Jordan Liberty
Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages
- 89
Well, sorry to say, but those electors will soon lose their positions...
Hypothetically, if this occurs it will raise questions from a populace that is already fed up, but doesn't yet completely understand the answer.Understandable, but I think there are some who act without consideration of future consequences. Hypothetically, if this occurs and there is outrage from the average voter over it and we lose Rand, Davis, Massie, Amash, Bentivolio, etc because the GOP aggressively primaries every single one of our guys in 14 & 16, was it worth it?
Hypothetically, if this occurs it will raise questions from a populace that is already fed up, but doesn't yet completely understand the answer.
We can handle the spin machine. People here have been doing it for years now.
Look, I'm normally one of the more pragmatic ones here myself, with regard to Rand, initially treading carefully about a 3rd party run, etc., but there becomes a point where you have so much shit thrown at you that you just have to say "DON'T TREAD ON ME!"I tend to look at things in a risk vs reward way. I see the risk (in a worst case scenario) being that the term "Ron Paul supporter" becomes a "Scarlet Letter" for elected officials and candidates costing us seats in Congress and in the State legislatures.
I'm not sure if I see what the potential reward is though.
Again this is assuming the hypothetical situation where the faithless electors throw the election to Congress and we end up with Romney/Biden as the article suggests.
Look, I'm normally one of the more pragmatic ones here myself, with regard to Rand, initially treading carefully about a 3rd party run, etc., but there becomes a point where you have so much shit thrown at you that you just have to say "DON'T TREAD ON ME!"
Anyways, it's not yours or my call. These folks have spent countless hours and lots of money, and so if they feel that enough is enough and they need to have their voices heard about all of the cheating, then I support them 100%.
BTW, there is always reward in standing up for what is right, and against those who have reatly wronged you. We can handle and combat the negative PR, jsut the same as the newsletters.... Hell, given the wya they want to jsut pretend we don't exist, they probably won't even want to report it unless it does in fact create a spectacle. If it does, then we will be ready and waiting to put into proper perspective what really took place. The truth is on our side, and they can't prove lies.
This is all for not. Rmoney's not going to win anyway.
Understandable, but I think there are some who act without consideration of future consequences. Hypothetically, if this occurs and there is outrage from the average voter over it and we lose Rand, Davis, Massie, Amash, Bentivolio, etc because the GOP aggressively primaries every single one of our guys in 14 & 16, was it worth it?
Yes. Obviously! What are you talking about? I will tell you what you are talking about and exactly where you are coming from, CaptLou:And what if their state has a law stating that electors should adhere to the results of the popular vote? Would you support those electors who wish to vote their own preference instead of what the voters of the state chose?
We tried getting their respect by being nice, playing by their rules, and being very respectful to them. In return they spat in our face and treated us like shit. It's virtually impossible to make any kind of "progress" when there is such blatant disrespect for us, and their every action is telling us to fuck off.
Costing them the election isn't just about pissing in their cheerios. Though that's certainly a bonus. It tells the Republican Party that they can either learn to treat us with respect, or lose every single election from this point forward.
It's also an educational opportunity. Many people only really pay attention to someone else's opposing ideas after the person stands up for himself.
Additionally, as a long term strategy, if the Republican party continues to disrespect us and not want us in their party, but we guarantee their loss in every presidential election this point forward, guess what will happen? People will start to leave the Republican party, and some of these people will come to our side. Congratulations, we just broke the two party system.
there becomes a point where you have so much shit thrown at you that you just have to say "DON'T TREAD ON ME!"
there is always reward in standing up for what is right, and against those who have reatly wronged you.
Yes. Obviously! What are you talking about? I will tell you what you are talking about and exactly where you are coming from, CaptLou:
1: You are old
2: You are GOP
3: You are stuck in the old conventional mainstream mode ofthoughtnon-thought
4: You have far more respect for "the law" than it deserves. "The law" deserves your contempt, your hatred, and your revulsion. It deserves absolutely no respect.
5: You put far too much priority on not upsetting the apple carts of those stuck in the evil and stupid conventional mainstream mode.
6: None of the above will change, because you are old, you are GOP, and you are stuck in your ways (see 1-3).
All the Ron Paul electors should vote their conscience. what's more, I believe they actually will!! It will be fantastic. Let the mainstream maggots squirm.
It could also wind up causing major rifts in the future which will alienate any candidate remotely connected to Ron Paul.
This is all for not. Rmoney's not going to win anyway.
So you (not you particuarly) cry when voters are disenfranchised,
They brought this upon themselves and neocons don't want to build bridges, they love to tear them down (and then profit of course).
So respecting the law is bowing down to those who break it and rewrite it when it suits them? Ummm, okay....So you (not you particuarly) cry when voters are disenfranchised, but then again wish to do the same when it benefits your agenda? Does not make much sense to me. And yes, I respect the law, especially when that law was held up as Constitutional. We are a nation of laws, and respect for the law is one of the principles of conservatism.
are you talking about elected delegates being removed by party bosses?
are you talking about rewriting the rules after the fact to change the outcome?
or are you talking about respecting a delegates right to vote how he/she feels?
And what if their state has a law stating that electors should adhere to the results of the popular vote? Would you support those electors who wish to vote their own preference instead of what the voters of the state chose?
So respecting the law is bowing down to those who break it and rewrite it when it suits them? Ummm, okay....