What do you think of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

What? You only like your version of the truth? He has had some experience that can help all of us understand this mess.

Its not that he has a different perspective. It is that he attacks you like a raving mad dog and accuses you either explicitly or implicitly of being a racist who hates Muslims anytime you say anything he doesn't like about someone who happens to be either Muslim or Middle Easterner. To put it in a word, he is a jerk.
 
Apparently you haven't been here long enough to learn that whenever someone says something they don't like some around here immediately label them part of the "global conspiracy." Its an irrational faith requiring no proof.

Its not that he has a different perspective. It is that he attacks you like a raving mad dog and accuses you either explicitly or implicitly of being a racist who hates Muslims anytime you say anything he doesn't like about someone who happens to be either Muslim or Middle Easterner. To put it in a word, he is a jerk.

And you rage on consistently about global conspiracy accusations...At least his anger/frustration comes from loss of human life.
 
.................Yes, and Nikita Khrushchev said, "We will bury you," and, "Your grandchildren will live under communism." ................

Turns out he was right. The grandkids of the generation which was miitary age in 1962 are in fact living under a regime which is communist Amerikan Style.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I don't want an attack on Iran............BUT also I want to see the moslems gone from America.
 
The crucial difference is that no one here is advocating the murder of Muslims, whereas you are advocating the murder of Christians in the name of religion.

I never have advocated murder. I only advocate what is according to Islam. People who convert out of Islam and become any other religion, are not considered to be a part of that religion, only apostates. So therefore there are not 'Christians' according to Sharia, just apostates.

There are laws against treason. They commit treason in an Islamic state, they face the consequences, just like in any other state.

In your mind:

Committing Treason in a country that is not yours + Trial = "Wanting to kill" or "advocating murder"

While American Christians go on killing Muslims daily in their own countries without any trial and you have nothing to say against that.

Now let's compare the two situations here.

There's some "pastor" in Iran who "converted" from Islam to Christianity in Iran, which is a crime punishable by death. The "pastor" was tried and is now awaiting execution.

Then there were infants in Iraq, who were summarily shot by foreign US troops. No trial for the infants. Can you tell me what crime these infants committed against the wonderful US government?

If you have a problem with Sharia, then you have a problem with Muslims. Lucky for you haters, America is killing Muslims on a daily basis without any trials (which you get under Sharia) so be happy about that.

None of the Iran haters has answered this:

When did the US ever hold a trial for any of the Muslim children it has killed?"


I wonder if I will ever get an answer.
 
Last edited:
his lies about Iran.

Apparently you have no qualms about the western media's lies about Iran, where they advocate for the gay pedophile baby rapist and say that the only reason he was getting executed was because that piece of shit was gay and not because he was a pedophile rapist.

I remember back in 2010 there was a guy in Iran on trial for raping a male child, but the Western "media" reported the case as the guy being on trial for being gay. These fucks did not care that a child was raped and instead spun the story to condition the people to accept the upcoming genocide of Iranians. Never let a good opportunity go to waste even if it comes at the expense of children. Of course, my point is moot to these "mainstream media" parrots who simply believe that Iranians and every other Muslim are not human and it is okay to kill 'em all.
 
Sharia sounds really awesome! /sarcasm

You have a habit of posting random 'Sharia' quotes without posting the source and who did the translation from Arabic to English. Without a valid translation your quotes can be disregarded. For me, the only legitimate sources of Sharia will originate from a Howza Ilmiyah institution. Any other source is not valid. Therefore, some random Malaysian law doesn't mean shit to me.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, and after we wipe out all those evil Muslims, we can then go after those psychotic Hindu's. And when we have eventually eliminated all the other religions, you Christians had better run. The only reason you aren't first is because who else is going to do all this killing in the name of God.
 
I've done extensive research into his quotes on Israel. Over and over he refers to the "Zionist regime" rather than israel. If you do research on israel's formation, then yes, it is in fact a zionist regime. Rather than denying the holocaust, ahmadinejad is denying the importance the holocaust in how people who question it get sent to jail and how it's used as a justification for the zionist takeover of palestine despite being half a world away. Again, he doesn't wish for israel to be wiped off the map, he wishes for the regime to cease to exist, and "The Muslims, Jews, and Christians of Palestine choose their own government". He wishes that Israel collapses from within like the soviet union did.

The reaction to his statements are ridiculous compared to what his statements actually are. It's really strange to see him say that the holocaust shouldn't be used as a basis for kicking 750,000 palestinians out of their homes, and then people from around the world decry his statements as "disgusting".

No, I'm not going to argue that he's the savior of Iran. I don't really have an opinion on him as a leader, but am just stating that his speeches on israel are taken way out of context and twisted to suit the "war with iran" agenda.
 
Yeah, and after we wipe out all those evil Muslims, we can then go after those psychotic Hindu's. And when we have eventually eliminated all the other religions, you Christians had better run. The only reason you aren't first is because who else is going to do all this killing in the name of God.

They are on the list,
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustionWe shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
 
There are extremists of course who say kill everyone! But they are shunned and loners generally, who are destined to be entrapped by the feds anyway, any large scale organization couldn't survive with a violent mentality because people, especially religiously inclined, want peace not war. There may be exceptions to this in poor obscure countries where education is poor of course, but we're talking in general.
.....
I hear a lot of rhetoric on this forum that Saddam Hussein was protecting Christians, Bashar al Assad was protecting Christians, etc. etc. when shocks me is, where does all this slaughter of Christians come from in American's minds? Do you think any Majority Muslim country has a policy of eradicating Christians?!

I don't know why you are "shocked" when you answered your own question. Yes there are extremists everywhere. And Saddam kept his foot on the neck of religious extremists because it suited his own purposes. With Saddam gone those very extremists engaged in horrendous sectarian violence, some of it aimed at Christians. That has nothing to do with the "Muslim majority". When Christian minorities fled the chaos of post Saddam Iraq, most of them headed to Syria. Those are facts. I'm not sure why that's "shocking" to you.
 
I've done extensive research into his quotes on Israel. Over and over he refers to the "Zionist regime" rather than israel.

Is there another regime in Israel we should be aware of? I'm sure our government didn't want to wipe Iraq off the map either, we just wanted to change their Saddam regime.
 
Is there another regime in Israel we should be aware of? I'm sure our government didn't want to wipe Iraq off the map either, we just wanted to change their Saddam regime.

Yea Sadaam failed us when he wasn't able to successfully invade Iran in the 80s
 
First of all, we are talking about Iran which does NOT slaughter Christians. Downtown Tehran looks like the US during the Christmas Season.

2nd- make sure your sources are viable- most news sources are not. Many stories are made up; many atrocities are also by US backed "rebels".

3rd- the so-called "Christian" country of America has killed a whole lot more Muslims than vs/vs. Maybe we ought to stop the wars?
Christians and Jews are protected ( In Iran), naturally , because those religions pre date Islam , others are not. Simple as that.
 
Last edited:
Ahmadinejad is a big government nazi just like the rest of the UN and NATO member nations.
That being said, he's right on foreign policy. At least Iran has never invaded a foreign country in its entire modern history.
 
Actually , Iranin govt is even bigger govt than most , read the Constitution they have and see everything they lay claim to.
 
Back
Top