Adverse effects of polio vaccines

Dr. Paul knows from personal experience that this is blatantly false.

How many polio vaccines did Dr. Paul administer during his practice?

Dr. Humphries, a nephrologist (kidney doctor) administered vaccines in her practice until she saw some of the negative effects some vaccines had on some patients with kidney problems.

She was not anti-vaccine.

She was pro-patient and pro-individualized medicine.

When she could not practice medicine in the best interest of the patient and was persecuted for not following a one-size-fits all approach to medicine, she left her practice.

THE “DISAPPEARANCE” OF POLIO by Dr. Humphries.
 
How many polio vaccines did Dr. Paul administer during his practice?

Dr. Humphries, a nephrologist (kidney doctor) administered vaccines in her practice until she saw some of the negative effects some vaccines had on some patients with kidney problems.

She was not anti-vaccine.

She was pro-patient and pro-individualized medicine.

When she could not practice medicine in the best interest of the patient and was persecuted for not following a one-size-fits all approach to medicine, she left her practice.

THE “DISAPPEARANCE” OF POLIO by Dr. Humphries.

Nephrologists don't administer vaccines. Ron Paul was a family practitioner and OB GYN. They do. How many? You would have to ask him. She would have had no call to give a polio vaccination in her line of work.

https://www.davita.com/kidney-disease/overview/treatment-overview/what-is-a-nephrologist?/e/6884

What does a nephrologist do?

A nephrologist generally sees patients who are referred by their primary care physicians or general physicians for problems related to the kidneys, high blood pressure or certain types of metabolic disorders. If someone feels they are having problems with their kidneys, they can seek out the care of a nephrologist. When a kidney doctor first meets with a patient, he or she will usually go over the patient’s medical history and do a complete physical.

A nephrologist will then do blood and urine tests to determine how well the patient’s kidneys are functioning. He or she may also order a kidney ultrasound. When necessary, a nephrologist may perform a kidney biopsy in order to better determine what is wrong with the kidneys. However, a nephrologist is not a surgeon and typically does not perform operations. Treatment of kidney cancer, prostate operations and removal of kidney stones are usually handled by a different type of physician known as a urologist.

If a nephrologist finds that a patient’s kidneys are not functioning as they should, he or she will help diagnose the cause and prescribe a treatment plan. If a kidney doctor detects kidney disease, he or she will do tests to determine what stage of kidney disease the patient is in and plan the patient’s treatment. The nephrologist will usually refer the patient to a renal dietitian, renal social worker and renal nurse who will help with the patient’s care. If the patient needs dialysis or a kidney transplant, his or her kidney doctor will discuss the different types of dialysis or refer the patient to a transplant center.

Who should see a nephrologist?

A person may be referred to a kidney doctor if he or she is experiencing:

Acute renal failure
Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease
Accelerated decline in kidney function
Chronic urinary tract infections
Repeat urinary tract infections
High blood pressure that does not respond to medication
A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 or lower
Repeat kidney stones
Blood loss in the urine
Protein loss in the urine
 
Last edited:
Nephrologists don't administer vaccines.

Dr. Humphries did, both in her residencies as well as in her practice in a hospital, where she was required to do so.



The interviewer then reveals how Dr. Humphries has been a doctor for a long time, and that she used to not only believe in vaccines, but she used to give them. So she asks Dr. Humphries what she learned in her research to make her change her mind.

Dr. Humphries then explains that she was motivated to research vaccines and learn the truth, because her medical training had misinformed her. She also saw friends and family members injured by vaccines.

When the interviewer asks her if she felt betrayed when she learned the truth about vaccines, much of which was suppressed in her medical training, Dr. Humphries gives a rather incredible response. If anyone has wondered what Dr. Humphries motivation is, or what kind of character she has, this reply is very revealing:

Well, I take responsibility for what I have done in my life. And so if somebody made me go to medical school and kept everything away from me, maybe I would feel betrayed. But I chose to go to medical school, and I chose to limit my reading material to the degree that I did. So I didn’t feel betrayed.

Source.
 
Ron Paul gave then out on a regular basis in his family practice. He has far more experience with vaccines than she does.]

Prove it.

Former Rep. Ron Paul said during his presidential run that "people have had some very, very serious reactions" from vaccines, and Paul is a member of a physicians' group that espouses the belief that vaccines can cause autism.

Source: CNN
 
Dr. Humphries gives clear examples where the data supports just the opposite, that in certain cases disease rates went down after vaccines were stopped.

Her example of smallpox vaccine in Leicester England not being effective dates from the 1800's. Much has been learned about vaccines since that time. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/...vaccinators-personal-belief-exemption/398321/

She has nothing current?

The dewy chill over Leicester, England, in March 1885 did not deter thousands of protesters from gathering outside nearby York Castle to protest the imprisonment of seven activists. Organizers claimed as many as 100,000 people attended, although historians estimate it was closer to 20,000.

The cause they rallied against? Vaccination.

This movement has faded from popular memory, obscured by the controversy of more recent anti-vaccination efforts, which gained momentum in the 1990s. However, the effects of the Victorian anti-vaccination movement still echo in the debate over the personal belief exemption, which was banned in California in June.

On the day the Leicester protesters gathered, vaccination was mandatory in England. Nearly a century before, Edward Jenner, a Scottish physician, had invented a method of protecting people against the raging threat of smallpox. The treatment was called variolation, and it involved voluntary infection with a similar disease. Patients were given cowpox to protect them against the much deadlier smallpox, much the way parents long exposed their children to chicken pox to protect them from getting sicker from the illness later in life. (Today pediatricians recommend the chicken pox vaccine instead.)

Asked in the video if she thinks vaccines are working:

"If "working" means suppressing a disease in a population, yes. "

That is what vaccines intend to do. "Do they increase the overall health of a population?" If you aren't sick and the vaccine keeps you from getting sick, then it won't improve your health- it keeps it from getting worse from the disease the vaccine targets. They don't claim to improve your health. "No- vaccines don't make you healthier". I would agree.

You have to define “working” first. Some people consider “working” to mean that you suppress a disease in a population. Some vaccines do work by that definition.

But no vaccine increases the health of a population, because vaccines do not increase the health of a human. There is nothing in a vaccine that our bodies actually require… There is no nutritive effect of a vaccine. So no, I don’t believe that they create health in a population.

True- vaccines are not a good source of nutrition. That is not their purpose.
 
Last edited:
Ron Paul's main occupation for the past 30 years has been "politician".

There is no upside in questioning the efficacy or safety of vaccinations as a politician.

If one were to ask RP about personal choice and mandatory vaccinations, I'm sure his support would be for the former, not the latter.
 
Ron Paul's main occupation for the past 30 years has been "politician".

There is no upside in questioning the efficacy or safety of vaccinations as a politician.

If one were to ask RP about personal choice and mandatory vaccinations, I'm sure his support would be for the former, not the latter.


 
Statement on Medical Malpractice Legislation
September 26, 2002 2002 Ron Paul

Mr. Speaker, HR 4600 also punishes victims of government mandates by limiting the ability of those who have suffered adverse reactions from vaccines to collect damages. Many of those affected by these provisions are children forced by federal mandates to receive vaccines. Oftentimes, parents reluctantly submit to these mandates in order to ensure their children can attend public school. HR 4600 rubs salt in the wounds of those parents whose children may have been harmed by government policies forcing children to receive unsafe vaccines.

Source: Congressional Record
 
You obviously didn't listen to the interview. Not shocked at all, because that is the way rabid pro-vaxxers behave.

You obviously didn't read what I posted (and he wrote). Ron Paul seems to be inconsistent on the issue.
 
Last edited:
You obviously didn't read what I posted (and he wrote). Ron Paul seems to be inconsistent on the issue.

It is not an inconsistent stance, because it is clear Dr. Paul took the time to research it more, just like Dr. Humphries did. As Dr. Humphries said, as she started to gain more knowledge, she realized that vaccines are filled with things that are simply not safe.

It's also clear that doctors are force-fed (along with the general public) a lot of disinformation and when they decided to do the research themselves, and gain more knowledge, they are smart enough to put two and two together a whole lot better.
 
You obviously didn't read what I posted (and he wrote). Ron Paul seems to be inconsistent on the issue.


You have 7 negative (red) reputation bars in the your profile. Count 'em. SEVEN! Why would anybody listen to you? People here are either well aware of what Ron Paul says or can easily find it. Your contrarian nonsense is a detriment.

No, Ron Paul is not inconsistent.

You, however, are consistently full of shat.


+ rep
 
Thanks for the additions; I haven’t been able to go through all of the information (links) yet…
I even think that most of the posts of Zippyjuan are worth the read (even though I disagree with just about all of them).

Zippyjuan said:
That is because polio had become so rare in the US. In 1955, there were 30,000 polio cases in the US which led to over 1000 deaths a year. Thanks to the vaccines (there were two- Sabin's and Salk's), by 1961 polio in the US had nearly vanished- fewer than 100 a year.
You appear to ignore that this was not the result of any improvement in health, but by simply forbidding medical doctors to label any disease as polio:
Donnay said:
11. In 1956 the AMA (The American Medical Association) instructed each licensed medical doctor that they could no longer classify polio as polio, or their license to practice would be terminated. Any paralysis was now to be diagnosed as AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) MS, MD, Bell's Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Guillian-Barre etc etc.

Zippyjuan said:
Non- polio. This is caused by a completely different virus than the one in the polio vaccine.
This is the way how big pharma manipulates the statistics, to show how wonderfully effective their “medicines” are. The same "Non-polio" “acute flaccid paralysis” labeling trick has been performed in India…

A similar trick was used, when the WHO simply changed the assessment methodology of “Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI)”. See the following thread: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?413858-Vaccine-Kills-9-Kids-Quinvaxem

Sri Lanka introduced the pentavalent vaccine from Crucell in January 2008. Within 3 months, 4 reports of deaths and 24 reports of adverse effects from the vaccine prompted a suspension of the initial vaccine batch. A subsequent death caused by the next batch in April 2009 led the authorities to suspend pentavalent vaccine use and resume DTwP and hepatitis B vaccination.
Bhutan introduced pentavalent vaccine from Panacea in September 2009. The identification of 5 cases with encephalopathy and/or meningoencephalitis shortly after vaccination prompted the authorities to suspend vaccination on 23 October 2009. Subsequently, 4 additional serious cases related caused by vaccination were identified.
India introduced pentavalent vaccine from the Serum Institute of India in December 2011. To date, 83 AEFI cases were reported, some of which died.
Vietnam introduced pentavalent vaccine from Crucell in June 2010. Through May 2013, a total of 43 serious AEFI cases were investigated, including 27 deaths. Following reports on 9 deaths following vaccination between December 2012 and March 2013, health authorities suspended use of the vaccine.
The team of “independent” experts of the WHO that reviewed the AEFIs, classified the fatal cases as not being caused by the vaccine: http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/pentavalent_vaccine/Jul_2013/en/

To cover up this black page in vaccine history, the WHO simply changed the assessment methodology of “Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI)” and effectively made it impossible to classify vaccination as the cause of death.
On 1 January 2008, the vaccine Quinvaxim (Crucell) was introduced in Sri Lanka. The WHO team which “investigated”, first reported that in 3 of the deaths there was plausible temporal association with vaccination, and the deaths could not be attributed to concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals. According to the standard WHO Brighton classification of AEFI, these 3 deaths had to be classified as “probably” related to immunisation. During this controversy, the AEFI classification was revised; the WHO simply deleted the categories “probable” and “possible” from the Brighton classification and concluded the AEFI were “unlikely” to be related to the vaccine.
Deaths during post-marketing surveillance cannot be classified as “consistent with causal association with vaccine”, if the vaccine did not cause a statistically significant increase in deaths in the small phase 3 trials. After licensure, all deaths that are seen in the larger post-marketing phase are labelled as “coincidental” deaths or “unclassifiable”. This effectively means that any vaccine that passes the phase 3 trials, per definition – in a great example of science – can never “cause” a single death.
The WHO team that “investigated” the Vietnam deaths used the revised WHO classification of AEFI.

The consequences of using the new classification can be seen in the causality assessment of 132 serious AEFI cases in India between 2012 and 2016. Of these 132 cases, 78 babies survived hospitalisation and 54 died. Among those who survived, 37 (47.4% of reactions) were labelled “vaccine-product-related reactions”. On the other hand, 51 (94.4%) of those who died, had reactions that were classified as “unclassifiable” or “coincidental due to something other than vaccine”. Not a single death case was classified as a “vaccine-product-related reaction”: http://ijme.in/articles/deaths-foll...-the-revised-aefi-classification/?galley=html
India-_AEVI-_Tab_1.png



Her example of smallpox vaccine in Leicester England not being effective dates from the 1800's. Much has been learned about vaccines since that time. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/...vaccinators-personal-belief-exemption/398321/

She has nothing current?
What do you mean by “learned”? In the 1800s medical doctors were “quacks” and in the 21th century they (or shoud I say we?) are completely brainwashed? Or maybe that big pharma has learned how to effectively use vaccines for sterilisation…
Here’s the report; “LEICESTER: SANITATION versus VACCINATION” by J.T. Biggs, from 1912 when “science” still meant something. Like Angelatc has stressed, Biggs was not some medical quack “Doctor”, but a pig farmer, who knew what he was talking about: http://www.whale.to/a/biggs.html
The Leicester Anti-Vaccination League was formed in 1869. The stalwart little band of pioneers, numbering less than twenty persons, laboured on, until they grew numerically to such an extent that, whereas in 1867 over 94 per cent of the children born were vaccinated, in 1897 only 1.3 per cent, of the infants were subjected to the trying ordeal. And that low percentage of vaccinations in the last-mentioned year was arrived at in spite of—and perhaps, to some extent, as the natural outcome of—many thousands of prosecutions against defaulters. These were instituted under the oppressive Act of 1867, and resulted in the infliction of fines, the levying of distress warrants, and the commitment of parents to prison. Obviously, those figures demonstrate that the people of Leicester were following the lead of the Anti-Vaccination League, and that not one class only, but all sections of the townspeople, were equally resolute in their opposition and detestation of the hateful legal enactments.

The experience of the terrible smallpox epidemic of 1871-73, when many thousands of vaccinated persons contracted the disease, and several hundreds died as the result of the alleged "protection" (!) having lamentably failed in its hour of trial, produced in the minds of the thinking people of Leicester pronounced hostility against the blood-polluting quackery, which was found to be more baneful in its ultimate results than the disease it was supposed to prevent.

See for example the following figure that shows that the unvaccinated Leicester had much lower small pox fatality rates than a couple of vaccinated cities and the vaccinated British army and navy.
biggsdiagc.jpg


See for example the correlation between the vaccination rate (red) and the death rate of a number of diseases.
biggs43.jpg


Influenza said:
But I'm wondering why the masses haven't been sterilized by the GMOs, fluoridated water, autism injections, chemtrails, (insert your theory here). Maybe it's all in your heads?
Maybe one day I’ll start a new thread, but I guess that Donnay has already posted about all of these things many times…
Maybe you can explain the chemtrails though; as we speak the area of Houston is being sprayed with chemical weapons under the guise of fighting an outbreak of the magical Zika virus that was discovered in 1947 and then in 2015 suddenly started causing microcephaly: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4873512/Texas-stop-mosquitoes-spreading-Zika-chemicals.html
 
Last edited:

And still the number of polio cases continued to rise. Proof there was no cause/ effect.

This is not discussion - this is trolling. Zippy made a succinct point, which was promptly ignored and followed by a wall of text.

The LEICESTER: SANITATION nonsense falls into the same category. It's posted as new info repeatedly, with absolutely no acknowledgement of the reality.

The thread started with polio and ended with chemtrails. Mark my words- these freaking people are as politically toxic as the white supremacists in the real world.
 
Last edited:
Pesticides

I’m beginning to think that the polio and AIDS “epidemics” are more similar than most people think.
From the data I’ve read it looks like either: 1) pesticides is a cause of immune deficiency which makes that people aren’t able to cope with the polio virus anymore, 2) pesticides causes polio like symptoms including paralysis.

Labelling paralysis first as “polio” and then – after introduction of the vaccine – as “Acute Flaccid Paralysis”. The following graph shows that the number of paralysis cases hasn’t only risen in India, as a result of the massive polio vaccination campaign, but also in the rest of the world, from something like 17,000 in 1996, to 100,000 in 2010. Thanks to the World Health Organisation, UNICEF and the Gates Foundation.
Rise-of-Acute-Flaccid-Paralysis-AFP-and-Fall-of-Polio.jpg


In 1942, the epidemic of the first half of the century subsided, and there were fewer than 5,000 cases of polio in the United States. Around 1948, the number of polio cases began to soar. Polio reached a peak in 1949, with nearly 43,000 cases. By 1951 the number had dropped to below 28,000. Following a government-subsidised study of polio vaccine, the number soared to an all-time high of more than 55,000 cases.
Most diagnoses were based upon clinical observation, not sophisticated virological studies. After introduction of the vaccine, the number of polio cases decreased, while the number of meningitis cases increased. Most cases reported as non-paralytic poliomyelitis prior to 1 July 1958 were after that reported as viral or aseptic meningitis.
Reclassifying%20a%20Disease%20-%20polio%20and%20meningitis%20USA.jpg

According to Jonas Salk, the live virus polio vaccine developed by Dr. Albert Sabin was:
the principal if not the sole cause of the 140 vaccine cases reported in the U.S. since 1961. At the present time the risk of acquiring polio from the live virus vaccine is greater than from naturally occurring viruses.
http://medicinekillsmillions.com/articles/polio-USA-incidence-decline-vaccination-in-doubt.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/dw3Di)


Since 1940, pesticides were introduced in Europe and North America.
See what looks like correlation between the amount of insecticides and polio cases from 1912 to 1963 in England and Wales.
britain_graph.jpg



Mortin S. Biskind was one of the first to see the pesticides as the cause of the polio “epidemic”:
Central nervous system diseases such as polio are actually the physiological and symptomatic manifestations of the ongoing government and industry sponsored inundation of the world's populace with central nervous system poisons.
(...)
When the population is exposed to a chemical agent known to produce in animals lesions in the spinal cord resembling those in human polio, and thereafter the latter disease increases sharply in incidence and maintains its epidemic character year after year, is it unreasonable to suspect an etiologic relationship?

Biskind’s views fell into disfavour with the establishment, who favoured that polio was caused by a virus. By October 1955, Biskind’s career was destroyed.
See the correlation between the most used chemicals, DDT, BHC, Arsenic and Lead, and the number of “polio” cases from 1940 to 1970.
All-1912-1970%20copy.gif

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong
(archived here: http://archive.is/H8uz6)
 
Last edited:
This is not discussion - this is trolling. Zippy made a succinct point, which was promptly ignored and followed by a wall of text.

The LEICESTER: SANITATION nonsense falls into the same category. It's posted as new info repeatedly, with absolutely no acknowledgement of the reality.

The thread started with polio and ended with chemtrails. Mark my words- these freaking people are as politically toxic as the white supremacists in the real world.

Leicester is relevant to history because of those who worship Jenner and the perpetuated lie pro-vaxxers have use to point out how small pox vaccines saved lives-- but those of us who study history know that is simply not true.

Are you familiar with raw unfiltered and unpasteurized apple cider vinegar did more in the late 1800's for small pox than vaccines?

As Hitler's propaganda minster once said:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

What does that make you in the real world?
 
This is not discussion - this is trolling.
That's precisely what I was thinking when reading your garbage posts!

I’ve read some general information on polio; the official story appears to contradict itself.

When most people think about the horrors of polio, they think that it’s some horrible infectious disease that causes paralysis. In reality, according to the official numbers only 0.5% of the infected suffer from paralysis. Polio can be classed in 4 severities:
1 – In more than 90% of the cases, the polio infection causes antibodies to develop, without symptoms, and the person doesn't even know that infection occurred.
2 - The majority of the remaining less than 10%, suffer some flu-like symptoms: fever, digestive upset and possibly a cough. This infection has no lasting effects, except immunity.
3 – For a small percentage, polio reaches its “second stage, and reaches the Central Nervous System (CNS), these patients get seriously ill, but don’t suffer any permanent damage.
4 - For about 1 in 200 who are exposed, that polio reaches the CNS and paralyses enough motor neurons that control anywhere from one limb to the whole spinal cord. If the infection reaches motor neurons that are high in the spinal cord or in the brain, death is the likely result.

When you read this, you must conclude that:
1) It’s impossible to know (or even estimate) how many people are infected by polio, as more than 95% doesn’t suffer from a major illness and don't go to the doctor.
2) Because only a small percentage of the polio patients get paralysed (or even die), it’s almost impossible to know for sure that this was the result of the polio, as it’s impossible to rule out other causes. I can only imagine some horrible experiments, in which this could be determined. Determining that this percentage is 1 in 200 is completely impossible...

Because there’s no way to determine how many people are infected with polio, the number of polio cases is founded on fantasy. Furthermore the number of polio cases doesn’t even matter, as most people that are infected by it, don’t suffer anything grave.
This means that the only reasonable way to estimate how bad the polio “epidemic” is, is by the number of Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) cases. By general consensus the amount of AFP cases has increased enormously.

By general consensus the polio virus had been active for hundreds of years. And until the beginning of the twentieth century never caused any “epidemics” or great calamities.
The first serious polio outbreak happened in 1916, “coincidentally” in New York, with over 27,000 known cases and over 6,000 deaths. By multiplying 6,000 by 200 (in reality according to the official statistrics, I should multiply this by even more...) this means that at least 1,200,000 people were infected with polio. This is completely ridiculous, and in a complete disregard with the “official” statistics, a maximum of 120,000 infected is named.

By general consensus, polio is easier transmitted with poor hygiene, and it is claimed that sanitation level improved in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century (at least in the developed world).
This raises the contradiction that in the hundreds of years before 1916, polio would have been worse...
This means that polio's doesn’t comply with Farr's Law; big pharma invented a unique argument (which almost per definition means it’s bad science). I’ll try to explain this bizarre hypothesis as well as I can.
Supposedly when a baby is born in a “dirty” environment, it gets polio antibodies from its mother (who must have been exposed to polio). Then the baby gets infected within a couple of months after birth, and is still “protected”, and then becomes immune for polio, without anyone noticing that the baby was infected...
With better hygiene, either the mother was never infected (so cannot pass the antibodies to the baby) or the baby doesn’t get infected in the first months (when it still has the antibodies of the mother).

According to this bizarre hypothesis (which is the official explanation), with better hygiene (in particular) the number people infected with polio comes down, which means that this would be the only way to eradicate polio (never mind nutrition, which isn’t part of the agenda of our health care officials). But then because relatively more people get infected, when they don’t have the inherited protection from the mother, the consequences of polio or more grave (including more AFP cases that are caused by polio).
Just by looking at the rising number of paralysis cases, we can see that something is wrong in the state propaganda they want us to believe. It’s more probable of course that paralysis isn’t caused by polio, but by something else (like for example pesticides)...

After Mortind Biskind, in April 1949, published his study on neuropsychiatric manifestations of DDT, he was attacked with blatantly false data.

On 25 April 1955, the polio vaccination program encountered disaster when “faulty” vaccines manufactured by the Cutter Laboratory in California were discovered. The incidence rate was 17 per 100,000 for one month.
In 1958, incidence rates of over 400 per 100,000 per month were found in Detroit with the polio vaccines, which was swept under the carpet.

Alexander Langmuir lobbied Congress, to give the CDC contingent powers to deal with potential emergencies. In July 1951, he assembled the first class of the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS). New EIS officers were first assigned for 2 years to hospitals or state and local health departments in the US. Upon completing their field experience, EIS alumni – as agents for the CDC – infiltrated the medical community.
According to British epidemiologist Gordon Stewart, a former CDC consultant, the EIS was nicknamed the "medical CIA”: http://www.wellwithin1.com/pol_all.htm
(archived here: http://archive.is/CgcPA)

In 1928, the German born Henry Kumm joined the Rockefeller Foundation for Medical Research.
In 1951, Kumm resigned from the Rockefeller Foundation to a position as assistant director of research at the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis. He conducted field trials in the study of gamma globulin and the Salk vaccine and became the Director Of Polio Research at NFIP in 1954.
After his wonderful work on polio, Kumm rejoined the Rockefeller Foundation in 1959: http://www.medicalarchives.jhmi.edu/papers/kumm.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/dmOmz)


During 1933-1937, there were a total of 37,463 poliomyelitis cases in total (4,930 deaths).
From 1938-1942 31,993 cases in total (4,165 deaths).
In 1943 12,449 cases (1,115 deaths).
In 1944, 19,029 cases (1,433 deaths).
In 1945, 13,619 cases (1,189 deaths).

Despite the declining cases of polio in the US, in 1946, President Harry S. Truman declared the “War on polio” (where have I heard the “War on ...” before?).
In some sick experiments DDT was sprayed on cities to fight polio. For example on 27 August 1945, a bomber spayed Rockford, IL with DDT and in 1946, a massive amount of DDT was sprayed in San Antonio, TX. The results of these “experiments” were never released.
In a great effort to replicate these wonderful experiments...
Firestarter said:
At this moment, the area of Houston is being sprayed with chemical weapons under the guise of fighting an outbreak of the magical Zika virus that was discovered in 1947 and then in 2015 suddenly started causing microcephaly: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4873512/Texas-stop-mosquitoes-spreading-Zika-chemicals.html

In 1946, the number of reported polio cases hit 25,191 — nearly twice the number of 1945.
In 1947, the cases dropped to 10,737 (580 deaths).
In 1948, a huge increase to 27,680 (2,140 deaths).
During 1949-1951, the number of polio cases remained high with a total of 103,719 (an annual average of 34,573).
In 1951, DDT fumigation in the US was at a peak.
In 1952, the number of polio cases peaked at 52,879.
And then began to decline (before polio vaccination was introduced) to 35,592 in 1953, 38,476 in 1954 and 28,985 in 1955: http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/07/ddt-and-the-rise-and-fall-of-polio/
(archived here: http://archive.is/Jf6P5)


After introduction of the polio vaccine in the USA, the number of polio cases actually increased. Obviously some doctors didn’t understand that they had to report these cases differently after the vaccine had been introduced...
Vermont reported 15 cases of polio during the one-year report before 30 August 1954 (before mass vaccination), compared to 55 cases of polio in the following year (a 266% increase).
Rhode Island reported 22 cases before as compared to 122 cases after vaccination (a 454% increase).
Massachusetts went from 273 to 2027 polio cases (a 642% increase).
In New Hampshire the figures increased from 38 to 129; in Connecticut from 144 to 276;
Figure-2-Polio_thumb.jpg


During the 1950s, doctors and scientists on the staff of the NIH knew that the Salk vaccine caused polio and refused to vaccinate their own children. Some health departments banned the vaccination.
The Idaho State Health Director declared: “I hold the Salk vaccine and its manufacturers responsible” for the polio outbreak that killed several and hospitalized dozens more.
In the mid-1990s, during a period of less than 5 year, 13,641 adverse reactions to the oral polio vaccine were reported: http://vaxtruth.org/2012/03/the-polio-vaccine-part-2-2/
(archived here: http://archive.is/yd2Ar)


See the following correspondence “Non-Polio AFP Rate and Polio Eradication” (2008): http://medind.nic.in/ibv/t08/i5/ibvt08i5p422.pdf
(archived here: http://archive.is/ArQps)
India has made great progress towards eradicating polio and has had excellent AFP surveillance. Since 2004 there was rapid increase in the non-polio AFP rate, which reached 8 in 2007 (Table I). The increase in non-polio AFP rate is mainly limited to the two polio hyperendemic states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar(3).
The “Non-Polio” AFP rate in India went from 1.45 in 1998 to 8.45 in 2007 (an increase of 483% in 10 years).

On the following site the official numbers of AFP cases can be seen from 2000 to 2016, globally the numbers went from: 30,625 in 2000 to 109,807 in 2016 (an increase of 259% in 16 years).
Africa from 5,936 to 31,922 in 2016 (an increase of 438% in 16 years).
East Mediterranean from 3,253 to 11,357 in 2016 (an increase of 249% in 16 years).
South East Asia from 10,758 to 25,790 in 2016 (an increase of 140% in 16 years).
India from 8,103 in 2000 to 46,579 in 2016 (an increase of 475% in 16 years): https://extranet.who.int/polis/public/CaseCount.aspx


Also see the number of polio cases in the Dominican Republic from 1978 to 1987. When the OPV vaccine was introduced in 1983, there were hardly any cases of polio. Also see the sharp low in number of cases in 1979...
table13.gif
 
Last edited:
Back
Top