You gotta' see this. /salute

[Barrex]

First thing that came on my mind was: Is there a chart on how many innocent people terrorists killed and how many innocent people US government killed.
Something like this:

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ....................................................................... -
US government.............................................. terrorists

*I am from Croatia.

 

[speciallyblend]

First thing that came on my mind was: Is there a chart on how many innocent people terrorists killed and how many innocent people US government killed.
Something like this:



*I am from Croatia.

hmm i am not seeing anything in your chart looks blank to me??

 

[Carson]

She was great!

 

[Carson]

hmm i am not seeing anything in your chart looks blank to me??

I'm seeing it. The innocents side looks way short by my estimation.

But maybe we should stand back and redefine terrorist. ?



Here is the link to just one of the countries we've illegally invaded with these monstrosities. Check out how almost all of the victims were called "Militant" in the charts. What'd they do shake a tiny fist at the sky?

http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones

 

[deadfish]

Wow.

How do you save youtube videos? I have a hunch this one won't be around for long.

 

[Carson]

nothing wrong with socialists at the local level if folks approve co-ops, community farms etc as long as it is not by gov force. I have no problem with local socialists as long as they are not using gov force and it is on issues a majority of local voters agree on. (

co-op workplaces, food-shares, community gardens, charitable donations and anything else they organize) is a good thing and voluntary). ​

This revolution reminds me of the way people gathered together in the sixties. Lots of people with lots of views but we all just got along. I think we are going to work through our differences this time also.

The spread eagle was a classic move for anyone that grew up with brothers and sisters. She certainly looked like family at that moment.

Once upon a time... or maybe twice.

 

[RPtotheWH]

Its her right to freedom of speech at a public event. I love how the .gov never addresses any issue that would show they are lying, they just ignore it and carry on. If someone is using their freedom of speech to lie, then we must combat it with truth.

"Errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." - Thomas Jefferson.

 

[Noble Savage]

I believe she was in spirit...maybe a fallen soldier speaking through her

 

[talkingpointes]

Damn, she made it out till the end. That was a fantastic job.

 

[Philosophy_of_Politics]

What if in their opinion you are "spreading propaganda, and depriving the American public of an honest representation of government"? Don't they (in your world) have the right to disrupt you?

That is anarchy...

If I'm spreading lies, whether intentionally or unintentionally, I would want someone to interrupt me and/or give me a reality check.

 

[twomp]

bravo to this woman!

 

[cstarace]

This is excellent. I don't like Code Pink, but on this issue, Benjamin is right on. Kudos to her, I'm sure it's a nerve-wracking experience.

 

[Origanalist]

Well, she made her point quite well I would say. I think I need to share this with a few people.

 

[Origanalist]

nothing wrong with socialists at the local level if folks approve co-ops, community farms etc as long as it is not by gov force. I have no problem with local socialists as long as they are not using gov force and it is on issues a majority of local voters agree on. (

co-op workplaces, food-shares, community gardens, charitable donations and anything else they organize) is a good thing and voluntary). ​

+1

 

[kcchiefs6465]

I was watching this on CSPAN the other night. I am kind of disappointed I shut it off. (before this happened) I've read a few comments disagreeing with her actions.. well maybe if FOX or CNN or MSNBC or any other news station gave her 30 seconds to speak the truth (or better yet, if they just reported the truth) she wouldn't have to resort to interrupting on CSPAN. I do salute this woman.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Hmmm...

Let me see if I have this right, from at least the perspective of some folks:

1 - Booing? Nope.

2 - Interrupting? Nien.

3 - Create a ruckus? No way.

4 - Snowballs? That is right out.

5 - Any form of civil disobedience or public outrage at the lies and the murders and filth and the corruption of what passes for "our" government, that might conceivably offend even in the slightest the most sensitive of hanky wringers? Nyet.

Got it.

I'll fit right in, now.

 

[tod evans]

5 - Any form of civil disobedience or public outrage at the lies and the murders and filth and the corruption of what passes for "our" government, that might conceivably offend even in the slightest the most sensitive of hanky wringers? Nyet.

Effective civil disobedience;

 

[phill4paul]

Hmmm...

Let me see if I have this right, from at least the perspective of some folks:

1 - Booing? Nope.

2 - Interrupting? Nien.

3 - Create a ruckus? No way.

4 - Snowballs? That is right out.

5 - Any form of civil disobedience or public outrage at the lies and the murders and filth and the corruption of what passes for "our" government, that might conceivably offend even in the slightest the most sensitive of hanky wringers? Nyet.

Got it.

I'll fit right in, now.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again.

 

[cstarace]

Hmmm...

Let me see if I have this right, from at least the perspective of some folks:

1 - Booing? Nope.

2 - Interrupting? Nien.

3 - Create a ruckus? No way.

4 - Snowballs? That is right out.

5 - Any form of civil disobedience or public outrage at the lies and the murders and filth and the corruption of what passes for "our" government, that might conceivably offend even in the slightest the most sensitive of hanky wringers? Nyet.

Got it.

I'll fit right in, now.

Mmm... now that's a crowd I want to be a part of.