We have a shot at 2016!!!!

[RPit]

No one can beat Rand. I'm like positive. But we need to get even better organized starting now. Get into the party, change their minds, change the mind of the leadership by have regular talks with them, make them 'think'.

Remember 3 years there will be no propaganda. You have 3 years of essential peace about the candidate. This is the time to introduce them when no one is talking bad about them. This is the time to make them a Rand Paul fan, even Hannity is. Before Hannity turns on him the election year, use his popularity NOW. Once we create a positive atmosphere for Rand, it will be hard to disengage them or remove Rand from their hearts.

Work on the people now before they malign his name and brainwash the people to reject him without thought. Period.

 

[Shane Harris]

No one can beat Rand. I'm like positive. But we need to get even better organized starting now. Get into the party, change their minds, change the mind of the leadership by have regular talks with them, make them 'think'.

Remember 3 years there will be no propaganda. You have 3 years of essential peace about the candidate. This is the time to introduce them when no one is talking bad about them. This is the time to make them a Rand Paul fan, even Hannity is. Before Hannity turns on him the election year, use his popularity NOW. Once we create a positive atmosphere for Rand, it will be hard to disengage them or remove Rand from their hearts.

Work on the people now before they malign his name and brainwash the people to reject him without thought. Period.

good points. but dont stop there. Continue what Ron started. try to turn people on to Ron's message, and then they will do the right thing on election day without telling them who to vote for. change hearts and minds for liberty! brushfires of freedom! make libertarians out of disenfranchised republicans! this is what happened to me!

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

Start attending those republican meetings and making friends and selling liberty. I plan on buying copies of Rand's book and giving them out to plant the seeds early.

 

[UpperDecker]

 

[Badger Paul]

I think any threshold a GOP nominee in 2016 is going to have to be taken seriously by both the media and rank n'file coters is can they win more than just old white people. Rand needs to take this seriously and construct a campaign which, as father said "Freedom brings everyone together!" Not "If I can win 80 percent of the white vote in Mingo County, we'll win!" Yeah, that and handing out free donuts at the polls gets you about 5,000 votes and Hilary Clinton in the White House.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Start attending those republican meetings and making friends and selling liberty. I plan on buying copies of Rand's book and giving them out to plant the seeds early.

I still maintain them to be GMO seeds. You are aware that this was the GOP's last chance for many, many years aren't you. Demographic is consistently growing in the other direction and away from what many view as the status quo. I think practical change will come from outside the circus tent. Not from inside. Not with the TEA PARTY Patriots growing from within the party. Basically a bunch of neocons.

You have a tall glass of water to drink. I'm not attacking you or anything. 7.9 unemployment rate and the sitting President just got re-elected. First time in history that's ever happened.

The Republican Party has to make friends with them. Not the other way around. How do you think that's going to work out?

 

[HigherVision]

I think the big picture's looking pretty good personally. This movement's really grown a lot and it's exciting.

 

[idiom]

I disagree with jnz. Yes, many are mad that Benton is going to help McConnell get re-elected in 2014. But look at what he's gained. A position within the establishment and he didn't even trade anything. Will surely see Rand helping Davis go after Lindsey.

... Didn't trade anything?

RAGE RAGE RAGE RAGE RAGE

 

[Natural Citizen]

The big picture is scribbled with big boy stuff though. Stuff neither party discussed. Nor the media. Speaking of GMO's though, what's Rands position on agribusiness and the relevant outliers that affect infrastructure, lobbying, it's effect on economy as well as it's impact versus individual liberty. Meaning the human flavor of "We The People". Not the artificial fellers who have purchased a homestead right on top of the 14th amendment and a few others we'll figger on later on in the list. Don't really want my seasonings considered drugs just because some .INC has a patent on nature all of a sudden. You know? Shaking hands with their left hand with the pharmaceutical industry and the food industry with their right. Seem to be simply using both feet to stomp the crap out of the science of the matter and education in the classroom relevant to it as it truly relates to the facts of the matter.

I've been working on a rather hefty list but that's a good ice breaker. What say's Rand?

 

[Inkblots]

Owning the Republican party of Iowa is, I think, a bigger advantage than we realize. It will suck hearing all the bullshit about Christie and Rubio for 3 years before showtime, but I guess we should be used to it. RAND PAUL 2016!!!!!

Rand could take office in 2017... the 10 year anniversary of the r{EVOL}ution from 2007.

This is a great point. Of all the state parties to capture, those in the early voting states are by far the most valuable. A win in Iowa - and with the local parties working for Rand, rather than against him, that is absolutely do-able - will help set the narrative for the entire early campaign and destroy the 'un-electable' canard that will no doubt be deployed against Rand, or indeed any other politician that steps up to be the Constitutionalist standard-bearer in 2016.

 

[Inkblots]

I still maintain them to be GMO seeds.

So they'll result in higher yields? Awesome, I need to start handing out those books like hotcakes.

 

[Odin]

This is a great point. Of all the state parties to capture, those in the early voting states are by far the most valuable. A win in Iowa - and with the local parties working for Rand, rather than against him, that is absolutely do-able - will help set the narrative for the entire early campaign and destroy the 'un-electable' canard that will no doubt be deployed against Rand, or indeed any other politician that steps up to be the Constitutionalist standard-bearer in 2016.

Need to get serious this time and start building up the ground forces immediately.

 

[jointhefightforfreedom]

Behold our ticket for 2016!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rand-Paul-Justin-Amash-2016/551208601571583

If they Run Republican i won't vote for them!

I will never Vote GOP or DEM again!

 

[Natural Citizen]

So they'll result in higher yields? Awesome, I need to start handing out those books like hotcakes.

By all means. Have at it. I always said they would sell themselves the very rope. Take Odin's advice. It's very good advice. Because critical thinkers and genuine doers are way ahead of the teleprompter and the pundit selling look the other way fairy tales. Way ahead.

 

[AceNZ]

If this was 20 yrs ago, if the Dems were still even halfway honest, then yes, we might have a shot in 2016. But they're not. They're criminally corrupt. The Chicago gangsters and their union thugs own this country now. In 4 years, they will have their claws in so deep that any serious competition will be impossible. I think there's a good chance that another Republican, much less an Independent or 3rd party, will never sit in the White House again. In addition, I'd wager the goons have their sights on the House next.

Those who voted Obama thinking that a win there would give Rand a shot in 2016 have shot themselves in the foot -- it's going to backfire, big time.

 

[ONUV]

any minorities rand can put on his ticket? that seems to be what you have to do these days.

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

If they Run Republican i won't vote for them!

I will never Vote GOP or DEM again!

 

[Jamesiv1]

then they fall apart. We are the future.

^This

+rep

 

[Jamesiv1]

Yes, they cheated. But even with all the cheating, rule-breaking, intimidation, media control, printing money, and throwing delegates out, we still got 190 delegates despite their best efforts. We also came within 4% of winning the popular vote in Iowa. Rand WILL win the popular primary votes in several states.

When you build a big enough tidal wave - or "Randslide," like we did in Kentucky - they simply can't keep up with it enough to cheat their way out of it. And we ran against the guy in charge of elections in the state, too... lol.

I like that

 

[Jamesiv1]

any minorities rand can put on his ticket? that seems to be what you have to do these days.

a righteous, Liberty-minded hispanic would be a great choice