What would Rand Say about Feds Making School Accomodate TransGender or No Funds?

Careful, you are letting your bias show. AFAIK there is nothing precluding a boy who identifies as a girl from still being physically heterosexual. They could just be a lesbian trapped in a male body. In which case; it might not be flaccid.

Oh yes, the typical - "lesbian trapped in a man's body with a boner in the girl's bathroom" - the most oppressed group of them all!
 
Well I guess that it's good to know that the tranny moron who grabbed my balls and stole my phone is probably going to get himself assaulted by some other sodomite weirdo some time...

Exactly what type of establishments have you been visiting down there? Nvm, don't answer that.
 
Careful, you are letting your bias show. AFAIK there is nothing precluding a boy who identifies as a girl from still being physically heterosexual. They could just be a lesbian trapped in a male body. In which case; it might not be flaccid.

How is that any different than a homosexual in their own sex's locker room?
 
Lol at Americans.

Uni-sex showers at universities elsewhere in the world must just blow your fucking minds. *People can be naked together in a shower and not need to fuck each other?*

The whole country is so fucking repressed.
 
I'm pretty sure that the dudes who beat on other dudes that pretend to be women are mostly a bunch of closet sodomites, and not "cis" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to be)...

Why must you bring your thoughtless conjecture into this thread? You're "pretty sure" that they're all closet homosexuals? How do people get away with such baseless, stupid comments? Why is that acceptable all of a sudden?
 
I'm pretty sure that the dudes who beat on other dudes that pretend to be women are mostly a bunch of closet sodomites, and not "cis" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to be)...

Why must you bring your thoughtless conjecture into this thread? You're "pretty sure" that they're all closet homosexuals? How do people get away with such baseless, stupid comments? Why is that acceptable all of a sudden?
 
I'm pretty sure that the dudes who beat on other dudes that pretend to be women are mostly a bunch of closet sodomites, and not "cis" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to be)...

Why must you bring your thoughtless conjecture into this thread? You're "pretty sure" that they're all closet homosexuals? How do people get away with such baseless, stupid comments? Why is that acceptable all of a sudden?
 
I'm pretty sure that the dudes who beat on other dudes that pretend to be women are mostly a bunch of closet sodomites, and not "cis" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to be)...

Why must you bring your thoughtless conjecture into this thread? You're "pretty sure" that they're all closet homosexuals? How do people get away with such baseless, stupid comments? Why is that acceptable all of a sudden?
 
Why must you bring your thoughtless conjecture into this thread? You're "pretty sure" that they're all closet homosexuals? How do people get away with such baseless, stupid comments? Why is that acceptable all of a sudden?

Closet "homosexuals" are the most rage-filled people on this planet. It's common that they rent some hooker's asshole and then promptly beat the shit out of the owner of said orifice. How do you not know this shit? This is degenerate sodomite 101.
 
Closet "homosexuals" are the most rage-filled people on this planet. It's common that they rent some hooker's asshole and then promptly beat the shit out of the owner of said orifice. How do you not know this shit? This is degenerate sodomite 101.

How is this common knowledge? That would be a better question. When the fuck did everyone just start assuming that everyone who hates or even remotely opposes alternative sexual lifestyle communities must necessarily be a closeted member of said community? Why does everyone "know" this now?

Because what it really seems like is a bunch of liberals got together and decided to play psychiatrist and everyone just followed along. Nobody even questions it despite the fact that there's absolutely no basis for it.
 
Last edited:
These kinds of issues are a trap. He should try his best to deflect it.

Previously in debates, foreign policy or abortion was discussed until the moderator turned to Ron Paul and asked him about gay marriage. It's a convenient question for media talking heads that can be used to completely waste a candidate's time. The country is in a shambles, our foreign policy is a mess, but we're going to waste your time talking about these relatively mundane social issues. Hey let's talk about Caitlyn Jenner instead of how we are drone bombing hospitals.

I wouldn't think this would be a minor issue to a parent that has a teenage girl. I don't think that most parents would be too happy about their teenage daughter showering with boys. If Rand were smart he would focus on these issues and increase his popularity with social conservatives. But unfortunately so far he's taken your advice, and the result is that he's at 2% in the polls. He refuses to take a strong stand on these issues and stand with social conservatives on the issues where there should be full agreement between libertarians and social conservatives.
 
So you guys want this man to be forced to use woman's bathrooms and make everyone uncomfortable just because he has a vagina?

IJustNeedToPee-x400.jpg
 
So you guys want this man to be forced to use woman's bathrooms and make everyone uncomfortable just because he has a vagina?

IJustNeedToPee-x400.jpg

This was an article about a person with male body parts who sued to be able to shower with girls. He was already allowed to use the women's restroom. In a woman's restroom you use a stall where no one can see what you're doing. That's quite a bit different from allowing someone with male body parts to shower with teenage girls. And they already gave this kid his own locker room to shower. He wasn't forced to shower with boys. But that still wasn't good enough for him.
 
Last edited:
This was an article about a person with male body parts who sued to be able to shower with girls. He was already allowed to use the women's restroom. In a woman's restroom you use a stall where no one can see what you're doing. That's quite a bit different from allowing someone with male body parts to shower with teenage girls.

I don't know how universal this is (I'm guessing it's fairly universal because girls in HS tend to value privacy... it's an awkward time), but in my high school's locker room, each shower had its own curtain and each toilet had its own stall. I had gym for four years, including an aquatics unit, and never once saw anyone strip down or even inadvertently expose an area that is usually covered.

It is certainly not anything resembling a communal shower, as you seem to be implying. I have no idea how something like this would be enforceable, anyway. I'm envisioning something like "vagina checks" (or penis checks in the case of trans men): whenever any female walks into a public bathroom (without loss of generality), she'll have to loudly announce to everyone, "I have a vagina! I am allowed to be in this bathroom because I have a vagina!" And if anyone questions her, well, I guess she'll just have to flash the bureaucrat in question. "Look, I really do have a vagina. You are safe now." Now, as awkward as it was to type out how enforcement of these bathroom laws would have to go, the actual enforcement would be unbearably awkward for everyone involved. But that is the kind of mentality these bills promote. "If you would like to be in the bathroom with these young girls/boys, first you're going to have to expose yourself to them." Yay, I feel safer already.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top