A critical study of the Bible

As I understand it, these two quotes from the scriptures may have a lot to do with it.



At first, when writing the scriptures, the writers would replace His name with ADONAI. Soon people thought perhaps since there is only one God, the word God itself may be thought of as His name and just to be sure they were never taking His name in vain, they would leave out the vowel.

Also an English translation of the name of God may be YHWH, which has no vowels. But I think you are correct that it's about taking His name in vain.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYkbqzWVHZI

I think uttering the name even if you get it wrong is hardly taking it in Vain. Vain means you are cursing it, using it as a curse, or speaking ill of it.

That's the way I see it too.

People often take things to the extreme. Here is a quote from the scriptures about something people carried out the extreme.
Exodus 35:3 Ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day.
And another.....
Numbers 15:32-35 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. 33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation. 34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him. 35 And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
Putting these things together, many even today unscrew the light bulb in their refrigerators so they don't kindle a fire.
 
As I understand it, these two quotes from the scriptures may have a lot to do with it.



At first, when writing the scriptures, the writers would replace His name with ADONAI. Soon people thought perhaps since there is only one God, the word God itself may be thought of as His name and just to be sure they were never taking His name in vain, they would leave out the vowel.

thank you! I am extremely ignorant of all faith, but especially the jewish faith.

I'm curious why Christianity didn't preserve this view. I understand the New Testament radically modified the law, but much of the Old Testament is still considered sacred to Christianity, such as the commandments.
 
The Laws and the Covenants

thank you! I am extremely ignorant of all faith, but especially the jewish faith.

I'm curious why Christianity didn't preserve this view. I understand the New Testament radically modified the law, but much of the Old Testament is still considered sacred to Christianity, such as the commandments.

Well, you have asked a very good question, and one that takes a bit of explanation. I will try to explain it by using the scriptures.

The Laws and the Covenants

All quotes are taken from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. Added emphasis is mine. Note numbers have been removed for clarity.

Luke 16:16-17 “The law and the prophets were in effect until John came; since then the good news of the kingdom of God is proclaimed, and everyone tries to enter it by force. 17 But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away, than for one stroke of a letter in the law to be dropped. ([N]RSV)

Notice from the above verses, the old law is not removed but just no longer in effect. It is still needed to show how we came to our present state of grace.

Romans 6:14 For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace. ([N]RSV)

Here Paul explains that we are no longer under the law but instead under grace.

Romans 7:4-6 In the same way, my friends, you have died to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, to him who has been raised from the dead in order that we may bear fruit for God. 5 While we were living in the flesh, our sinful passions, aroused by the law, were at work in our members to bear fruit for death. 6 But now we are discharged from the law, dead to that which held us captive, so that we are slaves not under the old written code but in the new life of the Spirit. ([N]RSV)

We have died to the law through the body of Christ, we are no longer held by the law and it enslaves us no more.

Romans 8:1-5 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. 3 For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and to deal with sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit. ([N]RSV)

We are free from the law of sin and death! We have new commandments and no longer have to be slaves to the old written laws.

Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes. ([N]RSV)

Jesus put an end to our having to be slaves to the old written law.

Romans 13:8 Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. ([N]RSV)

Here is the new law (commandment).

Romans 13:10 Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law. ([N]RSV)

Again we are reminded of the new law (commandment). This is now written in our hearts. Our old stony hearts are now fleshy hearts just as the old law was written on stone, the new law is written in our hearts. (see the parallel)

1 Corinthians 9:20-21 To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though I myself am not under the law) so that I might win those under the law. 21 To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law) so that I might win those outside the law. ([N]RSV)

Here Paul tells how he is only bound by Christ’s law. The law of Jesus is easy to remember. It is in our hearts and not written on paper or stone.

Galatians 2:16 yet we know that a person is justified not by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ. And we have come to believe in Christ Jesus, so that we might be justified by faith in Christ,and not by doing the works of the law, because no one will be justified by the works of the law. ([N]RSV)

We are not justified by the works of the law but through our faith in Jesus the Christ.

Galatians 3:5 Well then, does God supply you with the Spirit and work miracles among you by your doing the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard? ([N]RSV)

Are we justified by the written law or by believing (faith) in what we heard?

Galatians 3:10-13 For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not observe and obey all the things written in the book of the law.11 Now it is evident that no one is justified before God by the law; for “The one who is righteous will live by faith.12 But the law does not rest on faith; on the contrary, “Whoever does the works of the law will live by them.13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us -- for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree” -- ([N]RSV))

If we remain under the works of the law, then we are under a curse! We can no longer observe all of the things written in the book of the law. Even when there was a temple and the ability to have sacrifices, those of the old covenant were not even able to do so.

Galatians 3:23-24 Now before faith came, we were imprisoned and guarded under the law until faith would be revealed. 24 Therefore the law was our disciplinarian until Christ came, so that we might be justified by faith. ([N]RSV)

Jesus set us free from the guardianship of the law. There is no need for the tutor after we have graduated to being justified by faith.

Galatians 4:10 You are observing special days, and months, and seasons, and years. ([N]RSV)

Paul was disappointed by those who after he had been with them were still keeping the ‘Holy Days’ of the old covenant laws.

Galatians 4:21 Tell me, you who desire to be subject to the law, will you not listen to the law? ([N]RSV)

Those who would be subject to the old covenant laws did not listen to those laws nor do them. Now, instead of listening to the new law Jesus has given us, they continue to cling to the old laws.

Galatians 5:3-4 Once again I testify to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obliged to obey the entire law. 4 You who want to be justified by the law have cut yourselves off from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. ([N]RSV)

Those who would continue on with the old covenant laws have fallen away from grace.

Galatians 5:14 For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” ([N]RSV)

Here is the law we are to have written in our hearts. There are actually two…. The first one is to love God with all your heart soul and strength. These two are the laws (commandments) Jesus wants us to keep. These are the commandments referred to in the book of Revelation.

Galatians 5:18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not subject to the law. ([N]RSV)

If we are truly led by the spirit, we should not subject ourselves to the written law of the old covenant.

Ephesians 2:15-16 He has abolished the law with its commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new humanity in place of the two, thus making peace, 16 and might reconcile both groups to God in one body through the cross, thus putting to death that hostility through it. ([N]RSV)

I urge you to check what the above verse implies for yourself.

Titus 3:9 But avoid stupid controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, for they are unprofitable and worthless. ([N]RSV)

We are told to avoid controversies about the old written law and such as they are not profitable for anything. (something we are guilty of at this time)

2 Corinthians 2:17 - 3:8 For we are not peddlers of God’s word like so many; but in Christ we speak as persons of sincerity, as persons sent from God and standing in his presence. 1 Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Surely we do not need, as some do, letters of recommendation to you or from you, do we? 2 You yourselves are our letter, written on our hearts, to be known and read by all; 3 and you show that you are a letter of Christ, prepared by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts. 4 Such is the confidence that we have through Christ toward God. 5 Not that we are competent of ourselves to claim anything as coming from us; our competence is from God, 6 who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of letter but of spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. 7 Now if the ministry of death, chiseled in letters on stone tablets, came in glory so that the people of Israel could not gaze at Moses’ face because of the glory of his face, a glory now set aside, 8 how much more will the ministry of the Spirit come in glory? ([N]RSV)

This confirms the stone tablets are also part of the old covenant written law.

Jeremiah 31:31-33 The days are surely coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. 32 It will not be like the covenant that I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt -- a covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, says the LORD. 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. ([N]RSV)

We may see from these verses, there is nothing new in what Paul is saying. The new covenant was prophesied in the book of Jeremiah.

Hebrews 8:10 This is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. ([N]RSV)

Paul is showing how the prophecy has been fulfilled .

Hebrews 8:13 In speaking of “a new covenant,” he has made the first one obsolete. And what is obsolete and growing old will soon disappear. ([N]RSV)

The old covenant became obsolete when Jesus died and then later it disappeared with the destruction of the second temple. It was no longer able to be followed. All of the sacrifices were unable to be observed nor any of the temple services of the old covenant.

Hebrews 9:1-4 Now even the first covenant had regulations for worship and an earthly sanctuary. 2 For a tent was constructed, the first one, in which were the lampstand, the table, and the bread of the Presence; this is called the Holy Place. 3 Behind the second curtain was a tent called the Holy of Holies. 4 In it stood the golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant overlaid on all sides with gold, in which there were a golden urn holding the manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tablets of the covenant; ([N]RSV)

Again it is confirmed the tablets of stone were of the old covenant. This old covenant is finished and we are now living by the new covenant.

Hebrews 10:16 "This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds," ([N]RSV)

Just as God said He would, He sent His son and made a new covenant with His people. He confirmed it with many in the last of the seventy weeks. He wrote it in their hearts and not on tablets of stone as before.

Please be aware, I am not saying the Sabbath was not sanctified by God as a Holy day. It was sanctified by God right after the sixth day of creation. What I am saying is we should not keep the old covenant laws concerning how it is to be observed. One may work, build a fire or anything else one normally would do, even on the Sabbath. What we must do is remember the Sabbath is sanctified by God as Holy! I am not saying we should observe a pagan day rather than the Sabbath for the day we should have church services we may have church on any of the days of the week as long as we don’t acknowledge that day of the week as being sacred to a pagan god.

We have but one what may be called ‘Holy Day’ now. This day is the day when we observe what may be called the ‘Christian Passover’. By eating the bread and drinking the wine we are to remember the sacrifice Jesus made for us and the reason He made it. This day is not just to be observed once a year as we may have been told, but rather as often as needed to remind us of the sacrifice God made when He gave His son as the final sacrifice to save us from slavery. This freedom is not just to the slavery of sin, but also from the slavery to the laws of the old covenant. Continuing to keep the old written laws of the old covenant is refusing to accept the grace Jesus died to give us through His body and blood. Refusing to accept the new covenant, we curse ourselves by rejecting His gift.

We are now free from all of the burdens of slavery to laws and sin. We have in us a heart not of stone but of flesh and written in or on our hearts and minds are the commandments of our Lord Jesus the Christ. We are not subject to any of the old laws written on stone or by Moses on paper. Instead, we have the Holy Spirit as our guide and know in our hearts what is righteous and thus what we should do. If perhaps we slip, we know it is our flesh that has made the slip and not of our spirit. Yes, we are to remember the old laws, written on the tablets, for if we did not know what they said, we would not have known sin.

Should we continue to sin because we are free from the law? Of course not!

Let’s think of a little story to illustrate the situation:

A certain man owned a store where when we were kids, we would go in and take what we wanted and put the things in our pockets without paying. The man knew we were taking those things but didn’t say anything, thinking he would wait till later to talk to our parents about the problem. Later, we learn the man knew we had taken those things and is going to talk to our parents about the problem. After we had learned the man was going to talk to our parents, his son goes to him and pays for everything we took and tells him the account is settled. Should we now after learning how his son has redeemed us from the consequences of our wrong doing, go back to the store and continue to steal from the store owner? We should know from this point, we were wrong and not intentionally do what we had done before.

We need to understand the old covenant is gone and behind us and accept the new covenant as it was made with us. There is no need to observe what the people of Israel accepted as the first covenant as they broke it and a new covenant was established to replace it. We are now members of the family of Abraham and heirs to the promise. As members of Israel, we have a new covenant and should observe it because the old covenant has been abandoned.

Further proof of the abandonment of the old covenant follows.

Magnesians is a letter written in the early 100's C.E.

Ignatius to the Magnesians (long) 9:4 And after the observance of the Sabbath, let every friend of Christ keep the Lord's Day as a festival, the resurrection-day, the queen and chief of all the days of the week.

Notice how the Sabbath is still on the seventh day of the week, but the first day of the week is the Lord's Day.

Ignatius to the Magnesians 9:1-2 If, therefore, those who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord's Day, on which also our life has sprung up again by Him and by His death - whom some deny, by which mystery we have obtained faith, and therefore endure, that we may be found the disciples of Jesus Christ, our only Master - 2 how shall we be able to live apart from Him, whose disciples the prophets themselves in the Spirit did wait for Him as their Teacher? And therefore He whom they rightly waited for, being come, raised them from the dead.

Ignatius to the Trallians (long) 9:2 He also rose again in three days, the Father raising Him up; and after spending forty days with the apostles, He was received up to the Father, and "sat down at His right hand, expecting till His enemies are placed under His feet." On the day of the preparation, then, at the third hour, He received the sentence from Pilate, the Father permitting that to happen; at the sixth hour He was crucified; at the ninth hour He gave up the ghost; and before sunset He was buried. During the Sabbath He continued under the earth in the tomb in which Joseph of Arimathaea had laid Him. At the dawning of the Lord's day He arose from the dead, according to what was spoken by Himself, "As Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man also be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." The day of the preparation, then, comprises the passion; the Sabbath embraces the burial; the Lord's Day contains the resurrection.

The Didache was written around the years 50–160 CE, most likely 75 CE.

Didache 14:1-3 But every Lord's day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure. 2 But let no one that is at variance with his fellow come together with you, until they be reconciled, that your sacrifice may not be profaned. 3 For this is that which was spoken by the Lord: In every place and time offer to me a pure sacrifice; for I am a great King, saith the Lord, and my name is wonderful among the nations.

This proves the Sabbath was not changed to Sunday by the Roman Catholic Church, as is often claimed by many who hold fast to the Saturday Sabbath.
 
Last edited:
Well, you have asked a very good question, and one that takes a bit of explanation. I will try to explain it by using the scriptures.

The Laws and the Covenants

All quotes are taken from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. Added emphasis is mine. Note numbers have been removed for clarity.



Notice from the above verses, the old law is not removed but just no longer in effect. It is still needed to show how we came to our present state of grace.



Here Paul explains that we are no longer under the law but instead under grace.



We have died to the law through the body of Christ, we are no longer held by the law and it enslaves us no more.



We are free from the law of sin and death! We have new commandments and no longer have to be slaves to the old written laws.



Jesus put an end to our having to be slaves to the old written law.



Here is the new law (commandment).



Again we are reminded of the new law (commandment). This is now written in our hearts. Our old stony hearts are now fleshy hearts just as the old law was written on stone, the new law is written in our hearts. (see the parallel)



Here Paul tells how he is only bound by Christ’s law. The law of Jesus is easy to remember. It is in our hearts and not written on paper or stone.



We are not justified by the works of the law but through our faith in Jesus the Christ.



Are we justified by the written law or by believing (faith) in what we heard?



If we remain under the works of the law, then we are under a curse! We can no longer observe all of the things written in the book of the law. Even when there was a temple and the ability to have sacrifices, those of the old covenant were not even able to do so.



Jesus set us free from the guardianship of the law. There is no need for the tutor after we have graduated to being justified by faith.



Paul was disappointed by those who after he had been with them were still keeping the ‘Holy Days’ of the old covenant laws.



Those who would be subject to the old covenant laws did not listen to those laws nor do them. Now, instead of listening to the new law Jesus has given us, they continue to cling to the old laws.



Those who would continue on with the old covenant laws have fallen away from grace.



Here is the law we are to have written in our hearts. There are actually two…. The first one is to love God with all your heart soul and strength. These two are the laws (commandments) Jesus wants us to keep. These are the commandments referred to in the book of Revelation.



If we are truly led by the spirit, we should not subject ourselves to the written law of the old covenant.



I urge you to check what the above verse implies for yourself.



We are told to avoid controversies about the old written law and such as they are not profitable for anything. (something we are guilty of at this time)



This confirms the stone tablets are also part of the old covenant written law.



We may see from these verses, there is nothing new in what Paul is saying. The new covenant was prophesied in the book of Jeremiah.



Paul is showing how the prophecy has been fulfilled .



The old covenant became obsolete when Jesus died and then later it disappeared with the destruction of the second temple. It was no longer able to be followed. All of the sacrifices were unable to be observed nor any of the temple services of the old covenant.



Again it is confirmed the tablets of stone were of the old covenant. This old covenant is finished and we are now living by the new covenant.



Just as God said He would, He sent His son and made a new covenant with His people. He confirmed it with many in the last of the seventy weeks. He wrote it in their hearts and not on tablets of stone as before.

Please be aware, I am not saying the Sabbath was not sanctified by God as a Holy day. It was sanctified by God right after the sixth day of creation. What I am saying is we should not keep the old covenant laws concerning how it is to be observed. One may work, build a fire or anything else one normally would do, even on the Sabbath. What we must do is remember the Sabbath is sanctified by God as Holy! I am not saying we should observe a pagan day rather than the Sabbath for the day we should have church services we may have church on any of the days of the week as long as we don’t acknowledge that day of the week as being sacred to a pagan god.

We have but one what may be called ‘Holy Day’ now. This day is the day when we observe what may be called the ‘Christian Passover’. By eating the bread and drinking the wine we are to remember the sacrifice Jesus made for us and the reason He made it. This day is not just to be observed once a year as we may have been told, but rather as often as needed to remind us of the sacrifice God made when He gave His son as the final sacrifice to save us from slavery. This freedom is not just to the slavery of sin, but also from the slavery to the laws of the old covenant. Continuing to keep the old written laws of the old covenant is refusing to accept the grace Jesus died to give us through His body and blood. Refusing to accept the new covenant, we curse ourselves by rejecting His gift.

We are now free from all of the burdens of slavery to laws and sin. We have in us a heart not of stone but of flesh and written in or on our hearts and minds are the commandments of our Lord Jesus the Christ. We are not subject to any of the old laws written on stone or by Moses on paper. Instead, we have the Holy Spirit as our guide and know in our hearts what is righteous and thus what we should do. If perhaps we slip, we know it is our flesh that has made the slip and not of our spirit. Yes, we are to remember the old laws, written on the tablets, for if we did not know what they said, we would not have known sin.

Should we continue to sin because we are free from the law? Of course not!

Let’s think of a little story to illustrate the situation:

A certain man owned a store where when we were kids, we would go in and take what we wanted and put the things in our pockets without paying. The man knew we were taking those things but didn’t say anything, thinking he would wait till later to talk to our parents about the problem. Later, we learn the man knew we had taken those things and is going to talk to our parents about the problem. After we had learned the man was going to talk to our parents, his son goes to him and pays for everything we took and tells him the account is settled. Should we now after learning how his son has redeemed us from the consequences of our wrong doing, go back to the store and continue to steal from the store owner? We should know from this point, we were wrong and not intentionally do what we had done before.

We need to understand the old covenant is gone and behind us and accept the new covenant as it was made with us. There is no need to observe what the people of Israel accepted as the first covenant as they broke it and a new covenant was established to replace it. We are now members of the family of Abraham and heirs to the promise. As members of Israel, we have a new covenant and should observe it because the old covenant has been abandoned.

Further proof of the abandonment of the old covenant follows.

Magnesians is a letter written in the early 100's C.E.



Notice how the Sabbath is still on the sixth day of the week, but the first day of the week is the Lord's Day.





The Didache was written around the years 50–160 CE, most likely 75 CE.



This proves the Sabbath was not changed to Sunday by the Roman Catholic Church, as is often claimed by many who hold fast to the Saturday Sabbath.

All you've done is proven that the Sabbath was changed by man after Jesus had left for heaven and all of the original disciples were dead. Acts and Hebrews 4 verify that while the apostles were still alive the Sabbath was still the 7th day. And Jesus declared himself to be Lord of the Sabbath. (Hence "The Lord's Day" initially meant Sabbath). The reason for the change later was initially for early Christians to differentiate themselves from Jews who were being crucified. A good book on this is From Sabbath to Sunday by Samuel Bacchiochi. http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/sabbath_to_sunday/

The fact is that the Catholic church itself teaches that it changed the Sabbath and the Catholic church claims people like Ignatius to the Trallians to be Catholic. Holding up evidence of extra Biblical church tradition doesn't change the veracity of that claim even if you believe the particular tradition was "pre Catholic".


Further Ignatius introduced the error of elevating one church member over other in direct contradiction to Christ's teaching of servant leadership. Note that in his Epistle he stressed that people be "subject to the bishop as to Jesus Christ". (See: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0106.htm) It claims the change based on the power of church tradition.

While Paul did mention the position of bishop, he never said anything about the idea that people should be "subject" to bishops and he most definitely didn't elevate the position of bishop to being equivalent to Jesus. The New Testament makes it clear that Christ is the head of the church. Not some bishop.

I suggest we keep this thread on the Bible and not delve into church tradition.
 
Last edited:
All you've done is proven that the Sabbath was changed by man after Jesus had left for heaven and all of the original disciples were dead. Acts and Hebrews 4 verify that while the apostles were still alive the Sabbath was still the 7th day. And Jesus declared himself to be Lord of the Sabbath. (Hence "The Lord's Day" initially meant Sabbath). The reason for the change later was initially for early Christians to differentiate themselves from Jews who were being crucified. A good book on this is From Sabbath to Sunday by Samuel Bacchiochi. http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/sabbath_to_sunday/
I have that book and have read it.
The fact is that the Catholic church itself teaches that it changed the Sabbath and the Catholic church claims people like Ignatius to the Trallians to be Catholic. Note that in his Epistle he stressed that people be "subject to the bishop as to Jesus Christ". (See: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0106.htm)

While Paul did mention the position of bishop, he never said anything about the idea that people should be "subject" to bishops and he most definitely didn't elevate the position of bishop to being equivalent to Jesus. I suggest we keep this thread on the Bible and not delve into church tradition.

http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/sabbath_to_sunday/

Besides, the OP was about critical analysis of the Bible. Not critical analysis of
I had nearly decided to leave off the part "Further proof of the abandonment of the old covenant follows." but decided to add it anyway. The Church of Rome did not become corrupted till the 4th century, so I thought it would be safe to assume those fellows were not part of what happened from that point forward.

I was asked a question and I answered it the best I could. If that makes me a bad guy... then so be it.

Now do you have any problem with what I explained before the part you objected to that falls below "Further proof of the abandonment of the old covenant follows." If so, please tell me about that.
 
Last edited:
snip~

Further Ignatius introduced the error of elevating one church member over other in direct contradiction to Christ's teaching of servant leadership. Note that in his Epistle he stressed that people be "subject to the bishop as to Jesus Christ". (See: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0106.htm) It claims the change based on the power of church tradition.

While Paul did mention the position of bishop, he never said anything about the idea that people should be "subject" to bishops and he most definitely didn't elevate the position of bishop to being equivalent to Jesus. The New Testament makes it clear that Christ is the head of the church. Not some bishop.

I suggest we keep this thread on the Bible and not delve into church tradition.

I agree with you in that the doctrine of the Nicolaitans crept into the church long before the 4th century, as evidenced in the letter to Pergamos in Revelation 2:12. A church hierarchy should not exist except that it be a servant to the members of the church.
 
Now do you have any problem with what I explained before the part you objected to that falls below "Further proof of the abandonment of the old covenant follows." If so, please tell me about that.

I don't object, but I think it's incomplete. When Jesus was asked what was the greatest law He said:

“‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” (Matt 22:37-40)

Now how do you show love for God? Well here is what Jesus said:

15If ye love me, keep my commandments. (John 14:15)

And further:

21He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him. (John 14:21)

Now let's look at the commandments. Not all 600+ that the Jews had by the time Jesus came to earth. (Which is why He said Matthew 15:9
But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
) But the simple 10 commandments given in Exodus 20. Forget the 4th for a moment since that one is controversial. Can you see the connection between the other 9 and love for God and your fellow man? If you love God are you going to put Bael or Zeus or money or fame before Him? Are you going to worship stuff made by human hands whether it Molech or Asteroth or your new Lamborgini? Are you going to use His name to express your anger? Will to take His name in vain another way by claiming Christianity but making no attempt to live it? (And yes I know that I personally fail to live up to the name Christian, but I try not to). Either 4 or 5 of the other 6 commandments have been incorporated into our laws one way or another. Murder, stealing and perjury are all against the law. Adultery is still illegal in some states, although not enforced. But it still can come up in divorce even in so called "no fault" states, especially with regards to child custody. There is no law per se requiring children honor their parents, but minors are legally subject to their parents. The command against coveting is a thought crime and cannot be directly incorporated into law (nor should it be).

I agree with your point about the law being written on our hearts. But what does that mean? When Jesus came he dispensed with a lot of the traditions that were either added wholesale by the religious leaders, or that were part of the sacrificial system meant to point to him. But other parts of the law he strengthened. Murder was strengthened to include hatred. Adultery was strengthened to include lust. (See Matthew 5). When the rich young ruler came to Jesus, Jesus realized that he had unknowingly made a god of his wealth. So Jesus told him to sell what he had and give to the poor. When the young man was unwilling to do this and turned away, the disciples asked "Who can be saved?" Jesus replied that with man this was impossible, but with God all things are possible. (See Luke 18). Keeping the spirit of the law (as opposed to just the letter) is possible only if God puts the law in our hearts (seat of our mind). After all, it is from the heart that evil comes out. (Matthew 15:19) If hateful/lustful thoughts can be controlled then hateful/lustful acts will never happen.

Note, while this is called the "new covenant", it isn't really that new. Enoch had this kind of relationship with God, and God just took him to heaven without him dying. Moses had such a relationship that when God was ready to destroy the rebellious Israelites, Moses offered to die in their place. Hebrews 11 is all about old testament characters who lived "by faith". So why wasn't this generally true? Because most people didn't want that. When God spoke directly to the children of Israel, they told Moses they didn't want direction communication with God, and that they would prefer that he speak to God for them. (Exodus 20:19) But under the new covenant there is no Moses or Aaron or Joshua. There is just you and your high priest Jesus. (Hebrews 4:14)

God's love in your heart is what is supposed to motivate you. It's not supposed to be some mechanical checklist. But those observing you should at some point see similar results. The law still exists because it shows you what sin is. (Romans 7:7) Further in Romans 2 Paul points out that even people who don't know God keep the law having learned it "through nature". Paul went further to talk about the "circumcision of the heart" which helps one keep the "spirit of the law" rather than just the letter. (Romans 2:29)

So, that's my understanding of the new covenant. It is introspective rather than inquisitive. We are supposed to concentrate on getting the 2x4 out of our own eye rather than getting the speck of sawdust out of our brother's eye. (Matthew 7:3) And rather than condemning anyone standing in fear of our condemnation, we should tell them that we don't condemn them and admonish them to "sin no more". (John 18:11)
 
Last edited:
Folks, lets not forget that the Bible is composed of 'selected' books. There are many books which were not included in the cannon due to group consensus. Perhaps some of those other books should have been selected over the cannon—as they may be more consistent.
 
We are no longer under the law. But, my question is this: Are the Ten Commandments part of the law or are they separate?

It seems the law is still in effect:

"It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 NAB)

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. (Matthew 5:17 NAB)
 
It seems the law is still in effect:

"It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 NAB)

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. (Matthew 5:17 NAB)

Kevin...good stuff. What do you make of the book of "Hebrews"? The author claims we are no longer under the law. Did the "law" die with Jesus on the cross?
 
Kevin...good stuff. What do you make of the book of "Hebrews"? The author claims we are no longer under the law. Did the "law" die with Jesus on the cross?

Here's a verse in Hebrews where the Holy Spirit basically says the laws are here to stay:

“This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.” (Hebrews 10:16 NIV)

He adds on “Their sins and lawless acts I will remember no more.”, so your sins died on the cross, but not the law.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top