What happened to Tucker Carlson? Did he get pissed off? and not come back?

[PlzPeopleWakeUp]

nt

 

[muh_roads]

Yeah he didn't dwell on 9-11. He only brought up facts we know so far. That the FBI has Osama listed for other attacks, but not 9/11. And when the FBI was asked why Osama isn't listed, they said "not enough evidence to link him to it".

That is fact and that is really all he mentioned. He didn't go into "bombs", or falling at the speed of gravity, or Pentagon hole too small, or hollow core, or anything.

It really wasn't much at all concerning 9-11 truth. Any truthers that were there hoping he'd talk all about it I'm sure were very disappointed.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Yeah, but apparently that didn't stop some from unleashing the "9/11 is an inside job" chant.

 

[muh_roads]

Yeah, but apparently that didn't stop some from unleashing the "9/11 is an inside job" chant.

I think that means they want more...

I really didn't hear much about that chant, it certainly wasn't a unified chant, it was garbled and distant...at least from where I was sitting.

 

[fj45lvr]

Yeah, but apparently that didn't stop some from unleashing the "9/11 is an inside job" chant.

nauseating.....

I don't get it....there is already plenty of REAL things IN PLAIN SIGHT to fight about without rallying around mere allegations that these people have NO IDEA about.

 

[mport1]

More people turned off by 9/11 "truth", great...

 

[V4Vendetta]

According to Politico, Tucker left after Jesse Ventura's 911 comments:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0908/Too_Much_for_Tucker.html

That's exactly what I was thinking, either it was that or the mix up about books. But I was leaning more towards Jesse and 9/11. I remember what he said about people who believed the government was behind 9/11. Made me want to wrap my hands around his neck, and squeeze.

Oh well, Screw Tucker Carleson. He and his Child will suffer for his ignorance.

 

[Drknows]

To be honest, I did a slight facepalm in front of my screen when Ventura brought up 911. I'm on the fence regarding the issue and have no problems with it being investigated further, but you gotta pick your battles and I just don't think it was the right time or place to bring that stuff up. But to each his own, I guess. I wouldn't have left because of it, but it wouldn't exactly make me cheer beacuse it just wasn't a good tactic to bring up 911 in that way at the rally IMHO.

I agree with everything you said.

His speech was amazing but that one part of it i said Oh no here we go again.

 

[Orgoonian]

Freedom,and liberty really is a new concept to a lot of people,and it is unreasonable to assume they will jump all the way in right away.I believe a lot of people need to gradually adjust.

Take the reformation for example.A great man(to me)Martin Luther challenged the church of Rome,and splintered into his own church.Now he only took a baby step againsed(sp?) the mother church doctrine,but it was a step,and that was as far as he was willing to go.Because of him,other great men,took bigger,and bigger steps towards religious freedom,and thus the birth of the reformation.

Tucker has usually been in our corner,and maybe,he has gone as far as he can for the time being.
Maybe we should practice what we preach,and live,and let live.If people want to believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy,or not,then so what?Frankly,i find some of their arguments fascinating,and i am grateful for their support of Dr.Paul.

 

[BLuegreengrey]

I enjoyed the diversity of speakers.

 

[ronpaulitician]

Ventura stated facts, right?

And they're the kind of facts that we should want our government to explain, whether we believe that government is incompetent or malicious.

 

[gls]

Poor Tucker couldn't handle a couple of legitimate questions. What a baby. I hope he wasn't paid in full for his brief appearance but he probably was.

 

[ruggedindividualist]

I wondered what happened to Tucker. The guy is an ass and unprofessional to boot. If that's all the deeper his free speech beliefs go then good riddance. He's a Trojan horse anyway. He was probably planning to leave in a huff to try to discredit something someone said all along and get himself a little publicity. I can't believe the organizers trusted him to emcee anyway. We should be glad he didn't decide to bring his hooker and pimp pals for photo-ops with Dr. Paul. Nothing against hookers so much (I guess in Tuckers case they are kindred souls...but there I go again, insulting hookers, sorry!) but he was trying to embarrass Dr Paul and the campaign with that stunt and gain favor with the Powers that Be.

 

[Truth Warrior]

Particularly appalling and curious after Tucker's opening "rock em, sock em" address. Now, I'm really kinda wondering who really wrote Tucker's speech. Geez, if he's really that thin skinned, he wouldn't last even 5 minutes on the RPF.

Something is not adding up here, folks.<IMHO>

 

[FrankRep]

I'm still angry at Tucker for bringing those hookers to talk to Ron Paul.

Remember that?

Tucker is a dork.

 

[LibertyEagle]

I wondered what happened to Tucker. The guy is an ass and unprofessional to boot. If that's all the deeper his free speech beliefs go then good riddance.

A lot of people are going to close their ears to us on some's belief that our government carried out 9-11. That's just reality. It's not like no one has mentioned this before, right? So, it shouldn't come as a shock. The interesting thing about it, is that Ron Paul doesn't believe this view either. So if we're supporting C4L, it shouldn't be an issue.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I never saw him again after he introduced Adam, i think it was.
He must have gotten chewed out for mixing up the authors of "Who killed the Constitution" Thomas Woods with the other guy.

(Edit)
Well It turns out that he left after Jesse Ventura brought up 9/11. Which Is really what I was thinking.

Thanks kern802
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0908/Too_Much_for_Tucker.html

I remember what he said about people who believed the government was behind 9/11. Made me want to wrap my hands around his neck, and squeeze.

Oh well, Screw Tucker Carleson. He and his Child will suffer for his ignorance.

maybe he didn't want to put his career on the line?

 

[Truth Warrior]

I'm still angry at Tucker for bringing those hookers to talk to Ron Paul.

Remember that?

Tucker is a dork.

Yeah, that one pissed me off too. Curious emcee choice after that unhelpful episode.<IMHO> Hmm?

 

[Truth Warrior]

A lot of people are going to close their ears to us on some's belief that our government carried out 9-11. That's just reality. It's not like no one has mentioned this before, right? So, it shouldn't come as a shock. The interesting thing about it, is that Ron Paul doesn't believe this view either. So if we're supporting C4L, it shouldn't be an issue.

Then WHY even invite Jesse to speak at the rally? His views on 9/11 are widely known.

 

[ruggedindividualist]

A lot of people are going to close their ears to us on some's belief that our government carried out 9-11. That's just reality. It's not like no one has mentioned this before, right? So, it shouldn't come as a shock. The interesting thing about it, is that Ron Paul doesn't believe this view either. So if we're supporting C4L, it shouldn't be an issue.

No. it shouldn't be an issue. Ventura did good. He made some valid points and left it at that. 9-11 does need investigation and the more people say it outright the harder it will be to marginalize anyone. Most folks polled DO agree it merits more investigation, it is the MSM and the establishment who tries to marginalize anyone who dares speak that and paint them as crazies....and that was Venturas point. Ron Paul is trying to work for freedom within the establishment, there are some things he can do and some things he cannot.