There have been some people who basically said that the police should've simply put out a "wanted poster" and relied on private citizens to capture the suspect. They basically just want a country of anarchy where each individual defends themselves and the government shouldn't even defend life, liberty, and property.
I've asked before, and you failed to respond. Please provide quotes of these people that have posted that "police should've simply put out a "wanted poster"" and what not. You keep claiming "people" are posting that cops should have done "nothing" and other such words, but never back it up. I've read all these threads and have never seen it. However, you have a long (as in, years) history of conveniently rewording the opinions/assertions of others and completely misrepresenting them.
You've certainly done it at least half a dozen times in this very thread, as has been pointed out by several posters.
They could have simply broadcast their pictures, and told people to be on the lookout for them but not to approach as they usually do. I cannot in my lifetime remember a whole city being shut down before.
I believe I said that this attack was the 1st attack on our soil since 9-11.
It was an extraoridinary situation because it was only the 2nd terrorist attack on our soil in our country's history. It's not something that happens every day.
They could have simply broadcast their pictures, and told people to be on the lookout for them but not to approach as they usually do. I cannot in my lifetime remember a whole city being shut down before.
Unless you think we started a new country on 9/11, which honestly, wouldn't surprise me.
I know you love to reword the statements of everyone else, but at least get your own shit straight.
Unless you think we started a new country on 9/11, which honestly, wouldn't surprise me.
Well then you are wrong there again.Go back about 3 pages or so and read the posts. I said that I made a misstatement and it wasn't want I meant to say. I meant to say that this was the first terrorist attack since 9-11.
It's not the exact same wording, but similar.
And I repeat, QUOTE it. if you're going to keep claiming people say stuff 'like that', provide some quotes. Because I have not seen it, and i'm up to date on all these stupid threads. Even the fringiest of the fringe aren't posting that cops should have done absolutely nothing. Some may disagree with law enforcement in general, but that is not even remotely the same thing and would be conflating a post about theory with a post on what should have been done.
They could have simply broadcast their pictures, and told people to be on the lookout for them but not to approach as they usually do. I cannot in my lifetime remember a whole city being shut down before.
The funny thing is the Constitution provides for too much government for many of our liking, but we are the ones defending it from Democrats and Republicans alike that pick and choose which parts they want to obey and which ones they don't. If you want troops to be allowed to invade homes at their will, amend the fucking Constitution. Until then, spare me what judges say about it.
If you want to have no warrantless searches under any circumstances, then amend the Constitution and strike out the words "unreasonable searches" and replace it with the words "no searches."
Warrantless is the same word a unreasonable. Why don't you understand that?
But I also recognize that the Supreme Court has ruled that the police have the authority to search homes without a warrant in extraordinary situations where there's an imminent threat to public safety.
There just isn't a single federal judge who sees it that way. Look, I'm generally against warrantless searches. I'm opposed to the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, warrantless drone use, etc. But I also recognize that the Supreme Court has ruled that the police have the authority to search homes without a warrant in extraordinary situations where there's an imminent threat to public safety.
Which is all the time, every day, 24/7.
The Homeland is the battlefield everyday in a War on Terror that is open-ended and never, ever going to end.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Which is all the time, every day, 24/7.
The Homeland is the battlefield everyday in a War on Terror that is open-ended and never, ever going to end.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Is there any situation under any circumstances when a member of the government can enter a home without a warrant? What about a fire and firefighters who enter the home to put the fire out? What if the owner is on vacation and isn't able to give the firefighters permission to enter his home?