Why Donald Trump Is Leading the Pack

[cindy25]

Churchill and Hitler both got elected because the population was sick of "Girly-men" as Arnold puts it.

The Crisis will bring forth strong leaders. Either Rand glues his balls back on or he will be by-passed.

His dad's message was ballsy but the man was to polite in its delivery.

Neither of them, despite being fucking doctors, ever addressed the medical racket and monopolistic extortion in any meaningful way.

Churchill was not really elected as he took over for Neville Chamberlan mid-term. he even lost the 1945 election. and Hitler was also not elected. he lost to Hindenberg. then after Hindenberg died he became chancellor because the other parties gave it to him.

but that said, Rand has to be much more aggressive. otherwise the GOP will nominate Walker, Trump will run 3rd party and socialist Hillary will sail in. and she is far to the left of Obama, with much more authoritarian tendencies.

 

[acptulsa]

Neither of them, despite being fucking doctors, ever addressed the medical racket and monopolistic extortion in any meaningful way.

Ron Paul went to town on it on The View, before an audience of tens of millions, got a standing ovation and made Whoopi Goldberg make little liberal squeaking noises and actually chide and upbraid her own studio audience for applauding something that wasn't liberal or progressive, but actually made sense and is known to have worked.

Just because you never saw the mainstream media replay clips of it, and find all the youtube recordings of it have been pulled down because the network exercised copyright privileges, does not mean you get to use the word 'never' in front of the word 'happened'.

I'm here to help people get the truth, not to reinforce the media's assertion that what they don't point their cameras at never happened.

 

[HankRicther12]

Funny how when black, hispanic, Asian, Arab, Indian, etc leaders say people of their race should work towards their interests no one has an issue with it, but heaven forbid whites realize the danger of becoming a minority and being surrounded by people who hate them and blame them for every problem in their life. Yes, I want to prevent that, I'm so horrible.

Trump is popular because he's telling it like it is and isn't backing down. That is refreshing for many on the right who have seen the Left have victory after victory while the Right's representatives act like freaking pansies.

Of course, he may not believe any of it, and he has a horrible record, so he isn't getting my support in the primary, and I think those of you who choose to support him are making a serious mistake, but I'm glad he is driving the establishment nuts. It makes for great theater.

I'm not going to give him any money or anything, but if he's on the ballot, I circle the square, why not, what have we got to lose, who's going to do any better?

Anybody who claims to hold the principles of Ron Paul and likes Trump, is either a liar or brainwashed.

Sure, and if Trump says it's harmful to drink battery acid you're going to say "bottom's up" because it's Trump so anything he says must be wrong. Me, I'll go ahead and be brainwashed and skip the drink.

 

[AuH20]

Nice fake tweet. Who cares about white people? It's about culture. If minorities were reprogrammed with the right culture, they wouldn't be so goddamn gullible and nearsighted. And that goes for a majority of the white people living near the population centers. They forgot the lessons of life and swallowed the lies. That's why this technocracy is growing. Ignorance and a detachment from the hard lessons of the past.

 

[AuH20]

The future is rural vs. urban. It isn't black vs. white or whatever minority battle of the day. That's what transpired in the Soviet Union. The independent individuals detached from the tentacles of the state controlled urban centers were the ones that gave Stalin fits.

 

[David Sadler]

(a fake Donald Trump tweet)

The tweet attributed to Trump in the above post is fake. Search on twitter for it and there will be no returns for Donald Trump. What will come up for Trump is this tweet.

The fake tweet which attempts to make Trump appear racist, which he is not, uses a phrase sourced from a David Lane.

David Lane is most famous for a statement called the 14 Words. They are: "We Must Secure The Existence Of Our PEOPLE And A Future For White Children."
-- Source here.

There will be an ongoing attempt to make Donald Trump appear to be racist just as there was a successful propaganda campaign to make Ron Paul appear racist. This is expected and all we can do is attempt to inform and educate to counter the propaganda.

 

[erowe1]

If only...

Why is this bozo still here?

 

[HankRicther12]

Why is this bozo still here?

Why do you want a forum full of people who only agree with you? I notice you never refute anyone's points.

 

[erowe1]

Why do you want a forum full of people who only agree with you? I notice you never refute anyone's points.

You notice wrong. I bother to refute the posts that deserve it. You've never written one of those, and if you've ever read one, you probably didn't comprehend it.

I don't want a forum with people who only agree with me. I just want a forum where people don't feel free to propagate blatant racism.

 

[HankRicther12]

You notice wrong. I bother to refute the posts that deserve it. You've never written one of those, and if you've ever read one, you probably didn't comprehend it.

I don't want a forum with people who only agree with me. I just want a forum where people don't feel free to propagate blatant racism.

Oh brother, you're really going to go with that lame ole excuse. Oh yes, you are just so above us all that we are not worth replying to, yet you do anyhow, but strangely you never say anything.

"Racist" my goodness, does that word even have any meaning anymore? Yeah, sure, I'm racist, I'm also sexist, isolationist, anti-semitic, homophobic, statist, collectivist, nativist, I hate the poor, I hate America, I hate the sick, the elderly, the troops, I sympathize with terrorists....and, oh yeah, I kick little puppies every chance I get. Any other run of the mill nonsense you want to sling?

 

[erowe1]

Oh brother, you're really going to go with that lame ole excuse. Oh yes, you are just so above us all that we are not worth replying to, yet you do anyhow, but strangely you never say anything.

"Racist" my goodness, does that word even have any meaning anymore? Yeah, sure, I'm racist, I'm also sexist, isolationist, anti-semitic, homophobic, statist, collectivist, nativist, I hate the poor, I hate America, I hate the sick, the elderly, the troops, I sympathize with terrorists....and, oh yeah, I kick little puppies every chance I get. Any other run of the mill nonsense you want to sling?

When you type something substantive that is worth answering, let me know.

Yeah, the post I labelled as racist was racist. That's not debatable. If you have any questions about that, see the site guidelines.

 

[juleswin]

Oh brother, you're really going to go with that lame ole excuse. Oh yes, you are just so above us all that we are not worth replying to, yet you do anyhow, but strangely you never say anything.

"Racist" my goodness, does that word even have any meaning anymore? Yeah, sure, I'm racist, I'm also sexist, isolationist, anti-semitic, homophobic, statist, collectivist, nativist, I hate the poor, I hate America, I hate the sick, the elderly, the troops, I sympathize with terrorists....and, oh yeah, I kick little puppies every chance I get. Any other run of the mill nonsense you want to sling?

Just because a word is overused in the general population doesn't mean that it seizes to have any meaning anymore. I mean, I can count on one hand how many times racist has been used a derogatory term on this website against a forum member. Heck SJW is used for more often than say racist, or sexist or anti-Semite etc etc combined on this forum

The other thread about Trump, some stormfronter member called a supposedly fake Trump tweet racist and nobody batted an eye lid on that one. So yea, something are indeed racist. You can't use that word when it favors Trump and then deny it having any meaning when it is used against a Trump supporter.

 

[HankRicther12]

When you type something substantive that is worth answering, let me know.

Yeah, the post I labelled as racist was racist. That's not debatable. If you have any questions about that, see the site guidelines.

"of substance" oh sure, in other words stuff that you agree with. Which post are you referring to BTW? Pretty bold to say something is "not debatable". You call everything racist from what I see.

Just because a word is overused in the general population doesn't mean that it seizes to have any meaning anymore. I mean, I can count on one hand how many times racist has been used a derogatory term on this website against a forum member. Heck SJW is used for more often than say racist, or sexist or anti-Semite etc etc combined on this forum

The other thread about Trump, some stormfronter member called a supposedly fake Trump tweet racist and nobody batted an eye lid on that one. So yea, something are indeed racist. You can't use that word when it favors Trump and then deny it having any meaning when it is used against a Trump supporter.

If it's used when there actually is something racist that would true, however this individual I was speaking to has called me racist on several occasions when I've never said anything racist at all, and it seems that just like the "progressives" few of you even know what that word means. Likewise, who is this "Stormfronter" member and how do you know they have anything to do with Stormfront?

 

[acptulsa]

"of substance" oh sure, in other words stuff that you agree with. Which post are you referring to BTW? Pretty bold to say something is "not debatable". You call everything racist from what I see.




If it's used when there actually is something racist that would true, however this individual I was speaking to has called me racist on several occasions when I've never said anything racist at all, and it seems that just like the "progressives" few of you even know what that word means. Likewise, who is this "Stormfronter" member and how do you know they have anything to do with Stormfront?

First, what difference does it make if a stormfront defender has a membership card or not?

Secondly, what does your attempt to defend the indefensible have to do with Donald Trump?

Third, if you have nothing to say about Trump, why are you posting in this thread?

 

[HankRicther12]

First, what difference does it make if a stormfront defender has a membership card or not?

Secondly, what does your attempt to defend the indefensible have to do with Donald Trump?

Third, if you have nothing to say about Trump, why are you posting in this thread?

What do you mean what does it matter? You're saying it's OK to falsely accuse someone of something? Who is defending Stormfront?

What "indefensible" thing did I defend?

I was responding to a post so WTF are you talking about?

 

[acptulsa]

I was responding to a post so WTF are you talking about?

I was talking about how funny it is that Fox spent ten years or so blathering about who is and isn't electable, but hasn't used the word once since it started promoting Trump twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Very curious.

And on topic.

 

[AuH20]

Utter domination. Look at that red line. And it could grow larger after he takes John Ellis and Scott Walker to task. Though I have a strong suspicion that the smug blowhard Christie is going to be the chief attack dog for Bush Co.

 

[acptulsa]

Utter domination. Look at that red line. And it could grow larger after he takes John Ellis and Scott Walker to task. Though I have a strong suspicion that the smug blowhard Christie is going to be the chief attack dog for Bush Co.

Utter domination. You betcha. Just like Palin. And Santorum. And Bachmann. And Huckabee. And Cain. And a thousand others. And the only one the media said couldn't possibly win was Reagan.

This chess match is going to go to the player who actually has an end game. Trump will be lucky if his end game doesn't involve his head being mounted on a post.

 

[AuH20]

Utter domination. You betcha. Just like Palin. And Santorum. And Bachmann. And Huckabee. And Cain. And a thousand others. And the only one the media said couldn't possibly win was Reagan.

This chess match is going to go to the player who actually has an end game. Trump will be lucky if his end game doesn't involve his head being mounted on a post.

Donald can.......

(a) weather controversies, thanks to his no frills rhetoric
(b) gleefully buck the establishment because he sure as hell ain't your typical Republican
(c) self-finance his campaign and then some

Why even bring up the rest of those C list politicians? This is a whole new paradigm at work.

 

[timosman]

This chess match is going to go to the player who actually has an end game.

It is definitely not going to go to a player who does no have any game at all.

Trump will be lucky if his end game doesn't involve his head being mounted on a post.

Just WTF are you talking about ? You should wait till the drug wears off before posting.