"Why didn't we hear more about Ron Paul?"

I think a group of you in Monroeville should go pick up Jean Tokar in a limo and take her to lunch. Let her friends eat their hearts out.
 
No it isn't. There is no age limit. I'd take a 100 year old Ron Paul before I'd take a 50 year old Barack Obama.

You have Johnson 2012 and you are pushing a 77 y.o. RP :confused:

I hope RP lives long and continues the fight, HOWEVER each of you need to stop being delusional, a 77 y.o. will never be elected POTUS. A POTUS campaign ran right ages a person five to ten years.

Find someone younger to take the torch. Johnson, Goode, or whomever. The message is what matters, not a man or woman. LIBERTY forever !!!

As for the topic? Bravo, Jean Tokar ! The answer is simply. The controlled corporate media didn't allow a non-interventionist peace candidate who believes in our original Republic to be heard !
Media Caught Lying: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iW5kOB1pmg
 
Hopefully Dr. Paul's mind and body will stay in good shape as he'll be 77 in 2012.

And somehow in the intervening 3 years he will "magically" learn some executive management skills?

You know, so he can run an actual campaign, much less a presidential administration. (BTW the kinds of skills necessary for a "turnaround artist" are even MORE rare and difficult than those of a simply competent steward, and while RP's heart and philosophy are in the right place, sadly, he just doesn't have any of the skills needed.)
 
The other possible candidates are not as libertarian as Ron Paul is and don't have the records to back themselves up. They aren't as intelligent as Ron Paul is either.

No one needs executive experience to follow the Constitution. Experience only became an issue this election because there were no real differences between the candidates.
 
Back
Top