A lawful and peaceful revolution.

[wizardwatson]

"Ænema"

Some say the end is near.
Some say we'll see Armageddon soon.
I certainly hope we will.
I sure could use a vacation from this

Bullshit three ring circus sideshow of freaks

Here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A.
The only way to fix it is to flush it all away.
Any fucking time. Any fucking day.
Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona Bay.

Fret for your figure and
Fret for your latte and
Fret for your lawsuit and
Fret for your hairpiece and
Fret for your Prozac and
Fret for your pilot and
Fret for your contract and
Fret for your car.

It's a bullshit three ring circus sideshow of freaks

Here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A.
The only way to fix it is to flush it all away.
Any fucking time. Any fucking day.
Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona Bay.

Some say a comet will fall from the sky.
Followed by meteor showers and tidal waves.
Followed by fault lines that cannot sit still.
Followed by millions of dumbfounded dip shits.

[INTERMISSION]

"I hope they're wearing their brown pants." - Deadpool

Proverbs 1:26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh;

Deadpool (Wade Winston Wilson) is a fictional antihero appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. Created by writer Fabian Nicieza and artist/writer Rob Liefeld, the character first appeared in The New Mutants #98 (February 1991). Deadpool was depicted as a supervillain when he made his first appearance in The New Mutants and later in issues of X-Force, but has since evolved into the role of an antihero.

Deadpool is a disfigured and mentally unstable mercenary with the superhuman ability of an accelerated healing factor. He is known as the "Merc with a Mouth" because of his talkative nature and tendency to break the fourth wall, which is used by writers to humorous effect.

The character was portrayed by Ryan Reynolds in the 2009 film X-Men Origins: Wolverine, who will reprise the role in Deadpool, set to be released on February 12, 2016.[5][6]



[/INTERMISSSION]

Some say the end is near.
Some say we'll see Armageddon soon.
I certainly hope we will cause
I sure could use a vacation from this

Stupid shit, silly shit, stupid shit...

One great big festering neon distraction,
I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied.

Learn to swim. [3x]

Mom's gonna fix it all soon.
Mom's comin' round to put it back the way it ought to be.

Learn to swim.

Fuck L Ron Hubbard and
Fuck all his clones.
Fuck all these gun-toting
Hip gangster wannabes.

Learn to swim.

Fuck retro anything.
Fuck your tattoos.
Fuck all you junkies and
Fuck your short memory.

Learn to swim.

Fuck smiley glad-hands
With hidden agendas.
Fuck these dysfunctional,
Insecure actresses.

Learn to swim.

Cause I'm praying for rain
And I'm praying for tidal waves
I wanna see the ground give way.
I wanna watch it all go down.
Mom, please flush it all away.
I wanna see it go right in and down.
I wanna watch it go right in.
Watch you flush it all away.

And they cried with a loud voice
saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true
dost thou not judge and avenge our
blood on them that dwell on the earth?

Time to bring it down again.
Don't just call me pessimist.
Try and read between the lines.

I can't imagine why you wouldn't
Welcome any change, my friend.

I wanna see it all come down.
Bring it down
Suck it down.
Flush it down.

 

[phill4paul]

"Ænema"

Some say the end is near.
Some say we'll see Armageddon soon.
I certainly hope we will.
I sure could use a vacation from this

Bullshit three ring circus sideshow of freaks

Here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A.
The only way to fix it is to flush it all away.
Any fucking time. Any fucking day.
Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona Bay.

Fret for your figure and
Fret for your latte and
Fret for your lawsuit and
Fret for your hairpiece and
Fret for your Prozac and
Fret for your pilot and
Fret for your contract and
Fret for your car.

It's a bullshit three ring circus sideshow of freaks

Here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A.
The only way to fix it is to flush it all away.
Any fucking time. Any fucking day.
Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona Bay.

Some say a comet will fall from the sky.
Followed by meteor showers and tidal waves.
Followed by fault lines that cannot sit still.
Followed by millions of dumbfounded dip shits.

Some say the end is near.
Some say we'll see Armageddon soon.
I certainly hope we will cause
I sure could use a vacation from this

Stupid shit, silly shit, stupid shit...

One great big festering neon distraction,
I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied.

Learn to swim. [3x]

Mom's gonna fix it all soon.
Mom's comin' round to put it back the way it ought to be.

Learn to swim.

Fuck L Ron Hubbard and
Fuck all his clones.
Fuck all these gun-toting
Hip gangster wannabes.

Learn to swim.

Fuck retro anything.
Fuck your tattoos.
Fuck all you junkies and
Fuck your short memory.

Learn to swim.

Fuck smiley glad-hands
With hidden agendas.
Fuck these dysfunctional,
Insecure actresses.

Learn to swim.

Cause I'm praying for rain
And I'm praying for tidal waves
I wanna see the ground give way.
I wanna watch it all go down.
Mom, please flush it all away.
I wanna see it go right in and down.
I wanna watch it go right in.
Watch you flush it all away.

And they cried with a loud voice
saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true
dost thou not judge and avenge our
blood on them that dwell on the earth?

Time to bring it down again.
Don't just call me pessimist.
Try and read between the lines.

I can't imagine why you wouldn't
Welcome any change, my friend.

I wanna see it all come down.
Bring it down
Suck it down.
Flush it down.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to wizardwatson again.. This is my "go to" song when bombarded by today's idiocy. When turned up to 11 on the volume knob it has a way of purging the filth and cleansing the soul like no other I've found.

 

[Ronin Truth]

People have wanted to talk to me forever. Now they have the chance and all I get is an army of insufferable bores. Well, if you call a couple posts a day an army, anyway.



WATSON Surname Meaning & Origin:

Watson is a patronymic surname meaning "son of Watt." The popular Middle English given names Wat or Watt were pet forms of the name Walter, meaning "ruler of the army." From the elements wald, meaning rule, and heri, meaning army.

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

Yeah, the Bell quote option occurred to me later also, and was my second choice. Are you perchance, just a stream of consciousness forum poster?

"Not that there is anything wrong with that." -- Seinfeld

 

[Anti Federalist]

Foot in mouth and head up asshole...whatcha' talkin' 'bout???

You must of been high...

 

[Anti Federalist]

///

 

[Ronin Truth]

Not really, but I do seem to be experiencing some double thread post vision, if that's of any real help.

 

[wizardwatson]

Yeah, the Bell quote option occurred to me later also, and was my second choice. Are you perchance, just a stream of consciousness forum poster?

"Not that there is anything wrong with that." -- Seinfeld

Depends on the weather. Perhaps I just have a Wild Muse.

Matthew 5:48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Malachi 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

"To change with change is the changeless state" - Bruce Lee

"Water is the softest stuff on Earth. Yet it can break through rock. Be like water my friend." - Bruce Lee



Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.

Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

Revealation 11:3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses - Jesus

Two witnesses must take part in the engagement and wedding ceremonies if the marriage is to be legal and binding.

http://www.ketubah.com/templates/template28_article.cfm?article=12

The seven days of the chuppah (honeymoon) corresponds to the seven years of the Tribulation.

http://www.gindorf.us/coolstuff/writings/articles/wedding.html

The business about the proof of virginity has to do with honesty in dealings (sincere agreements?). You have to understand that in biblical days, as many cultures still do today, it was the parents who arranged a marriage.

http://lavistachurchofchrist.org/LVanswers/2006/11-02.htm

And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand (sounds like they don't understand sincere agreeements, am I right?)

...

I'm so confused.

If the Key of David isn't David's Key and The Church Is The Virgin But Not On Certain Layer of Cake Then Who Wrote The Book Of Love



See, now isn't playing more fun than pretending to "know" ye doublminded charlatans?

Certain Tea Leaves you feeling relaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxed.

The Socratic Method isn't nearly as useful as the Socratic Paradox.

Feedback back appreciated you lazy bums.

See you later. Nap time.

Lighten up. Some things are just funny. And mercy is a real thing.



"For starters, I pointed to the Bible and said, because it's in the FUCKIN' BIBLE YOU STUPID IDIOT!"

Me and the kiddo laughed our asses off watching that video like 10 times straight. Some things are so funny you expose your child to a little cussing. Truth.

Bwahahahaha!

 

[Ronin Truth]

Depends on the weather. Perhaps I just have a Wild Muse.

Matthew 5:48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Malachi 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

"To change with change is the changeless state" - Bruce Lee

"Water is the softest stuff on Earth. Yet it can break through rock. Be like water my friend." - Bruce Lee



Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.

Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

Revealation 11:3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses - Jesus

Two witnesses must take part in the engagement and wedding ceremonies if the marriage is to be legal and binding.

http://www.ketubah.com/templates/template28_article.cfm?article=12

The seven days of the chuppah (honeymoon) corresponds to the seven years of the Tribulation.

http://www.gindorf.us/coolstuff/writings/articles/wedding.html

The business about the proof of virginity has to do with honesty in dealings (sincere agreements?). You have to understand that in biblical days, as many cultures still do today, it was the parents who arranged a marriage.

http://lavistachurchofchrist.org/LVanswers/2006/11-02.htm

And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand (sounds like they don't understand sincere agreeements, am I right?)

...

I'm so confused.

If the Key of David isn't David's Key and The Church Is The Virgin But Not On Certain Layer of Cake Then Who Wrote The Book Of Love



See, now isn't playing more fun than pretending to "know" ye doublminded charlatans?

Certain Tea Leaves you feeling relaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxed.

The Socratic Method isn't nearly as useful as the Socratic Paradox.

Feedback back appreciated you lazy bums.

See you later. Nap time.

Lighten up. Some things are just funny. And mercy is a real thing.



"For starters, I pointed to the Bible and said, because it's in the FUCKIN' BIBLE YOU STUPID IDIOT!"

Me and the kiddo laughed our asses off watching that video like 10 times straight. Some things are so funny you expose your child to a little cussing. Truth.

Bwahahahaha!

Bruce never did a belly flop off the high board, or he wouldn't be talking about "soft" water.

Greek wild muse? Female? What's the name of the muse?

Sometimes my eyes just tend to glaze over and I then tend to doze off for a bit, when confronted with a wall o' text, etc.

FWIW, just an FYI.

On my RPF computer, this one, I have no sound capability. I've found silence to truly be golden, if that makes any difference.

Soooo, not being a lip reader your videos are largely a waste for me. <shrug!>

 

[CPUd]

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Wow, nearly a whole page of corporate conditioned posts.

America has need of populations unified behind effective action that can defend rights. This would be the truest American culture.

Americans will learn that no media will share an appreciation of that agreement which can fully defend unalienable rights. When families collectively realize that they must share the agreement which protects their children's futures, that truest American culture will incubate in an environment where parents teach their children along with their nieghbors about our first constitutional right that we can share action upon most meaningfully, to alter or abolish government destructive to our rights.

Young adults will see for the first time in generations, their parents discussing concrete action they can take which WILL ASSURE, if taken up by communities, that the young people can expect to have rights and freedoms, even justice.

With enough zeal in sharing the elements of agreement propelling our lawful and peaceful revolution, they may even see that Americans working reasonably and lawfully together to restore fully constitutional government and the republic over it, can even share realistic hope of stopping wholesale environmental destruction.

And sincere Americans do easily understand these prime principles, while the legal process seems new and strange, they also see how their numbers could cause some legislators of states to stand with them.

Accordingly, sharing that which engenders understanding upon prime rights, is the true path to an acceptable future.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

By the way. Jeffrey Lebowski got a carton of milk on the day that Atta and Neo got their license renewed. That's kind of spooky.

It's interesting that Jeffrey Lebowski got a carton of milk on 9/11, but not as spooky as this.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

One of the greatest legal scenes imaginable comes from our potential lawful and peaceful
Revolution.

That culture of agreement upon prime constitutional intent must mature before this a reality. But, if Americans are to be free and have rights, to have tire futures where real hope is a part of life, that culture must develop. And it will come about as I described in my post on the previous page.

The scene is a state captitol.

Five thousand protestors with signs, many say, "Time to alter or abolish, Our first right!". And, "Restore the PURPOSE of free speech. It is an amicable but passionate gathering.
What is different is that law enforcement officers are smiling and discussing issues with protestors. No animosity exists there.

That is the first thing that unnerves the legislature inside their building. Cops in riot gear showed up perhaps for an hour or so, but left after protestors calmly and lucidly explained what they were doing. Some cops probably wanted to stay, oppressing, but others firmly told them to leave, then stayed themselves in ordinary uniform, mingling with the people in small groups and as individuals. Obviously keeping the peace, fully peacefully. Smiling and talking with families about the futures they all share.

As the legislature begins its session, the spokesperson for the protest moves into the building with an assistant carrying paper. They of course walk through a metal detector and enter the building.

When they are called to speak, and present, they calmly state that they are of the people which have learned their role of "masters of the congress and the courts" because ALL of the protestors outside can speak completely and in full agreement upon the most prime rights and constitutional intent shared by all citizens of all states.
They state that all of the legislators must share that agreement and that they have come to present that agreement. That they have been chosen by the people to bring that definition of intent and seek formal agreement with full acceptance of those same rights from all of the legislators.

A petition signed by many more than 5,000 is presented to the legislation as a whole. But one, commonly seem as unconstitutional legislator is singled out with a petition directed at them having the same request as the whole legislation.

In an alternative scenario, perhaps only that legislator is presented with a petition, with the same to the entire legislation 45 days later addressing the response or lack of it from that legislator.

In that scenario 45 days later. IF that legislator failed to respond or refused to agree with the prime constitutional intent of the peoples right to alter or abolish and their right to have free speech functionally serve the purpose of creating unity adequate to alter or abolish, the remaining legislators are asked to sign, because if they do not, the people of the state are deprived of their right to alter of abolish properly through Article V which demands that all amendments have constitutional intent.

Without legislators that recognize the most prime constitutional intent, how can the state possibly represent the people at Article V properly?

This is simple and fundamental to the law of the land.

Therefore, the legislation is presented with a demand to impeach any legislators that will not sign in acceptance of the petition.

Then the law starts to work, or try to fail. Whereupon truly good lawyers, and there must be a few that cannot find a way to practice law with enough good to be rewarding, so mostly don't, but in this case they do, and with great zeal shaming any judges that will not legally compel a reluctant legislation to follow the law.

After this process completes in one state, and there is only one lawful resolution to the matter, all legislators that refuse either resign or face impeachment proceedings, whereupon the protestors start upon media to publicize the event fully if they have not already.

Lawsuits are threatened if front page stories are not published. Having seen that judges cannot resist the peoples rightful and lawful agreement with imposition by authority for constitutional continuity, the papers reluctantly start publishing.

Then the wave of mass American agreement begins. TV's are shut off if they do not continue the story. Masses assemble in front of there headquarters to picket. Traffic finds parking and joins the protest. Attorneys hurriedly file lawsuits to assure that the media WILL be held accountable to the public trust.

Shareholders call the corporate offices concerned that viewer ship and profits will suffer. Smart corporate officers aquiese and settle out of court and begin reporting on the movement.

This is America after all.

 

[wizardwatson]

It's interesting that Jeffrey

Lebowski got a carton of milk on 9/11, but not as spooky as this.

Why are you derailing your own thread?

You are not honoring our agreement it seems. This is no crime, but it shows a lack of sincerity about your previously professed opinion of me.

This thread has two purposes.

1. To further the adoption of the agreement to all parties.
2. To provide a centralized place for wizardwatson and Chris Brown to have a discussion concerning the nature of the agreement.

It was established that me and you would discuss the nature, and yet when you reply directly to me, not only are you derailing, when we specifically said that the core issue would be the agreement, but you are attacking my credibility before others at the same time, violating the Greater Purpose of friendship. You say it's "more spooky" but you indicated no where in the post you pointed to what "spooky danger" you are referring to.

Again, this is no crime. I can only assume you are still drunk. You idolize your Key, and now that it has worked its power over you has increased.

Your key is not powerful. Your key is designed to find, not a sincere American. But an extremely healthy sincere American.

The Sphinx Moth meets the Ghost Orchid, perhaps?

I'm now leaning towards the opinion that you too carry fear with you. You are not scared to reveal your old man human face, but you fear to reveal your "oral histories". The "sacred" words of your precious church fathers.

I despise secrecy. If their words are truthful they should speak them openly. Illuminists, and all the other sorcerers which creep in the shadows have no power in the light. They are weak. Why would you honor their secrecy when they will not openly honor the agreement which you cherish and I have agreed to? If your agreement is the key to unity then what secret could they possess that is more sacred that warrants remaining hidden?

Your teachers have shown you the oral "histories" I know the oral "present".

You must step into the light. I will not speak of the Lord and of the Spirit in the dark.

You are right that the corporate media is poison. But it also uses (though bastardizing mostly) art. And art lives where true freedom lives. So to use art, no matter where it comes from, is not a condoning of corporate media necessarily. You have to communicate in the medium that others understand.

So the "classical" approach, of using what people know and are conditioned to is typically not useful. But sometimes it is. And to deny the classical approach simply as a reaction is but another form of conditioning that one can trap himself in.

Again, you seem to not know that you are blindfolded. And you certainly aren't giving any indication that you have a very solid picture of who I am. So let's recap.

In post #20 of this thread:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...g-the-constitution-and-starting-a-micronation

...I entered into our agreement.

In this thread #38 we established rules.
In #40 I gave you the initiative and an opening to strike.
In #55 I countered.
But it seems in #68 I've completely knocked you out. Do you plan on entering the ring again? Are we finished? If you simply "know" of the oral histories, but don't understand what Dharma Combat is truly about then why go on bragging about it?

Perhaps, you have too much fear. Or perhaps you are still deluded that you will make any progress in here with your agreement key with others. I don't think you will. Especially if you continue to ignore our agreement. People will see the lack of sincerity. I've put it right here in words, in your thread.

.....

When I entered you "club". I used the phrase "throwing down the gauntlet". Do you know what this means? It is a term used to challenge someone to a dual. Dharma combat. But also, the beginning of the r3volution revival. I appear to be way ahead of you.

But the sense in which I really meant it, you would not easily decode.

I am a sentinel of this temple. And ancient Samurai.

...metaphorically speaking of course...

A "gauntlet" is an armored glove. In order to shake your hand, I must take it off. Words have meaning. Some words have more than one. Events almost always have more than one. We don't disagree I think on 9/11. I just have an opinion about a certain layer of meaning and I don't think you're layer that you are on concerning this topic is terribly relevant to what we need to discuss.

.....

What is the first lesson in combat? To punch? To kick? To fall?

No, the first lesson is the "ready position". To stand at attention.

As I said, we are only beginning. Before you can understand and communicate you must be paying attention.

.....

You are putting the cart before the horse. That is why I asked why the Greater Purpose comes after the lesser purpose. Why is the Greater purpose protected second, and the apparently "definite" purpose protected first in the order of the sentence? Who determines whether it is "possible"? What if the majority determines that it isn't "possible"? Couldn't the remove the Greater Purpose?

3 before 1.

Things must go in order, but sometimes they get confusing.

The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

That is the order of the names and the order of glory. 1, 2, 3. The Holy Spirit testifies to the Son, the Son testifies to the Father. But why then is only blasphemy of the HOly Spirit unforgiveable? This is a great Mystery I will not delineate here.

So there are questions about your "priorities" if you catch my drift. I'm not saying that there isn't sometimes a reason to go out of order, but if the reason is valid it should make itself evident. If it doesn't become clear, then your sincerity might be in question.

.....

I will help you with your fear.

[I removed a photo from the movie Exorcist from this post 3/27/18]

If you cannot overcome your fears of cowardly men who creep in the shadows and demand you keep silent with covert rebuke, how will you overcome the fears that a Priest who exorcises demons must overcome?

My zip code is 66606 by the way.

Looking forward to your feedback. I am still interested in continuing the process. Can't really tell if you are right now.

 

[Christopher A. Brown]

Why are you derailing your own thread?

You are not honoring our agreement it seems.

Looking forward to your feedback. I am still interested in continuing the process. Can't really tell if you are right now.

Not derailing my own thread. In fact doing a lot to avoid it. I was replying and and notifying you of info pertinent to your thread. My previous 2 posts are dead centered on the thread topic here and very much a continuation of the process. No comment on that, but lots on . . . what???

I noticed the last few pages are extensive derailment, essentially spam with elements of cognitive dissonance from those who have not shown they agree with and accept prime constitutional intent, and I had nothing to do with that. All of that looks like a significant hijacking.

What about the issue of state legislators being critical to the manifestation of "alter or abolish" when Article V states, "shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof,"

Do you recognize that the intent of the Declaration of Independence must manifest through the performance of state legislators relating to the ability to propose and ratify amendments that only have constitutional intent?

 

[Anti Federalist]

The scene is a state captitol.

Five thousand protestors with signs, many say, "Time to alter or abolish, Our first right!". And, "Restore the PURPOSE of free speech. It is an amicable but passionate gathering.

What is different is that law enforcement officers are smiling and discussing issues with protestors. No animosity exists there.

That is the first thing that unnerves the legislature inside their building.

Cops in riot gear showed up perhaps for an hour or so, but left after protestors calmly and lucidly explained what they were doing.

Why?

Why is this different from a thousand other peaceful protests, where the cops in riot gear busted everybody's head and "followed orders"?

This is America after all.

My point, exactly.

 

[wizardwatson]

Not derailing my own thread. In fact doing a lot to avoid it. I was replying and and notifying you of info pertinent to your thread. My previous 2 posts are dead centered on the thread topic here and very much a continuation of the process. No comment on that, but lots on . . . what???

Do you recognize that the intent of the Declaration of Independence must manifest through the performance of state legislators relating to the ability to propose and ratify amendments that only have constitutional intent?

I noticed the last few pages are extensive derailment, essentially spam with elements of cognitive dissonance from those who have not shown they agree with and accept prime constitutional intent, and I had nothing to do with that. All of that looks like a significant hijacking.

Your only direct reply to me was #91. One whole sentence.

We designated this thread as our primary communication channel. Anything on the other threads is ancillary and largely to interact with the group. If you do not reply directly to my text, at least part of it, how am I to know you are talking to me and not the group? There was no need to give me a pointer in this thread to that one. I made it clear in this threads which threads I'm paying attention to. You giving me a pointer means you don't believe I'm checking those. And if you think that, it stands to reason you aren't taking me to seriously and also that I'm not taking you to seriously or that I'm "crazy". I'm not interested in following you around. We are speaking one to one. You are not the master of this domain. If you think age is a determining factor in anything you understand nought.

I've spent hours reading up on you. How much time have you spent reading my threads? I also believe I know have a more fundamental grasp on the mechanics involved in your litmus test than you do.

I'm not only talking to people right "now". This thread and all my threads are for future viewers as well. Because you see it as cognitive dissonance only shows your lack of attention, at the very least, and perhaps your lack of awareness in general.

I know they are all sleeping. But when they awake they will remember this dream from their sleep, as you will, and things that seem twisted will be made straight.

You claim a mystic side when you talk of the "oral traditions". Are you ashamed to talk of those things? Are you "saving" that up for the day when you succeed in your ambitions and then can tell everyone, "this is the secret to my success, I was one of the chosen to receive the blessed knowledge", blah, blah, barf.

I'm willing to answer specific questions about your idea. I have made quite a few observations already. But I will not follow you around and bend over backwards to please you by pretending that I'm not already way ahead of you in comprehending what's going on. Not here, or anywhere else.

If you fear taking me seriously in public, then you don't understand the very concept you are talking about. Do you have evidence that I'm not taking you seriously? Because I have evidence on that I'm the ONLY ONE you claim to be taking seriously, that you claim is "in sincere agreement with you". Have any others here agreed yet?

Do you not even understand the problem with doing things in the dark?

You say no one accepted "completely", but some did didn't they? They did because there was less light. You could get someone to agree pretty easy in the dark. You know why? Because then it comes down to safety in numbers. If it's just Chris and Dave in a cave, I would agree just not to make you mad. Do you see? This group, althought poisoned, is MORE bright and in the light. You had others in half-light, then agreed, and then you were booted. Makes perfect sense to me.

What this means is that less truth propagates in the dark. Because in the dark people are less willing to attack a lie for fear of persecution, and more willing to tell lies for the love of pride. So if we are to accerelerate our discussion and unfolding of truth, it is most efficient in public view on this forum.

Even if we were to talk on the phone we would have the same problem. You would be more willing to talk about meaningless crap and more willing to believe lies you are told.

You of all people should understand this best. So what we SHOULD be talking about is things you don't know or are having problems with or that you consider "great secrets". I have no great secrets. Not with you. You need to speak in code and beat around the bush and test me, go right ahead. But do it in the open. You haven't asked me any very good questions yet. And I think the reason you won't point out the errors in your idea I already see is because now you think it has more credbility because I understood it and you are afraid no one will adopt it. This is exactly the Rand Paul problem. Our movement is "half correct", so no one wants to expose Rand's problems for fear of lack of adoption. It is not hard to grasp.

But that makes your "idea" even more dangerous to you. Now that it's worked once, you've developed a false faith, not in your idea, but in your flawed strategy to propagate it.

Once you cross the river you no longer need the raft.

Plus, why do you give me your phone number if you aren't going to answer your texts?

What about the issue of state legislators being critical to the manifestation of "alter or abolish" when Article V states, "shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof,"

Woah, woah, woah. I thought we were talking about better ways to get people to agree? My only question, to simplify it for you, is that if you understand the "possible" greater purpose, how do you know they won't use "alter or abolish" to change the greater purpose? And if you understand that, why put it second in the sentence. Which I wanted to follow up with, by asking why you think the religion freedom is listed before speech.

The mystic stuff is going to be, well, mystic. I have no problem speaking plainly on your idea. But you see, we have to identify problems. If you are scared to discuss possible issues and problems because you don't want people thinking you don't know what you're talking about, then again, I have a firmer grasp on the mechanics of your litmus test than you do.

Why is it hard for you to realize or at least "entertain" the idea that I'm smarter than you? You already admitted on another thread that you dropped out of school at 8th grade. I'm not judging you for that. I'm judging you for how you are behaving.

The libertarian darling Albert J. Nock also was never formally schooled.

I, on the other hand, was the kid who spent his lunch hours in high school in the library, and being the only person who actually used the inter-library ordering system.

I cracked a NES game code algorithm in Swords and Serpents to start all my characters with 18's because the game was too hard to beat and it was annoying me.

I have never stopped studying.

I've studied everything really, quite extensively.

I'm always ready to start over.

Look at the facts. You've spent YEARS as a member of this forum. July, 2011. I've been right here year after year, month after month, and we ONLY NOW found each other. And you see my level of comprehension. Now that we're out in the open, what chance do you think there is that others are going to suddenly pop in? It was likely a one trick pony dude. I mean I will continue as well with you, I do believe it is a fundamentally sound grassroots strategy, but it is my belief me and you need to be talking about more than getting people into this.

All my spidey senses, say there's things you know that I will know more about. Perhaps, you have secrets and keys that I've been waiting for as well.

So tell me what QUESTIONS you have. What problems you see.

If you want to evaluate what I know, or if I'm sincere in certain areas, by all means. But stop saying I'm trying to cause cognitive dissonance. You look ridiculous after thanking God that you found someone like me.

 

[wizardwatson]

None of the above. It has already been clearly established that Bryan is, in fact, a reptilian ...
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?215066-Here-is-proof-that-reptilians-runs-this-forum

 

[CPUd]

Why?

Why is this different from a thousand other peaceful protests, where the cops in riot gear busted everybody's head and "followed orders"?



My point, exactly.

You missed the "calmly and lucidly" part. This is where they explain to the riot squad the 1787 constitution and abridgement of free speech. Then the people in the crowd will ask each officer if he accept the true purpose of free speech, then ones who don't will expose themselves as coginfil agents and immediately be dismissed by the ones who do.

 

[HVACTech]

I think I see the malfunction here..

agreement upon prime constitutional intent

our Constitution is simply our version of the "Rule of Law" in any given Republic.
therefore, the Constitution does not contain the "prime intent"

 

[Spikender]

Do you recognize that the intent of the Declaration of Independence must manifest through the performance of state legislators relating to the ability to propose and ratify amendments that only have constitutional intent?

Do you recognize that most of the posters taking part in this particular topic are facetious in their actions and are simply utilizing you as a practice dummy with which to sharpen their supposed wits in an attempt to shred you down and discover your true intentions and possibly your true reason for creating this topic and posing these tough questions in increasingly elaborately worded and confusing ways that make the questions themselves difficult to answer?