White House Wants Crypto Rules as a Matter of National Security

Occam's Banana

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
39,964
White House Wants Crypto Rules as a Matter of National Security
https://www.barrons.com/articles/wh...egulate-cryptos-national-security-51643312454
Daren Fonda (27 January 2022)

The Biden administration is preparing to release an executive action that will task federal agencies with regulating digital assets such as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a matter of national security, a person familiar with the White House’s plan tells Barron’s.

The national security memorandum, expected to come in the next few weeks, would task parts of the government with analyzing digital assets and assembling a regulatory framework that covers cryptos, stablecoins, and NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, this person said.

“This is designed to look holistically at digital assets and develop a set of policies that give coherency to what the government is trying to do in this space,” the person said.

The State Department, Treasury Department, National Economic Council, and Council of Economic Advisers would be involved in the initiative.

The White House National Security Council would also be involved, the person said, since crypto has economic implications for national security. Along those lines, the administration would instruct agencies to work on harmonizing regulations of digital assets between countries.

“Because digital assets don’t stay in one country, it’s necessary to work with other countries on synchronization,” the person said.

The White House wouldn’t issue recommendations. Agencies would be given three to six months to come up with proposals, and the White House would act as a policy coordinator.

White House officials declined to comment.

Bloomberg earlier this month reported on the White House’s plan.

The White House aims to bring order to the haphazard approach that the government is now using to regulate crypto, the person said. Various agencies oversee the industry, including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. But there’s no consensus on matters such as whether some tokens should be registered as securities, or how to oversee exchanges, stablecoins, and high-yield lending products.

Congress has held multiple hearings on cryptos in recent months, exposing partisan divides between Republicans and Democrats on how to regulate the industry.

The Biden administration is also urging Congress to draft rules. The White House released a report on stablecoins in November, recommending that Congress act promptly to regulate the industry.

The Federal Reserve has also weighed in on digital currencies. The Fed released a report on a central-bank digital currency, or CBDC, earlier in January that laid out the pros and cons of digitizing the dollar. The report said that the Fed could start work on the project with support from the White House and Congress. A Treasury Department spokesman called the report an important step forward in discussions about a CBDC.

Other countries are ramping up scrutiny of crypto, seeing it as a matter of national economic security. Russia’s central bank and finance ministry said this week that Bitcoin mining and trading activity should be more tightly regulated. Russian President Vladimir Putin called on regulators to form a unanimous opinion on regulating the space Wednesday.
 
m0cj3qo.jpg
 
Wasn't a selling point of crypto is that governments couldn't interfere due to encryption?
 
Wasn't a selling point of crypto is that governments couldn't interfere due to encryption?
Pretty much the US govt has no way to technically stop crypto.

But all they need to do is create a law, make a huge example of the first person who violates it, and then it will have a chilling effect on people who use crypto so that it's pushed underground or largely stomped out of the mainstream.

The government cannot enforce a law on everyone, they just have to shape people's behavior so that they tend to comply with the law.
 
Pretty much the US govt has no way to technically stop crypto.

But all they need to do is create a law, make a huge example of the first person who violates it, and then it will have a chilling effect on people who use crypto so that it's pushed underground or largely stomped out of the mainstream.

The government cannot enforce a law on everyone, they just have to shape people's behavior so that they tend to comply with the law.

I hope the US govt does try to stop crypto.

Crypto I think has largely forgotten why it was created.

It was created, in order to be able to conduct transactions without government approval.

Instead, almost every crypto startup these days is bending over backwards to figure out how to comply with state laws & regs.

It needs to go back to its beginnings. Back to its purpose:

Disobedience
 
Biden s planning on taking your bitcoin since he doesnt think you'll turn your gold and guns in
 
It is long past the time to separate. Hopefully this will be the spark where people will finally say they have had enough.
 
It is long past the time to separate. Hopefully this will be the spark where people will finally say they have had enough.

Yep. Many in the crypto community are younger folks who are "mildly skeptical" of some of the more outrageous and blatant overreaches of government power but still largely believe in the System. This would be just the wakeup call needed to flip them to full-on opposition to tyranny...
 
Instead, almost every crypto startup these days is bending over backwards to figure out how to comply with state laws & regs.
Because no one wants to be the nail that sticks above all of the other nails... it gets the hammer.

See Ross Ulbricht, Cody Wilson, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange
 
Because no one wants to be the nail that sticks above all of the other nails... it gets the hammer.

See Ross Ulbricht, Cody Wilson, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange

Crypto will need to find a way to tackle that problem before it can grow it into its designed purpose.

An anonymous person cannot be prosecuted. Its within the capabilities of the technology.
 
A couple honest questions from a guy who has never owned any crypto.

The article says:
While bitcoin and other coins aren’t yet considered securities, the regulators will dig into finding out if there are instances of money laundering, pump-and-dump schemes, shady business practices, wash sales and market manipulations. This would be a complete game changer if Biden’s administration goes full throttle on this matter.

Why would finding out if there are instances of money laundering, pump-and-dump schemes, shady business practices, wash sales, and market manipulations, be a game changer?

From the article, the answer to that question might be this sentence:
If the regulators find irregularities, substantial fines and tax levies may be extracted from everyone involved in the crypto ecosystem.

But that sounds crazy. Does that sentence really mean exactly what it says? Or is that hyperbole? How can they fine people who had nothing to do with any fraudulent activity just because they also happen to own crypto?
 
Bullshit. Real reason is that Biden's cronies probably all just shorted BTC and will make huge profits.
 
Crypto will need to find a way to tackle that problem before it can grow it into its designed purpose.

An anonymous person cannot be prosecuted. Its within the capabilities of the technology.

Bitcoin is not anonymous (out of the box). But it is anonymity-compatible. That means, it's up to you to make your Bitcoins anonymous. Yes, you can do it if you educate yourself how. By its very nature, there will never be a "click-button solution" to the problem of wealth anonymity. If you go around bragging about how many Bitcoins you have stashed in your "cold wallet", it won't be long before you get "de-anonymized" by some hoodlums holding a 9mm to your head. Bitcoin cannot solve this problem because no technology can. It's a behavioral problem.

If you (generic) have some Bitcoins that you would not like traced back to your identity, you can send them through a coin-mixer (I've never tried this, so I am not recommending it), or do a cross-chain transfer to a privacy-oriented coin such as Monero or Zcash and back, into an offline cold-wallet (breaking provable chain of custody). Will that protect you from a national-security-scale adversary? Probably not, but you shouldn't have to worry about that, even with ol' Sleepy Joe in the Oval Office. These tools are really expensive, so they are targeted to actual high-value targets. Try not to be a high-value target. Just using Bitcoin doesn't make you a high-value target, no matter how crypto-cool you feel with your neck-chain hardware-wallet loaded up with $735 worth of Bitcoin... :tears:
 
Bitcoin is not anonymous (out of the box). But it is anonymity-compatible. That means, it's up to you to make your Bitcoins anonymous. Yes, you can do it if you educate yourself how. By its very nature, there will never be a "click-button solution" to the problem of wealth anonymity. If you go around bragging about how many Bitcoins you have stashed in your "cold wallet", it won't be long before you get "de-anonymized" by some hoodlums holding a 9mm to your head. Bitcoin cannot solve this problem because no technology can. It's a behavioral problem.

If you (generic) have some Bitcoins that you would not like traced back to your identity, you can send them through a coin-mixer (I've never tried this, so I am not recommending it), or do a cross-chain transfer to a privacy-oriented coin such as Monero or Zcash and back, into an offline cold-wallet (breaking provable chain of custody). Will that protect you from a national-security-scale adversary? Probably not, but you shouldn't have to worry about that, even with ol' Sleepy Joe in the Oval Office. These tools are really expensive, so they are targeted to actual high-value targets. Try not to be a high-value target. Just using Bitcoin doesn't make you a high-value target, no matter how crypto-cool you feel with your neck-chain hardware-wallet loaded up with $735 worth of Bitcoin... :tears:

Bitcoin anonymity is nowhere near sufficient.

Monero anonymity is better from a technical standpoint but it still is far from sufficient in practice.

And yes there will never be a perfect "click button" solution for anonymity there is a huge gaping gap bigger than Cardi B's veejay, between the anonymity that is possible and the anonymity that exists today.

Full anonymity requires an ecosystem built around it. Everything from the acquisition of crypto to the spending of crypto.

So yes, monero allows you to transfer 0's and 1's anonymously.

But it doesn't allow you to live and work anonymously.

Not yet
 
I envision entire corporations & enterprises running anonymously on these crypto systems.

It's entirely possible, practical, and feasible. It just requires the will to subvert the existing status quo.
 
Back
Top