Your views on marriage

[Ibn.AL.Muqafaa]

I personally think, if a couple wants to get married should do so, I don't want the government to intervene.

 

[Lamp]

yeah sure why not. lets go with that.

 

[euphemia]

I'm not a fan of government defining relationships, but marriage is not as simple as just being together. What happens when the relationship dissolves through death or divorce? Who gets the stuff? Who gets the kids? Who pays child support?

 

[Danke]

 

[Suzanimal]

No government involvement. Personally, I don't give a crap if you marry your fish as long as I don't have to hear about it.

 

[timosman]

An excellent thread. We should spend more time rehashing the basics. 5 stars.

 

[donnay]

I'm not a fan of government defining relationships, but marriage is not as simple as just being together. What happens when the relationship dissolves through death or divorce? Who gets the stuff? Who gets the kids? Who pays child support?

That's a great point. That is the problem with the system we are currently entwined in. The bad part is the state enters into it as a third party and play God.

 

[timosman]

That's a great point. That is the problem with the system we are currently entwined in. The bad part is the state enters into it as a third party and play God.

Shut up slave. This is good for you!

 

[osan]

Marriage is a man and a woe-man.

Because fuck you.

Have a nice day.

 

[wizardwatson]

I personally think, if a couple wants to get married should do so, I don't want the government to intervene.

"Couples" have been fornicating since the beginning. It's not always couples, sometimes it's 3 or more. Sometimes it's brothers and sisters, or fathers and daughters, or ...you get the point.

Some of these couples love each other deeply. So much they'd die for one another.

But marriage has always been one man, and one woman. Even in biblical polygamy the first wife was primary, and even in polygamy gender was part of the definition.

As much as we try to sidestep the issue by saying, "government should be out of it", the fact is, requiring a "marriage license" is an intrusion that pales in comparison the the federal intrusion via Obergefell vs. Hodges that dictates to every American that the definition of marriage is not gender based. Not only is it a killing blow to the idea of state's rights, it's a killing blow to the foundation of common law.

 

[timosman]

"As much as we try to sidestep the issue by saying, "government should be out of it", the fact is, requiring a "marriage license" is an intrusion that pales in comparison the the federal intrusion via Obergefell vs. Hodges that dictates to every American that the definition of marriage is not gender based. Not only is it a killing blow to the idea of state's rights, it's a killing blow to the foundation of common law.

They want you to follow the trolls. Kinda like this forum.

 

[juleswin]

I think govt should be involved in marriages. We needs someone to regulate the union between people that way we can help eradicate familial diseases that can be transmitted when two carrier people get together.

You might wanna take your primitive anti govt form of marriage back to Lebanon.

Btw, what do you think about trolling? I personally think the govt and RPF admin should stay away but citizens and especially RPF posters should not feed the trolls. They should let em starve cos the more you feed them, the more aggressive and trollish they get.

 

[Danke]

Marriage is a man and a woe-man.

Because fuck you.

Have a nice day.

So you would not recognize marriage for LGBTQHB people?

 

[RJB]

I thought the only reason men got married is because they knocked their girlfriend up.

 

[oyarde]

Seems like not long ago I read some study that said married people and people with animals live slightly longer . I was not able to make up my mind if the govt wanted that so they would get ya for more taxes or they wanted ya to die sooner so they did not have to repay any benefits they took money for and already spent . Maybe this is how cops got shoot to kill orders for animals and old people .

 

[osan]

So you would not recognize marriage for LGBTQHB people?

Well, maybe for the L because womyn licking each other is so hot.

As for the rest, DIE DIE DIE!

 

[RJB]

Well, maybe for the L because womyn licking each other is so hot.

As for the rest, DIE DIE DIE!

This could be taken as a direct threat against some members of the forum. There are a few in the G group. At least two in the T group. Probably a lot in the Q group and one prominent member in the HB group.

 

[CCTelander]

Marriage is an institution. And anyone who enters into it should be institutionalized!

 

[Lamp]

womyn licking each other is so hot.

Not in real life it isn't.

 

[RJB]

Not in real life it isn't.