Will Biden be replaced?

[Invisible Man]

if they swap out biden now trump wins by large margin , libertarian wont get one percent but kennedy west etc pull 6 , so they have to keep him to win

You're saying that the Dems will do better with Biden than anybody else?

 

[oyarde]

You're saying that the Dems will do better with Biden than anybody else?

ya , they are not going to improve w/ kamala etc . Its the barak biden-obama regime- MIC ticket that is a proven dem winner , changing now will throw more votes to west , kennedy , stein. It wont even be close , trump lead in swing states will increase , election is only coming down to a few states now. So real question is do dems think they really have a chance without biden ?If so they havnt been polling

 

[Invisible Man]

ya , hey are not going to improve w/ kamala etc . Its the biden-obama regime- MIC ticket that is a proven dem winner , changing now will throw more votes to west , kennedy , stein. It wont even be close , trump lead in swing states will increase

I agree about Kamala. Likewise with any other woman, if they succumb to the pressure to put a woman at the top of the ticket. If they play to win and nominate a man, then they can only go up from Biden. I think Newsome would definitely do better than Biden, and I'm sure there are other options they have out there who would as well.

 

[CaptUSA]

ya , they are not going to improve w/ kamala etc . Its the barak biden-obama regime- MIC ticket that is a proven dem winner , changing now will throw more votes to west , kennedy , stein. It wont even be close , trump lead in swing states will increase , election is only coming down to a few states now. So real question is do dems think they really have a chance without biden ?If so they havnt been polling

Except.... Michelle Obama.

I really think the GOP is burying their heads in the sand pretending and hoping that Biden will be the nominee. I don't see it happening.

 

[69360]

This seems right to me. Regardless how determined Biden claims to be to stay in the race to the end, he will eventually cave in and quit the race voluntarily once the pressure to do that reaches a high enough level and he sees that that's his best available option.

And this is why the Dem nominee being someone other than Biden is still very realistic, while the GOP nominee being someone other than Trump is not at all realistic, unless some extreme circumstance that has not yet arisen dramatically changes things. The loyalists who keep supporting Biden could shrink to a level below what he needs to be able to carry on, so that voluntarily withdrawing becomes his only choice. That is realistic with Biden. It is not with Trump.

It'll be realistic when they replace Biden with somebody who can beat Trump. Then the panic will set in and Trump is gone as well.

 

[acptulsa]

It'll be realistic when they replace Biden with somebody who can beat Trump. Then the panic will set in and Trump is gone as well.

Whether that's true or not, you'll never convince a certain segment of the population of that. And these cultists will exhort an exorbitant influence on who gets the GOP nom.

 

[Invisible Man]

It'll be realistic when they replace Biden with somebody who can beat Trump. Then the panic will set in and Trump is gone as well.

Again. How?

Replacing either candidate requires that the candidate willingly goes along with it. It will take a lot to convince either one of them to. It will take more to convince Trump than it will Biden. And there is infinitely less of a chance of Trump's support, both from powerful party insiders and from grassroots supporters, dropping down to a level that would be needed for him to agree to that. Losing campaign funding from bankers isn't going to make Trump quit.

Also, if these backroom power brokers you're talking about already have a Democrat candidate who is on track to beat Trump, why would they still need to replace Trump on the GOP ticket? Why not just let him lose?

 

[CaptUSA]

Rob Reiner says Joe should step down
James Carville says it's inevitable
Michael Moore calls for Biden to step aside - calls it elder abuse
Stephen King...
Abigail Disney...
Ari Emanuel...

And it's not going to get better. The flood gates are open. And every public appearance by Biden will add more and more donors. In spite of their protestations, the left doesn't give 2 shits about "democracy" - they want power. And they will easily ditch any semblance of a "democratic" selection if it means a better shot at power.

I'm sticking with Michele Obama. But it could really be a cheese sandwich at this point - all they need to do is have some short term excitement ginned up by the press and fake polls and the intel agencies will take care of the rest.

 

[Snowball]

It'll be realistic when they replace Biden with somebody who can beat Trump. Then the panic will set in and Trump is gone as well.

Whomever the replacement is, will grow to outstretch Trump in the polls, and then win, no problem.

This is what they are really choosing, not whether Biden is out or not, which is already decided.

 

[CaptUSA]

Lots of interesting takes in here, but I think Vivek nails my thoughts @21:41

 

[Mordan]

ya i dont believe dollar economy can be saved by anyone. I believe past of Reid , Pelosi and scumer pretty well killed it

indeed. Nobody can save the dollar now. Its just about kicking the can down the road until it explodes. Maybe the elites will find a new solution or a solution will be found naturally by the economic forces in the world. (my preferred scenario with Bitcoin)

 

[69360]

Again. How?

Replacing either candidate requires that the candidate willingly goes along with it. It will take a lot to convince either one of them to. It will take more to convince Trump than it will Biden. And there is infinitely less of a chance of Trump's support, both from powerful party insiders and from grassroots supporters, dropping down to a level that would be needed for him to agree to that. Losing campaign funding from bankers isn't going to make Trump quit.

Also, if these backroom power brokers you're talking about already have a Democrat candidate who is on track to beat Trump, why would they still need to replace Trump on the GOP ticket? Why not just let him lose?

How did they block Ron at the convention? They change the rules and move the goalposts.

Donations are funding Trump's legal defenses. Take that away and he would quit in a minute.

 

[Invisible Man]

How did they block Ron at the convention? They change the rules and move the goalposts.

Donations are funding Trump's legal defenses. Take that away and he would quit in a minute.

That was easy. Ron wasn't on a path to win, and he didn't even really want to speak at the convention anyway. Opponents of Ron controlled the rules committee. Meanwhile, supporters of Trump control the rules committee now. Trump has plenty of donations from his minions. And he will continue to.

 

[69360]

That was easy. Ron wasn't on a path to win, and he didn't even really want to speak at the convention anyway. Opponents of Ron controlled the rules committee. Meanwhile, supporters of Trump control the rules committee now. Trump has plenty of donations from his minions. And he will continue to.

Wait and see. I think if one is replaced both will be.

 

[Anti Globalist]

It doesn't matter whether or not Biden is replaced. Either way the Democrats pretty much have this election locked down. Keep Biden as the nominee, and steal the election in a way more blatant than it was in 2020. Replace Biden with a different candidate, and you won't need to cheat to win since 3 months isn't enough time for Trump to close the gap. If Biden's replacement ends up shitting the bed, just cheat them into office and claim Trump's legal issues are the reason he lost.

Face it, people need to just accept the fact that Trump has no pathway forward.

 

[Anti Federalist]

I agree about Kamala. Likewise with any other woman, if they succumb to the pressure to put a woman at the top of the ticket. If they play to win and nominate a man, then they can only go up from Biden. I think Newsome would definitely do better than Biden, and I'm sure there are other options they have out there who would as well.

I think [MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION] had the only viable solution for the Marxists.

Drop Biden like plutonium and embrace JFK Jr. with no exceptions, no holds barred.

Let him run like a wildman with a flamethrower in a powder magazine, on vaccines, the war machine, debt, Israel, corporatocracy, the whole shitting mess of it.

But they will not, because they are hopelessly corrupt. And I would add traitorous.

 

[jmdrake]

I think [MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION] had the only viable solution for the Marxists.

Drop Biden like plutonium and embrace JFK Jr. with no exceptions, no holds barred.

Let him run like a wildman with a flamethrower in a powder magazine, on vaccines, the war machine, debt, Israel, corporatocracy, the whole $#@!ting mess of it.

But they will not, because they are hopelessly corrupt. And I would add traitorous.

Yeah. That and option #2 which some on the left have finally said outloud.

 

[Occam's Banana]

The Democrats "Are Running" Kamala Harris | Part Of The Problem 1140
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMr2siuT_6M
{Dave Smith | 09 July 2024}

On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave takes a look at the media talking about getting Joe Biden out and Kamala in.

 

[Snowball]

A Clinton-Harris ticket is currently being floated in Dem circles.

 

[Occam's Banana]

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #293:

Biden Cannot Be Forced Out of Race Democratically by Oligarchs
https://rumble.com/v56716l-biden-cannot-be-forced-out-of-race-democratically-by-oligarchs.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 09 July 2024}

​