Why do we care about Russia invading Georgia?

It's autonomous just like how Russia has many autonomous republics with the Federation.

Ossetia has been a part of Georgia for centuries. Read about it.

But I really don't care, because in their last election they had a 90%+ voter turnout and 95%+ of the voters want NOTHING TO DO WITH GEORGIA.

Georgia does not get to have South Ossetia just because they have had it for centuries. They have their own government and the citizens want nothing to do with Georgia. Georgia is tyrannical, so I definetely support the decisions of the citizens.

You still are missing the point. Georgia bombed innocent Russian civilians and South Ossetian civilians, and many Russian peace officers were killed. Russia had a reason for invading Georgia, while you and the rest of the MSM are ignoring it for some reason.
 
Setting aside the fact that Russia is anti liberty, South Ossetia is part of Georgia. Georgia's actions are similar to a civil war. They are both wrong.

No they aren't South Ossetia has it's own government.

Do I have to post "South Ossetia has it's own government" 20 times on a thread for people to understand?
 
It's not "Russia invading Georgia"...

Why does the MSM have to dictate the terminology we use?!?

The correct phrase should be "NATO-backed Georgia invading South Ossetia"!
 
But I really don't care, because in their last election they had a 90%+ voter turnout and 95%+ of the voters want NOTHING TO DO WITH GEORGIA.

Georgia does not get to have South Ossetia just because they have had it for centuries. They have their own government and the citizens want nothing to do with Georgia. Georgia is tyrannical, so I definetely support the decisions of the citizens.

You still are missing the point. Georgia bombed innocent Russian civilians and South Ossetian civilians, and many Russian peace officers were killed. Russia had a reason for invading Georgia, while you and the rest of the MSM are ignoring it for some reason.

CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

I can't speak for the MSM but I'm not missing any point. Georgia may have attacked Russian "peacekeepers" but what were they doing in South Ossetia in the first place. Georgia has every right to kick them out.

By your arguments we have every right to have invaded Serbia and Iraq. Do you agree?
 
But that is still Georgia's business. Russia justifying an invasion on those grounds isn't much different from the US's justification for invading Iraq, one of which was that Saddam was guilty of genocide so therefore we must overthrow him.

Plus Russia has no moral high ground on the matter. Chechnya anyone?

Bologna.

South Ossetia is mostly Russian citizens. The Russian army was protecting them and the South Ossetians.

This is nothing like Iraq. Besides, when Hussein was committing genocide against his citizens, we knew about it and we still gave him money and weapons. Then we invade him over a decade later for the same actions. That is just stupid.
 
That is what wars are for. Determining sovereignty and borders. If there wasn't a border dispute and sovereignty issues, there would be no war.
 
It's not "Russia invading Georgia"...

Why does the MSM have to dictate the terminology we use?!?

The correct phrase should be "NATO-backed Georgia invading South Ossetia"!

Seriously. They still don't get it. Why the fuck do these people think that Georgia has the right to bomb innocent civilians and Russians in a break-away region without any repercussions?? Why do they think that Russia would just sit by while their citizens are being slaughtered? Where am I? Is this a Ron Paul supporters forum?
 
Last edited:
Bologna.

South Ossetia is mostly Russian citizens. The Russian army was protecting them and the South Ossetians.

This is nothing like Iraq. Besides, when Hussein was committing genocide against his citizens, we knew about it and we still gave him money and weapons. Then we invade him over a decade later for the same actions. That is just stupid.

That's false. South Ossetia is only 2/3 Ossetian and 1/3 Georgian. Why should the 2/3 who claim Russian citizenship (which is also bogus intervention on the part of Russia) decide the fate of the region?

And regardless of how long we waited to attack Iraq, the fact of the matter is we used genocide as a pretext. Russia is doing the same thing. How is that different? How is it ok for Russiasn to agitate South Ossetians against Georgia?
 
Seriously. They still don't get it. Why the fuck do these people think that Georgia has the right to bomb innocent civilians and Russians in a break-away region?? Why do they think that Russia would just sit by while their citizens are being slaughtered? Where am I? Is this a Ron Paul supporters forum?

Yes, and it would make sense for Ron Paul supporters to sympathize with the struggles of Georgians to maintain their sovereignty against Russian aggression.
 
:rolleyes:



So you think NATO should decide the fate of the region??


I hope you read that article hypnogogue posted above.

No... I think Georgians and South Ossetians need to figure that all out.

It's none of either Russia or US's business.

Yes I read the article but I'm skeptical of it.
 
Last edited:
Russia is full of communists and collectivists. Russia is retarded.
Your a Bush ball licker, What would you call Bush&Co, McCain&co or Obama&co?????

Regardless of what you think about The Russian government they are not at fault here and have every right to kick Georgian ass for the war crimes committed against the breakaway province of South Ossetia by the puppet president with the puppet master! Do some homework or shut up...
 
Your a Bush ball licker, What would you call Bush&Co, McCain&co or Obama&co?????

Regardless of what you think about The Russian government they are not at fault here and have every right to kick Georgian ass for the war crimes committed against the breakaway province of South Ossetia by the puppet president with the puppet master! Do some homework or shut up...

Could you pro-Russia people please stop being so hysterical. Bush ball licker? Pulleeze.
 
Yes, and it would make sense for Ron Paul supporters to sympathize with the struggles of Georgians to maintain their sovereignty against Russian aggression.
Well, the proper liberty understanding is that the individuals are sovereign, and not Georgia itself. Georgia as a nation receives it's sovereignty from the consent of it's sovereign inhabitants. The South Ossetians have, apparently, overwhelmingly withdrawn that sovereignty from Georgia.

I fully believe in the right of a people to withdraw themselves and their lands from any nation. The South Ossetians would be completely justified, in my opinion, to fight the Georgian attempt to subsume their land and persons back into the Georgian state.

Russia's position is an interventionary one in some respects, but it is an intervention that is strongly supported by the sovereign individuals involved. South Ossetian resistance is fully justified and they have accepted Russia as the military champion of their cause.
 
Your a Bush ball licker, What would you call Bush&Co, McCain&co or Obama&co?????

Regardless of what you think about The Russian government they are not at fault here and have every right to kick Georgian ass for the war crimes committed against the breakaway province of South Ossetia by the puppet president with the puppet master! Do some homework or shut up...

I would call them collectivist scum. I will never side with a collectivist regardless of country of origin. Your insulting manner is sophomoric. It is clear to me that there are disputes going on...its called war. Whoever wins will decide the fate of the others.
 
Back
Top