Revolution9
Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 9,323
So, uh, feel like providing some sort of tangible evidence of that?
No.., You feel like doing some fucking research?? Go learn on your own. I owe clowns like you nothing.
Rev9
So, uh, feel like providing some sort of tangible evidence of that?
Yer really looking for a fight pal and I will smoke the living crap out of you and make every post you make a miserable experience if you do not piss off immediately An apology is in order i believe. Not that I expect one from a frikkin bloodthirsty sociopath who is also a projection master.
rev9
I'm not sure if it's even worth it talking to someone who wears such a thick tinfoil hat. You're insulting about 65% of the American people who support the death penalty, including a large number of libertarians. The death penalty is not an issue that all libertarians agree with each other on.
I'm not sure if it's even worth it talking to someone who wears such a thick tinfoil hat. You're insulting about 65% of the American people who support the death penalty, including a large number of libertarians. The death penalty is not an issue that all libertarians agree with each other on.
I don't believe that the same government that is too incompetent to run the post office is somehow competent enough to carry out all of these conspiracies. You guys sure seem to think the government is good at carrying out these operations.
I believe you started it all with the "bloodthirsty sociopath" nonsense. You owe me an apology, but I won't expect to get it.
I support the death penalty for proven cases where there is no shadow of doubt and it was hieinous, premeditated and carried out with malice and aforethought in a sane state of mind.
Fuck you. You started it. The went back and edited your post chickenshit. Can't stand by your original insults and now yer gonna play innocent. Get yer mommy's skirt out of the closet to hide behind. Now yer frikkin' lying. I hope your Creator tells you a tale or two about truthfulness.
rev9
No.., You feel like doing some fucking research?? Go learn on your own. I owe clowns like you nothing.
Rev9
I am way more informed and smarter than you on your best day.
Wow, I'm glad I'm not crazy. That's all I can say about this thread.
I would hate to be the lab technician who finds out that Holmes AR-15 was not the primary murder weapon. That would ruin anyone's day.
This man was plotting this for four months, buying all kinds of firearms, bullets, and protective gear. It's a known fact that the shooter didn't decide to do this at the last second.
Not crazy. Inquisitive. I don't know what happened. I'm just trying to piece together all the variables.
I wasn't talking about you.
The protective gear was all bought over the internet. But now here's where, regardless of your belief in Holmes guilt, your inquisitive mind should kick in. Remember Operation Fast and Furious? We know the federal government has been involved in gun smuggling. Many think this is part of an assault on the 2nd amendment. Now there's a shooter and some unnamed law enforcement official says that this was bought over 4 months, and you believe it without question because....? I mean don't you want to see receipts? Maybe some store surveillance footage?
You probably deserve to go to the insane asylum just as much as this Holmes guy.
your damning yourself with faint praise. you would hardly find a more enthusiastic apologist for killing innocent people than TC, as long as the killer was told to do so by the military and the victim was some brown guy living far away.
is this the most idiotic post of the week or the month?
I supposed the phrase "will you visit me in prison" isn't even enough to convince some people here.
http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-sex-website-penis-cops/
It's beyond you why some people find it to be incredibly scary that our government executes its own citizens after they're already caught and imprisoned? Maybe you haven't thought about it too hard. I don't even need to use the "some people have been exonerated afterwards" argument to oppose it. That it is morally wrong to kill someone who is imprisoned and no longer posing a threat is enough for me to abhor it. It's clearly anti-NAP.This kind of case is exactly why we have the death penalty. How anyone can be opposed to the death penalty for this guy is beyond me.
In other words, no you don't. You're good for spouting off unsubstantiated claims, Infowars-type garbage and insults but not much else.