A lawful and peaceful revolution.

REVOLT FOR PERMISSION!

Who are the rebels? The ones trying to restore order or the ones creating disorder?

The Founders didn't rebel from order, they established it. They were called rebels because tyrants corrupt the language.

A lot of people think you need a bible to fight evil. True, in the early stages.

In the final stages you just need a dictionary.
 
Who are the rebels? The ones trying to restore order or the ones creating disorder?

The Founders didn't rebel from order, they established it. They were called rebels because tyrants corrupt the language.

A lot of people think you need a bible to fight evil. True, in the early stages.

In the final stages you just need a dictionary.


"Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. Chaos always defeats order because it is better organized." -- Terry Pratchett
 
"Chaos is found in greatest abundance wherever order is being sought. Chaos always defeats order because it is better organized." -- Terry Pratchett

Don't be such a negative Nelly.

Of course chaos is found more where order is sought. Why would you be seeking order if you already had it?

But the second statement is just "titty baby" talk (a term I picked up yesterday when daring to question the benign nature of the reputation system in a forum addicted to it).

How can chaos be better organized? If chaos is better organized then it is order and the order was chaos.

Sounds like Terry needs a dictionary too. Even writers need dictionaries. Things are getting really bad.

The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't apply to the order vs. chaos structure of universe.

Only titty babies think like that.
 
Don't be such a negative Nelly.

Of course chaos is found more where order is sought. Why would you be seeking order if you already had it?

But the second statement is just "titty baby" talk (a term I picked up yesterday when daring to question the benign nature of the reputation system in a forum addicted to it).

How can chaos be better organized? If chaos is better organized then it is order and the order was chaos.

Sounds like Terry needs a dictionary too. Even writers need dictionaries. Things are getting really bad.

The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't apply to the order vs. chaos structure of universe.

Only titty babies think like that.

You see chaos as negative.

I do not, it just is.

Entropy wins.

Cheer up!
 
Don't be a bully.

I've been asymptomatic for quite a while.

I don't go around calling everyone grassroots activists do I?

Ahem. ???????

You seem to be currently having an episode of something or another.

Burr under your blanket?
 
Last edited:
Ahem. ???????

You seem to be currently having an episode of something or another.

Burr under your blanket?

On a liberty forum where few people have a have even an intermediate understanding of the topic they claim to represent, somehow everyone is a doctor.

The confusion people have surrounding me is merely a byproduct of encountering a superior mind. And what's more, a godly mind.

An aura that makes a Nazi's face melt.

Haven't you seen Indiana Jones?
 
On a liberty forum where few people have a have even an intermediate understanding of the topic they claim to represent, somehow everyone is a doctor.

Or perhaps it was just your earlier health confessional post signature. ;)

The confusion people have surrounding me is merely a byproduct of encountering a superior mind. And what's more, a godly mind.

I share that one with you, but perhaps not the godly part. :D

An aura that makes a Nazi's face melt.

That wasn't an aura, that was an Ark. :eek:

Haven't you seen Indiana Jones?

Sure, all of them. Some more than twice.


Hang in there. The singularity approaches. :cool:
 
Hang in there. The singularity approaches. :cool:

My signatures are usually where satire meets deniability.

We all have godly potential. If we didn't, we wouldn't be aware of its absence.

You're thinking of Noah. Indiana Jones is the movie with Hans Solo.
 
So, some questions to get started:

1. Do you have the draft of the proposed preparatory amendment that is required? Basically, would like to understand this process in detail. It sounds like you've thought it out, to you have a rough draft of the actual amendment(s) proposing?

There are 3 basics amendments needed to prepare the people for proper participation in Article V. They deal with opening up the peoples information systems for the peoples purposes.

Basically all informations systems are the peoples first. Without this, dark organizations of control contrary to survival and evolution can prolificate within them and people cannot counter the darkness. Even those living in the dark suffer eventually from that. They might not care, but people do.

The 3 amendments first end the abridging of the ultimate PURPOSE of free speech, then secure the vote and reform campaign finance.

Since revision of the 1st amendment us viewed with such great contention, I've written a draft of where I think it should go. The others might best be effected in ways I do not well know of within our systems so I haven't bothered to draft amendments there. Others who know those systems far better will produce the best results.

REV. Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; Congress shall see that nothing abridges the freedom of speech and the primary methods or systems of it shall not be abridged and be first accessible for the purpose of the unity of the people in order to alter or abolish government destructive to their unalienable rights, or with its possible greater meaning through understanding one another in; forgiveness, tolerance, acceptance, respect, trust, friendship and love protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Congress shall see that nothing abridges freedom of the press in its service to the unity of the people; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances or defense of this constitution.


There is also proposed legislation for states created to become compliant. It uses state power over corporate licensure in states to compel broadcast networks to produce qualifying informations.

To qualify, a subject or information must be NOT widely available in its nature, or be so unknown that most people cannot come up with search terms. It also must be something that cannot be promoted within the average persons economic means on a scale justifying its relationship to common interests of defending vital rights.

A petition to a state legislator with a yet to be determined number of signatures which is then carried to a state Supreme Court for the production of a court order to the largest television broadcast corporation to produce a 1/2 hour or 2 hour production at current audience production standards. That is to be broadcast nationally on their network to prime time audiences for a yet to be determined number of times and repetitive schedule OR contingent upon testing of public awareness and understanding of the subject matter.

2. In post #18 you say you need 5000 Americans. Is that per state? How many do you have so far? You say the first step is to find "more and more" Americans. Is this implying you have some? Guess I'm wondering where you are in the overall plan.

We enter into the mystical again, IF there is a collective unconscious. Is support the prime intents of the constitution, of Americans conscious AND unconscious the question? If so, the latter will be hard to measure. Your notes on the timing of your composition of post #5 and agreeing with the prime constitutional intent I've set forth is as good a measure of the latter as anything.

We now find again an area of mysticism and conspiracy.

A book titled "The Hundredth Monkey" is missing from our planet. The original was published in 1962 by 23 Japanese biologists with no marketing or publicity. It was replaced by a book of the same name in 1974 written by Ken Keyes. The original was only published in 2 printings of a total of 20k copies. The replacement was published in the millions and heavily publicized. Today people only know of the replacement, not if the original which was SCIENCE documenting dream state communication between primates on a remote South Pacific island.

The replacement marginalized the phenomena by associating it with a politically charged issue relating to nuclear weapons while completely leaving out the science,

I'm sure you will agree that a conspiracy doing such a thing is of the darkest possible intentions.

There is at least one copy left on the planet and I read it. Where it went, I don't know. I read it in 1988 and did not know its full
Importance until 1998. By then the person that compelled me (yes, compelled) to read it had forgotten they ever had it. Memory, it turns out, consistently plays a major role in our evolution. It is basically controlled from the unconscious mind and in the 3rd .pdf of those posted in your 9/11 thread you will find a concept I've developed and graphically positioned called the "resolute barrier" which I believe can or mostly controls our ability to remember things.

The basics I've come to understand from the reading of the original "hundredth monkey" which I returned a few days after to read a second time, realizing how profound the research was are as follows after integrating a number if other aspects into one, whole concept.

There are 2 states. Of consciousness for living things. both are collective AND individual. Mammals have a significantly greater individual existence as groups of different genera.

Humans collective conscious comprises waking state communications of ALL types. Human collective unconscious communications have 2 types. One is individual telepathic emission which may reach many perceivers, not all necessarily need to be present, and the other is dream state communication which may be global or universal depending on the importance of it to life in the universe, to God.

The original book was obviously removed to prevent humanity from being aware of dream state influences upon conscious waking state performance. The design was to influence humanity without it conscious awareness and essentially de evolve its conscious performance and make it more controlled centering material power within specific groups of people for their purposes.

I noticed your timetable of 2 millennia in the Rabbis writings, corresponding to the influence of Christ as well as Jewish events in the later 1960's that may correspond.

There are at least 2 significant scientists that read the original book and incorporate its information in speculative advancement of the potentials. One is Rupert Sheldrake and the other I shall find the name of an edit it in to this paragraph with some specifics after I re find the info.

Accordingly, I have no idea of how many supporters of the 2 prime constitutional intents there are. I have to assume, that naturally, unconsciously, because those intents are developed human social natural law, that a large percentage of the planets human beings are supporters.

The sacred task is to make that support conscious and active socially.

I could not even venture a hues as to how many conscious supporters there are. I would speculate there are very many. Most however are very likely wrestling with their resolute barrier and fears created by the same dark forces using dream state manipulation over time, as well as conscious collective manipulation, misinformation, misleading, corruptive influences etc., that removed the original book.

The prime dream state directive programmed into populations is, Thou shalt not be causal to change." That unconscious directive is socially reinforced in a myriad of different ways with unconscious conditioning of social fears.

3. So do you think you'll be banned here as you mentioned you were when others accepted your litmus test? Maybe you will. If the Lord gives them that power. Of course you could get banned just for being an annoying poster like some others. LOL. Anyway, guess I'm also wondering what happens to these other people who have accepted your proposal?

I shall be truthful here. You are unique and the first to accept it with the full cognition you exhibit.

I thank God, and you!​

Your cognitive capacities and spiritually positive focus are exceptional so I anticipate some very interesting correlations in the mystical realm related to 9/11 and your interpretations of the a Rabbis writings.

When I originally reached out to you in post #23 you were cryptic but nothing I could unlock. You claim a "we" in #24. Is your entire network still operating in the dark? Currently we are operating in the light. Granted, 2 isn't a lot. But this is the Well of Souls. A sacred place by my estimation. I'm wondering what your real support is, and if their are others, are they on this site? If they aren't why not? We could use some real supporters here.

Anyway, it seems to me if you are alone just say so. If you aren't then what is the reason you are the only one on this site?

So those are my questions. You also seem sincere. But then again, so did many others on here in the old days, and things change. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt though.

Let me know how I can help you.

I do believe that there is an unconscious barrier to the support which exists unconsciously here and elsewhere. Since we are both cognitively addressing the constitutions intent as well as what support for it may exist, how it may exist, I can only surmise the barrier is breaking down.

Unconscious social fears assimilated at childhood control us all, with UNDERSTANDING all fears can be properly dealt with.

Your post #5 and the issue of "reputation" as well as the covert infiltrations group impositions of social fear structures invoking individual conditioning is certainly relevant to "how many" conscious supporters there are, or could be.

P.S. 2nd link in sectin D of OP is dead. See, I'm helping already. :)

Was that the salon.com link on cognitive infiltration?
 
Last edited:
Chris Posted his real pic! said:
48oZGqy.jpg

Dude, I was having like a crap evening. You just made my day.

I just want to officially say "SUCK IT" to all the posters over these 8 years who whined like babies when I said over and over and over that transparency is the key to effective social organization and you anonymous coward social mirror gazers whined about your non-existent "right to privacy".

...

Only thing I would point out is that you aren't asking any questions. Give me a target to hit as well. If you are the only one doing the punching neither of us will learn very efficiently.

Make them hard targets. I've been dreadfully bored for a good many years now.

The funnest targets are the ones that might hurt you. If you are brave enough for that. I think the photo shows this to be affirmative.

Because remember one thing. No matter how much your mind tells you the goal is to find out "what to do". The real goal is to find out "who you are".

For this act of courage I award you one coupon good for artistic direction in the form of a theme for a 30 second video of me saying something to the community. Maybe something pithy. A little diddy on my classical. A song for the weary heart. Et cetera. Et cetera.

...

Ron Paul Forums is safe because it is protected. But the very mechanism by which it is protected is why it is ineffective.

If an infiltrator is mimicking a participant to thwart action then we say this is bad.

But multiple power structures can exist. The ultimate failure of the state isn't that it is one but that it is many. It is a divided house.

When a house is divided some good neighbors can be protected by a good division looking like a bad division infiltrating a good division. And this is actually good. A lot of people forget this simple fact of multiple networks and double agents. And as we discussed before, it's irrelevant the real identity of the agents with respect to strategy. The important part is the strategy. It's only necessary to have a feel for the "space". It isn't necessary to know whether the good force is one good ghost, 10 good persons, or your imagination. Only the feel of the room is necessary.

But it still limits action. In fact it is limited even more. And here at RPF. It is limited TO THE MAXIMUM.

But why would the Lord limit the action of the core of Constitutional Liberty? Does evil win?

The stronger the system. The more powerful the potential. The more pure the participant must be. The sword cannot be drawn from the stone simply because you have found and recognize the sword.

There are many who admire truth but there are few who live by it. If a man thinks he can follow truth by speaking well of it, he fools himself. Truth does not bestow its blessings as a result of flattery but by engaging in it.

....

So we're stuck Chris because although the Lord has lit a candle in the temple, none worthy have said the right words. The reason this forum is like a dark prison full of violence and profane blashpemies against the truth is because the temple is deserted. It is an old cottage in a garden of cucumbers.

Your graphics only confuse me. If you need scientific understanding of the mind start with "only don't know". The Socratic position. Systematizing a concept of cognitive function is delusional. But zen teaches that unconciously concscious is really just a natural state. Me-ness and other-ness really on a basic level. Keeping "only don't know mind" prevents other-ness and me-ness from dominating irrationally. The confusion is with enlightenment. People think they only "reach" this ability through enlightenment. This is not true. Unconsciously conscious is every day. You only become more aware of it as the mind is cleansed. But the mind can get dirty and clean many times even from moment to moment. In unconcious and unconcsious states for long or short periods of time. That is why rebirth is the better understanding of true enlightenment and not models of what exists on a daily basis. Because rebirth involves cleansing of infirmity. This is what is meant by polishing ones mirror until not a speck remains. Enlightenment is not a "realization" of an enlightened state but awareness of the removal of an infirmity.

The hidden mystery of enlightenment is that rebirth of the Holy Spirit is the mechanism of the cleansing. To see one's true self is to see the state of oneself outside of the prison of sin. This is a rare thing and the end of a long journey. So rebirth is simply to see unconsciously conscious normalcy unblemished.

Hence the most relevant goal becomes the over-arching command of every man and woman from the seed of Adam.

You must be born again.

A buddhist seeks it but the Lord in his mercy commands it of us all.

Feedback:

1. I'm thinking of watching some movies that I've seen before. Do you have any recommendations?

2. You're an engineer. What is your theory why there is a daily anomaly in an odd place on this map that isn't where they should be? And don't say fracking that's too easy. This is from 7/21/15. 11:34pm. Just now.

UmyhzZS.png


3. If 9/11 was committed by terrorists on one level. By orchestrators on another. And by God on another...then do you think it's conceivable that your litmus test to alter or abolish was possibly engineered for another purpose than to alter or abolish.

That's all for now. I may address the last post. Got carried away after seeing your picture. I honestly forgot most of what it said now.
 
Incorrect, the Nazis opened the Ark of the Covenant, and got melted by the spooky spirits and whatever else was in there. Watch it again. :p :)

raiders of the lost ark
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en......1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.6.1046.yPgXCSDp4kM

Oh, so I say aura and you correct me with ark, but now it's spirits, which is a lot closer to aura than ark. It was analogy. Why you gotta be an analogy Nazi? 100% likeness is not a requirement.

Don't make me melt your face.
 
Oh, so I say aura and you correct me with ark, but now it's spirits, which is a lot closer to aura than ark. It was analogy. Why you gotta be an analogy Nazi? 100% likeness is not a requirement.

Don't make me melt your face.


Because as a 40+ year, now retired, computer programmer/systems analyst, I learned very early on that accuracy and very minor details make a whole lot of difference, in the outcomes.

Say what you mean, mean what you say, and do what you say you're gonna do.

Tighten up your syntax there, Kiddo.
 
First of all, you must gather a critical mass of folks that are actually pro-American. Not neo-cons or "libertarians" that support open borders and the death of the nation.
The founding fathers were clear on that point-of open borders and being ruled by merchants.
 
First of all, you must gather a critical mass of folks that are actually pro-American. Not neo-cons or "libertarians" that support open borders and the death of the nation.
The founding fathers were clear on that point-of open borders and being ruled by merchants.

Me and Chris are the only two people so far who even accept the premise of liberty. Do you as well? It is defined in the OP.

Your first statement is truthful, and is in line with the spirit of the OP. Your conclusions thereafter are of questionable origin.

You have arrived at a very weird time. What is the reason? Why active now but member since 2013 with only 59 posts?
 
Me and Chris are the only two people so far who even accept the premise of liberty. Do you as well? It is defined in the OP.

Your first statement is truthful, and is in line with the spirit of the OP. Your conclusions thereafter are of questionable origin.

You have arrived at a very weird time. What is the reason? Why active now but member since 2013 with only 59 posts?

What "conclusion" are you referring to? The reason? Are you trolling me?
 
Back
Top