dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
So much for his asking people to listen to the speakers even if they didn't agree with them
Practice what Tucker preaches, not what he does.
ROFL, good point... that was him that said that..
So much for his asking people to listen to the speakers even if they didn't agree with them
Practice what Tucker preaches, not what he does.
Same thought crossed my mind.Maybe Tucker is looking after his livelyhood at MSNBC, and doesn't want the stigma of being associated with the Truther movement at this point in his current employment which might be hanging by a string (his show was cancelled earlier this year).
F Tucker, what a baby! He can't handle asking a couple of questions about 9/11? Is he afraid the truth might actually come out? Man, let's get over Tucker Carlson, who the F cares if he leaves the movement entirely.
I can hardly blame Tuckerson if he did. I got pissed off when Ventura brought it up.
I don't care if you believe in 9/11 truth. You have the right to.
9/11 Truth is political and organizational suicide, you don't publicly endorse it.
The Ron Paul movement does not need this negative publicity tied to it.
Did you see the 'forum' on C-Span before the Rally?
Tucker was on stage, sitting next to the Huffington Post lady (Plastic Snob), she stated that any 911 conspiracy mentioned in the blogs on her site will not be tolerated. Tucker tried to get a word in, but never did.
I thought Ventura's 9/11 tidbit was inappropriate, although some of the content-- such as asking questions-- was. The others in this thread are right when they say it's political suicide.
Hasn't Ron Pauls ENTIRE CAREER been "political suicide"??? When has he ever put political expedience first?
Hasn't Ron Pauls ENTIRE CAREER been "political suicide"??? When has he ever put political expedience first?
Again, the rally was a truther rally, not one about limited to government and freedom
Did you watch like three minutes of the rally where someone dared to ask a few questions about 911, or WHAT? That wasn't anything close to a truther rally.
it certainly wasn't a unified chant, it was garbled and distant.
First class metaphor.
Originally Posted by inibo
First class metaphor.
It sounded pretty clear and defined to me. Like I said, there are those of you here who are more interested in pursuing crackpot conspiracy theories instead of returning your government to normalcy.
Fact of the matter is you won't get an investigation until you have a real man of the people in the White house. Jesse Ventura isn't. He moved to Mexico and dictates from his vacation house and you don't even bother to research his stances or record.
I think you misread my intent. When I referred to "garbled and distant" as a metaphor for Truth I was comparing it to the overall Liberty movement. I'm not passing judgment, just saying what I think the priority should be.
As to Jesse Ventura, I have looked into him since his speech at the rally. It's already been posted several times, but just in case, everyone should check this site at minimum: http://www.ontheissues.org/Jesse_Ventura.htm
At this point I'm giving him a C+, maybe a B-. He needs to do a bit more homework. There is a lot to like about him as a person and he is an excellent rabble rowser, but he's not going to just walk in and take over, nor is he going to be able to sit back and wait for us to come to him begging. Democratic and Republican big-wigs might be able to get away with that and Democratic and Republican voters might fall for it, but we are different. We've worked with a master and our support has to be earned. I consider his appearance at the Rally as an audition. I say he's earned a second reading, but I'm not ready to offer him the part yet.
Gary John and Bruce Fein are a little bit higher on my short list. Are either of them actually considering a run for anything?