You gotta' see this. /salute

Civil disobedience and interruption of government drivel with truth at ALL levels is to be commended and encouraged. Did this make it 'live' on CSPAN? I certainly hope so.
 
I COMPLETELY disagree with this...

There is a time and place for civil dis obedience but we win people to our side NOT by this at this time... If you want to be heard you (at this point) have freedom of speech. Create your own platform... Don't interupt and just be obnoxious... That puts people off... and does more harm than good
 
Last edited:
I COMPLETELY disagree with this...

There is a time and place for civil dis obedience but we win people to our side NOT by this at this time... If you want to be heard you (at this point) have freedom of speech. Create your own platform... Don't interupt and just be obnoxious... That puts people off... and does more harm than good

I do not believe anything is wrong with this. Why? Publicly calling out someone who is lying with a straight face to the public. That's how they distort public perception. The truth needs to be exposed, which is the entire idea of why we exist as a movement. There's nothing greater in this struggle, than transparency, and revealing the truth to all who are willing to listen. Those who are willing to listen, will realize that you're not so free, when a police officer carries you out with his arm laying over your throat for expressing your 1st amendment rights.
 
I COMPLETELY dis agree with this...

There is a time and place for civil dis obedience but we win people to our side NOT by this at this time... If you want to be heard you (at this point) have freedom of speech. Create your own platform... Don't interupt and just be obnoxious... That puts people off... and does more harm than good

If they can't plainly see it now, more than likely they never will. I applaud her courage and non-violent intervention during what I saw as a lambasting of propaganda to the public. Plant the seeds of doubt of those in power and harvest the crops of liberty years from now.

This generation shall pass and what is left standing are those who are willing to turn off the T.V. and say "No Thank You"
 
I do not believe anything is wrong with this. Why? Publicly calling out someone who is lying with a straight face to the public. That's how they distort public perception. The truth needs to be exposed, which is the entire idea of why we exist as a movement. There's nothing greater in this struggle, than transparency, and revealing the truth to all who are willing to listen. Those who are willing to listen, will realize that you're not so free, when a police officer carries you out with his arm laying over your throat for expressing your 1st amendment rights.

Hmmm are you an anarchist? "the entire idea of why we exist as a movement" ? I've been involved since 2007... It is not the entire reason I am here... so please.... stop trying to speak for me..

Thanks..
 
If they can't plainly see it now, more than likely they never will. I applaud her courage and non-violent intervention during what I saw as a lambasting of propaganda to the public. Plant the seeds of doubt of those in power and harvest the crops of liberty years from now.

This generation shall pass and what is left standing are those who are willing to turn off the T.V. and say "No Thank You"

That is one way to look at it... It also may turn people off for good instead of patiently reasoning with them.... Do you see Dr Paul doing this? I think not.. He waits his turn to speak on the house floor... Hell why don't he just go on the floor and filibuster til they drag him out... It is because there is a better way...
 
Hmmm are you an anarchist? "the entire idea of why we exist as a movement" ? I've been involved since 2007... It is not the entire reason I am here... so please.... stop trying to speak for me..

Thanks..

If you're not here to present the truth, what are you here for? Would you consider a message of freedom, peace, morality, to not be worthy of being considered truth? I do not believe that "protest" or "civil disobedience" is a sign of Anarchy. Nor do I like the "labeling" tactic, when anarchy itself has multiple definitions depending on the culture from which it's commonly known in.

But, I digress, you are being overly sensitive.
 
Last edited:
It turns me off to hear them put out this narrative that I've been hearing on Fox and CNN that al Qaeda was worried about its 'image' with Muslims. What a crock and obviously some psyop that the government guy at the microphone was dutifully propagating.
 
If you're not here to present the truth, what are you here for? Would you consider a message of freedom, peace, morality, to not be worthy of being considered truth? I do not believe that "protest" or "civil disobedience" is a sign of Anarchy. Nor do I like the "labeling" tactic, when anarchy itself has multiple definitions depending on the culture from which it's commonly known in.

But, I digress, you are being overly sensitive.

So you believe it is fine to disrupt someone else's meeting to put forth your "truth"... So when someone disagrees with your "truth" can they come in and disrupt your meet-up group and not yield to you? Is that ok too?
 
Back
Top