I am not trying to debate logically with you, I am mocking you.
Change the rules, or in the case defnitions, as you go eh haha. Looks like yet another fallacy, perhaps a false dilemma. Lets pull this out and take a look shall we? Either you love the project of hate the project (didn't Bush say that too??), isn't that what you are saying? Aren't you suggesting there isn't another choice? Perhaps, I like the blimp idea, but I don't like the way it has been conducted? See, false dilemma.
Wow, you think this is some logical debate... I am tired of using logic on the hordes of anti-blimp trolls. You guys are a nnuisance.
Here is soem logic you cant beat, no matter how you define it
If you dont like it, you do not have to donate!
In case you missed it the first 10 times, which obviously you did (is that another ad hominem)
If you dont like it, you do not have to donate!
One more time, for good measure
If you dont like it, you do not have to donate!
In spanish:
¡Si usted se puso lo quiere, usted no tiene que donar!
In french
Si vous avez mis l'aimez, vous n'avez pas à faire don de !
katakana?
もしあなたそれのようなdontならば、あなたは寄付しなくてもよいです!
Please tell me, what part of this english phrase are you not understanding?
And if you do understand it, tell me how your bitching and moaning abotu the way it is being done helps Ron Paul get elected, at all!