when is the vote to repeal JohnsonCare (Medicare/medicaid)

cindy25

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
6,817
the house voted to repeal Obamacare

but why is there never a vote to repeal JohnsonCare? it is also mandatory.
 
the house voted to repeal Obamacare

but why is there never a vote to repeal JohnsonCare? it is also mandatory.

And clearly UnConstitutional . Not in Article One , Section Eight , putting it back to the states.
 
First you have to open up health insurance across state lines like auto , home , life insurance .
 
Actually , if this had been allowed to be dealt with by states , someone would have come up with a voluntary type plan that would have worked and could have been used as a model for other states who wished too and some states may have decided to do little .
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.

You have it .
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.

You actually have the formula that covers cutting entitlements . This is why it is so important none are ever passed again.
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.

The next step should be a repeal of Medicare part D. That would put both parties in a predicament, the dems who voted against it in 2004, and the Republicans who voted to repeal Obamacare.
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.

That's why we need a second voting age...
 
a bill to make JohnsonCare and the FDRPonziplan VOLUNTARY would not be suicide today; this is not 1964.

the retort could be "if its so good why are people forced to join"

maybe there could be an interim requirement to have a retirement account equal to the Ponziplan tax
 
Even Ron wouldn't vote to repeal Medicare. He just wants to phase it out for younger workers.
 
a bill to make JohnsonCare and the FDRPonziplan VOLUNTARY would not be suicide today; this is not 1964.

the retort could be "if its so good why are people forced to join"

maybe there could be an interim requirement to have a retirement account equal to the Ponziplan tax

The voluntary thing has merit .
 
At 22 % of the budget it has to go away long term or it destroys the country . That percentage will only go up .

Or at least put a $2,000 deductible on it like Rand wants to do. That would make the cost of Medicare go way down. I'd love to repeal Medicare, but it's never going to happen.
 
it'd be political suicide--I'd guess well over 85% of the elderly would oppose it, and the vast vast majority of those who were 50 and over would likely oppose it as well, leaving you with only support from those younger than that...and, even then, you'll have those on the left and right who don't actively have a problem with it (indifferent)...so...to make that a platform...tragically, wouldn't work.

What if we add some Sandman provisions?

logan.jpg
 
First you have to open up health insurance across state lines like auto , home , life insurance .

healthcare reform will never exist until you get rid of insurance companies. Insurance companies are why we have high healthcare costs. The fact is insurance companies are the problem! We have 500,000 in debt to prove it!!! The botton line is the insurance industry will profit of you before they ever think about covering you! they are in business to take your money not to help you when times are tough. yes they will cover small costs etc but once you have something serious happen to you. the point of an insurance compnay is not to help you but to profit of you at all cost even your own health. health reform will never hapopen since the problem is the insurance companies. all those folks paying insurance will never find out until they actually have a serious problem happen!!

where did insurance companies leave us? with approval letters for my wifes surgery and then after surgery denials across the board and left with 500,000 in medical bills and lost everything and cannot fight them. I call bs on both sides on this issue!! the whole idea of healthcare reform is just a false flag for the corrupt gop and dnc to f over americans!! now we are left with crappy gov health care and crappy private healthcare! the bottom line is the insurance companies are the major problem both sides have their heads so far up the insurance lobby's azz so they can f us!!
 
Last edited:
Justin Amash
just voted yes on Amendment No. 1 to H Res 9, which resolves that Congress "enact a permanent fix to the flawed Medicare sustainable growth rate formula used to determine physician payments under title XVIII of the Social Security Act." This has been a persistent problem for health care providers and patients. It passed 428-1.
 
Back
Top