ABC News: Accused Colorado shooter appears "dazed" in court.

I saw receipts from July 2nd. There was almost full cover body gear and it wasn't very expensive. In the hundreds. There are Fusion Centers in all states to track these types of purchases. I guess our tax dollars have failed us yet again. But that damned gasmask is totally out of place and too far from the crimescene to have gotten there by Holmes and the AR 15 with the 30 round clip outside the door does not match the 100 round drum clip sporting AR 15 described at the shooters weapon. There is a four inch height discrepancy in the shooter and the guy who went to the theatre door for the cell call.

Rev9

He bought Blackhawk tactical gear from www.tacticalgear.com.
http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Colorado-shooter--163288766.html

A post from our CEO regarding the tragic shooting at an Aurora, Colorado movie theater.

On July 2, 2012 TacticalGear.com received an order from James Holmes, the alleged shooter in the Colorado theater massacre. His order included an urban assault vest, two magazine pouches and a tactical knife spending a total of $306.79. Mr. Holmes elected to pay an additional $15.63 for UPS 2nd Day Air to expedite his order. We processed this order as any other, and Mr. Holmes signed for the associated package on July 5 at 2:21 p.m. local time.

In the wake of the tragedy, we have done our best to cooperate with the media and law enforcement agencies by passing on any relevant information. We have since been inundated with countless phone calls, emails and interview requests. Much of this communication has been quite hostile and threatening in nature. We have been falsely accused of selling Mr. Holmes firearms and ammunition over the Internet illegally without conducting the mandated background checks. Some members of our customer relations team have been brought to tears by people insisting that we have “blood on our hands.”

In an effort to combat this falsehood, myself and our Chief Operating Officer conducted a series of interviews in an attempt to clear up any misconceptions. We reiterated that TacticalGear.com primarily serves the law enforcement community and that we are proud to supply these heroes with the tools they need to keep our communities safe. During the course of these interviews, we were repeatedly questioned about what steps we were taking to prevent the general public from acquiring tactical gear in the future. In response to this line of questioning, statements were made that some have perceived as anti-gun and anti-2nd amendment.

We want to set the record straight and publically state that we fully support the 2nd amendment. The spirit of what we were trying to communicate was that tactical clothing and equipment should not be put in the same category as firearms and ammunition. Firearms and ammunition are subject to considerable regulation, and the notion that tactical gear should be as well is outrageous. Unfortunately, in some instances our choice of words were poor and misguided. For this, we accept full responsibility and sincerely apologize to anyone that took offense to these comments.

I am very proud of TacticalGear.com. It is a great company with a great staff. Each day we wake up thinking about how we can better serve our customers the gear they need when they need it. We work tirelessly to achieve these goals, and we are passionate about what we do. Many of us are avid gun owners and enthusiasts. We frequently visit the local shooting range and keep firearms in the office. We wholeheartedly support the freedom Americans enjoy to legally purchase guns and ammunition. I personally believe that if some members of the audience had concealed carry weapons at hand that night perhaps less blood would have been shed. No amount of gun control is going to prevent a sociopath hell-bent on terrorism from hurting a large group of people.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families of this horrific event. If you have any questions or comments about this issue please direct them to us via email at [email protected].

-Chad Weinman
CEO, TacticalGear.com
 
Last edited:
Why can't we just ban the crazy conspiracy theorists from these forums and leave the normal Ron Paul supporters like myself, RonPaulFanInGA, erowe, and all the other regular Ron Paul supporters?
 
I didn't edit anything. I just wasn't going to let you get away with all your vicous personal insults that you regularly give out to other posters here. Some of us will actually stand up for oursleves.

The proof is in my reply which does not match the words in your edited post. You are a liar and claim to be a Godly man. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Rev9
 
Why can't we just ban the crazy conspiracy theorists from these forums and leave the normal Ron Paul supporters like myself, RonPaulFanInGA, erowe, and all the other regular Ron Paul supporters?

There ya go. Pick the jerks always telling us to hang up the track shoes..it's over..since forever. Eff you and horse you rode in on. Same with RPFIG and Erowe.

Rev9
 
Why can't we just ban the crazy conspiracy theorists from these forums and leave the normal Ron Paul supporters like myself, RonPaulFanInGA, erowe, and all the other regular Ron Paul supporters?

But the world isn't as it is portrayed on the television. I'm not saying I agree with every theory pushed on this site by various individuals, but I appreciate that they are asking relevant, pertinent questions. Don't be scared by the conclusions. Remember the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing others he doesn't exist.
 
Why can't we just ban the crazy conspiracy theorists from these forums and leave the normal Ron Paul supporters like myself, RonPaulFanInGA, erowe, and all the other regular Ron Paul supporters?

You enjoy labels don't you? WGAFF what we think, is that not the point of these threads, to discuss and interpret what goes on in the real world?
 
constitution

Yep, and to be clear I never agreed with what jbauer said. I was having an argument the other day on Facebook with a "conservative" who said that Holmes should simply be declared a "domestic terrorist" and shouldn't have a right to have a trial. I defended the 6th amendment and said that Holmes deserves a trial, even though it's known that he did it. Even though he killed all these people, we have to give a trial to everyone and never violate the Constitution.
 
Yep, and to be clear I never agreed with what jbauer said. I was having an argument the other day on Facebook with a "conservative" who said that Holmes should simply be declared a "domestic terrorist" and shouldn't have a right to have a trial. I defended the 6th amendment and said that Holmes deserves a trial, even though it's known that he did it. Even though he killed all these people, we have to give a trial to everyone and never violate the Constitution.

Except the constitution requires that a jury walk into the court room without assuming that everything that gets repeated on TV multiple times must be true.
 
Except the constitution requires that a jury walk into the court room without assuming that everything that gets repeated on TV multiple times must be true.

That's why people who are members of a jury aren't allowed to watch TV or read newspapers during the trial.
 
Back
Top