who flipped? Palin or Rand?

This is an intresting political marriage. Palin also gains from this, this will help rehabilitate her "conservative" credential for a portion of people after her having supported McCain. She is the endorser.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Palin does have something between her two ears and flipped. Women can be nasty, claws out.
 
Ummm... No where on the Huffo link page does it ask "who flipped"?

And you can refer to Sarah's press release where she says "while we disagree on some things..,"
 
Neither.

Endorsing someone doesn't mean you agree with them on every issue - it means you like them more than the other guy (similar to how many people vote).
 
Rand called her a giant.

is she just endorsing the winner? and could she really be changing? she has no love for the NYC banks, which must cause concern in Tel Aviv.
 
For those not here during the RP08 Campaign it should be mentioned that Palin come up on this forum long before McCain tapped her shoulder. There was talk at the time of it being a Paul/Palin ticket. Palin actually had to chang away from her leanings to conform to the McCain ticket.
 
cindy25 said:
Rand called her a giant.
Click to expand...
What do you want him to call her? She just endorsed him. Regardless of what any of us think of her, she is held in high esteem by a lot of disgruntled Republicans. You know, the kind who would like Rand Paul.

is she just endorsing the winner? and could she really be changing? she has no love for the NYC banks, which must cause concern in Tel Aviv.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter at this point.

This is about Rand and his campaign.
 
I don't mind him calling her a giant, and the endorsement is a positive. But is it strange bedfellows, or is there a chance Palin (and/or Steve Forbes) could become real (Taft/Goldwater) Republicans?

I have mixed feelings about Palin. I can't decide who is the real Palin.
 
cindy25 said:
I don't mind him calling her a giant, and the endorsement is a positive. But is it strange bedfellows, or is there a chance Palin (and/or Steve Forbes) could become real (Taft/Goldwater) Republicans?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't hold my breath, if I were you.
 
An endorsement like this tells people who support Palin and agree with Rand on on 80-90% of issues that it is okay to vote for Rand. It's a good thing, and gets Rand their support without having to compromise on the 10-20% of issues they don't fully agree on.
 
but that 10-20% is what separates Rand from the establishment candidate. most Republicans want lower taxes, are against Obamacare etc.

but finding the antiwar , anti-patriot act Republican is the challenge.

is the Tea party movement libertarian or neo-con?
 
cindy25 said:
but that 10-20% is what separates Rand from the establishment candidate. most Republicans want lower taxes, are against Obamacare etc.

but finding the antiwar , anti-patriot act Republican is the challenge.

is the Tea party movement libertarian or neo-con?
Click to expand...

Who cares, so long as they vote for the libertarian? Which this endorsement encourages them to do. This isn't about finding purely libertarian candidates, it's about wooing not purely libertarian voters to the candidate we already have.
 
I'm sorry, but that was the last endorsement he needed at the moment...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
Tucker - Former Pentagon official Dan Caldwell explains what would happen if Ted Cruz gets his way in Iran.
Replies
1
Views
85
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
The Real National Emergency: Endless Wars, Failing Infrastructure, and a Dying Republic
Replies
5
Views
149
acptulsa
acptulsa
Swordsmyth
RFK Jr. Plans to Slash At LEAST 10,000 Jobs at HHS
Replies
1
Views
61
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
From Project 2025 to the PayPal Presidency: School Choice Fin-Tech for a Blockchain Social Credit Economy
Replies
1
Views
105
PAF
PAF
PAF
Marco Rubio’s Free Speech Hypocrisy
Replies
4
Views
92
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Back
Top