Your thoughts on "ISIS" in Juarez, MX and calls of violence coming..

[Anti Federalist]

Your thoughts on "ISIS" in Juarez, MX and calls of violence coming..

 

[Anti Federalist]

It is entirely possible that Mercs in the hire of US government agencies (under the banner of ISIS) could cause some trouble.
Thereby keeping the MIC profits flowing, and put an end to all this civil rights talk going around these days.

Yup, that would shut down all that "freedom" nonsense overnight.

 

[Dianne]

Meh, I don't know....Logistically, I don't see how they'd get very far past the southern border states, or even very far into them, without running into serious resistance..

Have you not been reading that the Feds have been busing and flying (with no ID's) them to locations, without even telling State Governors they dumped 2000 in their state? They are scattered through the U.S. right now... they are everywhere !!

 

[fr33]

1. The initial gambit to bomb Syria didn't work ( some months ago ).

Months ago the Feds were telling us that we must help militants in attacking Assad. Today they are saying we might need to help Assad against ISIS. That's a full 360. To my skeptical mind, it sounds like the MIC, that tends to run foreign policy in the US, is just looking for reasons to get rid of munitions so they can be replenished and make some money.

 

[CPUd]

It doesn't seem like setting up shop on the US/Mexico border is what IS is all about. Not if we're talking about these guys:



They need all their fighters just to maintain the territory they have now. They do have lots of kids though; when they turn 16, they can go fight. That is their plan for growth. If they are going to attack another country besides Iraq, Syria, it would probably be Turkey.

Their rhetoric calls out just about everyone outside the Caliphate, but a lot of this is being done to fire up the crowd.

 

[ChristianAnarchist]

ISIS = BILLSHEIT!!!! There's no way any group of "terrirists" from overseas can make any kind of impact here. Even if a couple of them get here and try to kill some people as long as we have firearms they will be cut down before they can do much damage. Does that mean no one will get killed? No, I'm sure some will die but we must put everything into perspective. 10's of thousands die each year from car accidents. More from fires and drowning. Do we eliminate all liberty so that people will not die from those things? I say that for the most part these clowns are (CIA trained) poor farm boys empowered with guns and very limited in their reach. Coming here takes money and resources and I don't think they have enough to cause much damage...

 

[kcchiefs6465]

We need to militarize the borders. It's better to use our military for actual national defense than use them to police the world.

They've already militarized them.

Perhaps you've missed the American citizens traveling through a checkpoint to go to and from work and the Constitution free zones allowing the searching of, including but not limited to, American anuses, and seizing of, including but not limited to their vehicles and time?

You are calling for a further militarization, though, correct? Something akin to the harbor of Boston or say, the Baghdad 'Vatican'?

I am certain nothing could ever go wrong with the implementation of such a concept. Or is it that you are aware that indeed, (inevitably and quite predictably), something is wrong and would go wrong with such a concept but that you believe that cracking some eggs to fry up up one nationalistic omelet is necessary to ensure freedom? Because if indeed that is what you are offering, and it's pretty clear what you are offering (no matter how shorted-sighted and naive you appear to be), I'd offer you the point that those proposing big government increases in other areas offer the same sorts of 'solutions' founded upon the same sorts of 'principles' as you do (it's almost as if human fears could be studied and played upon using propagandized tactics). And when in 20 years your 'solutions' are utter disasters against freedom, perhaps your children will seek to repeal them. But in the mean time, all is well. One more brick in the wall. Quite literally, at that.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Have you not been reading that the Feds have been busing and flying (with no ID's) them to locations, without even telling State Governors they dumped 2000 in their state? They are scattered through the U.S. right now... they are everywhere !!

Who.... Muslims?

 

[orenbus]

Your thoughts on .... .. Juarez, MX ... .... ... ..... ...

 

[extortion17]

...Logistically, I don't see how they'd get very far past the southern border states, or even very far into them, without running into serious resistance..

ISIL already have passed well past the southern states fyi anyway, whether you know it yet or not . . .

. . . postings show militants from ISIL, also known as ISIS, are attempting to exploit the porous US-Mexico border
and seeking ways to covertly cross it, warns a Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) bulletin

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/08/30/377095/isil-plans-to-attack-us-from-southwest/


.

 

[Captain Shays]

My thoughts? If they are here kill every one of them. I also want to kill them everywhere they exist.

 

[presence]

If ISIS manages to make a major attack in the US I bet you Israel and Saudi Arabia will be in on it and the FBI and NSA release 28 redacted pages to explain what really happened.

 

[Ender]

My thoughts? BS.

Same propaganda shite that was used to pass PA I & II.

If there was really a threat the borders would be closed and military deployed there.

 

[qh4dotcom]

It's extremely plausible that IS could walk across the border and commit acts of terror in retaliation for being bombed.

Give anyone who wants to work here a green card, make them pay taxes and give them no entitlements until citizenship.

I can live with militarizing the border. Better to use our military to guard ours than the one between Syria and Iraq.

IS isn't going to invade the US, anyone that believes that is looney tunes. But they are well financed, disciplined and ruthless, they could kill a lot of people here.

What are the chances that ISIS will come to the city where you live?

 

[pcosmar]

What are the chances that ISIS will come to the city where you live?

None.

I don't live in or near a city.

 

[Brett85]

They've already militarized them.

Perhaps you've missed the American citizens traveling through a checkpoint to go to and from work and the Constitution free zones allowing the searching of, including but not limited to, American anuses, and seizing of, including but not limited to their vehicles and time?

You are calling for a further militarization, though, correct? Something akin to the harbor of Boston or say, the Baghdad 'Vatican'?

I am certain nothing could ever go wrong with the implementation of such a concept. Or is it that you are aware that indeed, (inevitably and quite predictably), something is wrong and would go wrong with such a concept but that you believe that cracking some eggs to fry up up one nationalistic omelet is necessary to ensure freedom? Because if indeed that is what you are offering, and it's pretty clear what you are offering (no matter how shorted-sighted and naive you appear to be), I'd offer you the point that those proposing big government increases in other areas offer the same sorts of 'solutions' founded upon the same sorts of 'principles' as you do (it's almost as if human fears could be studied and played upon using propagandized tactics). And when in 20 years your 'solutions' are utter disasters against fry reedom, perhaps your children will seek to repeal them. But in the mean time, all is well. One more brick in the wall. Quite literally, at that.

I'm not in favor of check points 100 miles from the border. I'm just in favor of putting our military right on the border, to keep people from coming here illegally.

 

[dannno]

We need to militarize the borders. It's better to use our military for actual national defense than use them to police the world.

Ya, we need a military to defend us from the CIA, great idea

 

[DP714]

They'd get mowed down in a second. I doubt even Boobus would wait for jackboots to arrive before shooting back at those punks. I doubt even he would believe any such rag tags could make it that close to the mainland without significant help from someone somewhere near D.C., just waiting for the news of "the attack" to be broadcasted before quickly getting Part 2 of the Patriot Act passed...But then again, crazier shit has been widely accepted without question before so who knows..

 

[69360]

What are the chances that ISIS will come to the city where you live?

Define city. By most definitions the nearest one is over 100 miles from here. By choice too.

So just about zero.

 

[69360]

They'd get mowed down in a second. I doubt even Boobus would wait for jackboots to arrive before shooting back at those punks. I doubt even he would believe any such rag tags could make it that close to the mainland without significant help from someone somewhere near D.C., just waiting for the news of "the attack" to be broadcasted before quickly getting Part 2 of the Patriot Act passed...But then again, crazier shit has been widely accepted without question before so who knows..

Nobody thinks IS is going to invade the US with conventional ground forces. They would walk across the border or fly in with western passport and commit a terrorist attack.