To point I was trying to make to Contumacious is that just because something is morally wrong does not mean it should be legal.
cool. Yeah, my comment was directed at our liberal friend from Puerto Rico.
To point I was trying to make to Contumacious is that just because something is morally wrong does not mean it should be legal.
This will be my last post on this subject. I am a female, so my opinion reigns supreme on this matter, along with other femals on this board.
This will be my last post on this subject. I am a female, so my opinion reigns supreme on this matter, along with other femals on this board.
I do not want some coked out Congressman, or Senator dictating what I do with my life ..... I know these drugged up senators and congressmen and presidents, and attorney generals make great money for their "look in other direction" movements...
But no one in this entire hell hole place, we once called America... can ever tell me what to do with my body ...
You can never right to life me, until you are ready, willing, and able to throw your arms into anti drones... where obama kills thousands of kids every day.
Don't preach to me about right to life... until you're ready to throw down your life to protect the kids Obama kills on a daily bais...
A baby is no less of a baby because you are a female.And as the last postcript ... I suffer from PTSD, and my worst fear in life is that I will get pregnant ... Sooooooooooooooooo ... I abstain from sex completely ... I will never bring another child into this world, suffering from the same mental illness I have... but what if ?????
I'm actually sickened, this forum judges... when we are libertarians ... Judge, jury, executioners ...
I'm only asking that you who Judge... be prepared to judge yourself ... When you are a female, you can weigh in or abortion... if you are a male... get the f out of the discussion.
Abortion is not a decision weighed lightly ..... by most females.
This will be my last post on this subject. I am a female, so my opinion reigns supreme on this matter, along with other femals on this board.
Our new undisputed champion for...featherweight class?Hey, sorry there Dianne, I'm female and probably older than you so... I win!
Uhh, a little more than featherweightOur new undisputed champion for...featherweight class?![]()
...
I'm actually sickened, this forum judges... when we are libertarians ... Judge, jury, executioners ...
I'm actually sickened, this forum judges... when we are libertarians ... Judge, jury, executioners ...
That would be anarchists, not libertarians. Anarchists are opposed to laws, state, government, etc., even if there is a victim. Basically, libertarian are not opposed to having laws, state, government, etc. if there are victims.This forum has some libertarians, far from all; and the libertarians here, by and large, are not the ones in support of outlawing abortion, even if many of them consider having an abortion to be immoral.
Wait a second! How did I miss that? Executioners? How ironic!
This forum has some libertarians, far from all; and the libertarians here, by and large, are not the ones in support of outlawing abortion, even if many of them consider having an abortion to be immoral.
.. Anarchists are opposed to laws,
...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anarchy?s=tNonsense. Do some reading.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anarchy?s=t
Anarchy, definition # 1: a state of society without government or law.
There, I did some reading. What are you talking about "nonsense"?
LOL! Even though I cited the ultimate authority on definitions on words, da dictionary (online version)? Ok, fine; whatever you say. My point is about libertarians not being opposed to laws for protecting victims.No government = anarchy
No law = anomie
Get it? Got it? Good.
Who will enforce the law then?No government = anarchy
No law = anomie
Get it? Got it? Good.
Wait a second! How did I miss that? Executioners? How ironic!