, see others in opposition to both Nature and Man. Hence we are to be concerned not only with Man's relationship to Nature but with Man's relationship to himself.

.
He explains how scientists could disrupt human genes through RNA viruses (or of course mRNA or DNA vaccines):

Biologists have discovered many ways in Nature of acquiring such information and of producing new combinations. For example, sexual reproduction, which results in new mixtures of inheritable information, may be seen as a producer of "mutations" in the sense implied above.
"Mutations," as here defined, would also be produced by the introduction, either naturally or experimental, of a virus into a sperm or egg cell, the genetic information of which would then be incorporated in either the DNA or the RNA and transmitted. Such new information might be advantageous or disadvantages.
Nevertheless, it would be transmitted hereditarily, having become part of the organism, whose survival value would then be tested in the process of natural selection.

.
If the mRNA vaccines sterilise women, arguably it's true that only the "wisest" families, that refuse the jab, will survive?!?
https://fakeotube.com/video/4159/20...-apos-was-into-eugenics-and-depopulation-_360
https://www.gardenofgreatwork.org/post/book-review-the-survival-of-the-wisest-by-jonas-salk


For more on sterilisation vaccines: Does-COVID-19-vaccine-cause-infertility