Virginia Militias March To Protest Tyrant Governor’s Anti-Gun Legislation

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
Virginia Militias March To Protest Tyrant Governor’s Anti-Gun Legislation

Aside from a handful of local news outlets, no mainstream media companies are reporting on this story. However, at FreedomWire, we consider stories about defending our Second Amendment right to bear arms to be too important not to cover.

On Tuesday, armed patriots of the Virginia militia took to the streets to march in protest of far-Left authoritarian Governor Ralph Northam, who insists on disarming American citizens.

The “Open Carry Rally” reportedly drew hundreds of heavily armed activists who marched from the Capitol to the Siegel Center of Richmond, Virginia, where the state House and Senate gathered in person for a special legislative session.

Footage of the march that surfaced online features one dedicated patriot named Mike, who said the militia is fighting for “freedom, the Constitution in its entirety, freedom from the boot that continues to oppress us,” referring to Governor Northam’s unconstitutional gun restrictions.

Virginia Militia marches against gun control during Special Legislative Session in Richmond

“All the rights for all the people!” chanted a formation of about 100 armed activists marching throughout Richmond, Virginia on Tuesday.The group – led by the “Virginia Militia” – protested against gun control as Virginia held a special legislative session.Filmed by Ford Fischer

Posted by News2Share on Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Combatting the Left’s narrative, he clarified that they “stand for all people regardless of race, religion, or creed,” adding, “We stand for freedom. We are sick of being oppressed by a tyrannical government, including Ralph Northam, and the rest of his cronies that fill our senate and house in Virginia.”

When asked what message he would send to Governor Northam, Mike vowed, “As far as Northam? Virginia will not fall.”

Although the Virginia legislature’s special session that the militia marched to was not meeting to discuss gun laws, they gathered regardless to show the lawmakers that they will be persistent in defending their Second Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution.

Governor Northam, one of the most far-Left governors in the country, has relentlessly worked to ban the sale of guns and ammunition. He has signed several restrictive gun control bills into law and is now attempting to ban “assault weapons” entirely. This bill failed in its first go-round in February, but it is tabled until 2021.

This militia is everything America needs right now – a peaceful show of force to help these radical Leftists understand that the American people have power against a tyrannical government. That is part of what the Founding Fathers intended the Second Amendment for, after all, as the founding of our country is very literally based on freedom from tyranny, even if that means our own government.

More at: https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/08/...rotest-tyrant-governors-anti-gun-legislation/
 
How hard core is a militia protesting gun control while wearing their government mandated face diapers? All hats, no cattle.

The irony is thick.
 
How hard core is a militia protesting gun control while wearing their government mandated face diapers? All hats, no cattle.

The irony is thick.


A little like making sure you have the proper "permit" before protesting against whatever. Kinda dulls the edge, renders the whole thing a bit farcical.

+ rep
 
False equivalence much?

Mmmmm....how? Some people believe in wearing pants. Some do not. Some people believe in wearing masks. Some do not. Is someone who believes that masks are helpful for slowing the pandemic wrong for wearing a mask just because it's government mandated? Don't forget that at one point the government was demanding that you NOT wear masks! Masks have the added benefit of hiding one's identity from the police. What's the benefit of pants? Why not protest in boxers?
 
Are you complaining that they are wearing government mandated pants?

I have learned that if you don’t get it, then you just don’t fucking get it. Pants have been socially accepted norms for hundreds of years. You have been bleating on about masks for 6 months. Big difference.
 
This militia is everything America needs right now – a peaceful show of force to help these radical Leftists understand that the American people have power against a tyrannical government.

I disagree.

The time for "peaceful" anything is long past.

Our enemies are in the streets night after night, while we sit in stupefied amazement and hope like hell they don't show up on our street.

They tell us how it is gong to be, whether you like it or not.

And corporate AmeriKa falls all over itself to support and donate billions of dollars to "the cause", media and academia toe the line, the ruling class mostly do the same.

Why? Because they are scared and hedging their bets...reason, logic, facts, freedom, historical precedent and "peaceful protest" is meaningless to an enstupidated, drugged up populace. They understand fear, power and force however. And that is what it will take to win. The will to inflict more pain, to make the great unwashed fear us more than the leftist mob.
 
I have learned that if you don’t get it, then you just don’t $#@!ing get it. Pants have been socially accepted norms for hundreds of years. You have been bleating on about masks for 6 months. Big difference.

It's not simply an issue of "socially acceptable norms." Condoms weren't "socially acceptable norms".....until they were. I get it. You don't think masks make you any safer from COVID-19. Other people do. Reasonable people can disagree on this. It's not reasonable to attack people doing something positive and assume they are just following a mandate when they might be doing what they think is best for their health. Yep. I watched the Ben Swann videos too. And as much as I like him, he misrepresented the science. It's funny, when the anti-lockdown protesters in Michigan were in the news they were attacked from the left both for wearing masks (that's racist like a KKK hood) and not wearing masks (how dare they put other people's health at risk). It's a shame to see similar protesters being attacked from the right.
 
I disagree.

The time for "peaceful" anything is long past.

Our enemies are in the streets night after night, while we sit in stupefied amazement and hope like hell they don't show up on our street.

They tell us how it is gong to be, whether you like it or not.

And corporate AmeriKa falls all over itself to support and donate billions of dollars to "the cause", media and academia toe the line, the ruling class mostly do the same.

Why? Because they are scared and hedging their bets...reason, logic, facts, freedom, historical precedent and "peaceful protest" is meaningless to an enstupidated, drugged up populace. They understand fear, power and force however. And that is what it will take to win. The will to inflict more pain, to make the great unwashed fear us more than the leftist mob.

Patience, AF, patience. These thugs "in the streets night after night" are mostly confined to the urban areas, and even there, downtown areas.

You need to be a little bit more like Todd Evans on this point and just succeed the cities. Not worth fighting over at this point.

But when they start expanding beyond the cities into the suburbs and rural areas, then will come the chance to see how these funded commies fare against freedom loving Americans fighting with passion and heart. If enough of them take a stand, and defeat them outside the cities in the rural areas, then reoccupation of the urban centers can happen, but not before.
 
It's not simply an issue of "socially acceptable norms." Condoms weren't "socially acceptable norms".....until they were. I get it. You don't think masks make you any safer from COVID-19. Other people do. Reasonable people can disagree on this. It's not reasonable to attack people doing something positive and assume they are just following a mandate when they might be doing what they think is best for their health. Yep. I watched the Ben Swann videos too. And as much as I like him, he misrepresented the science. It's funny, when the anti-lockdown protesters in Michigan were in the news they were attacked from the left both for wearing masks (that's racist like a KKK hood) and not wearing masks (how dare they put other people's health at risk). It's a shame to see similar protesters being attacked from the right.

My point is this. Marching in the streets to “protect” your right to defend yourself while being afraid of getting sick is not a great way to show force. These guys are afraid of getting the sniffles, but are ready to fight tyrants? It’s weak.
 
I disagree.

The time for "peaceful" anything is long past.

Our enemies are in the streets night after night, while we sit in stupefied amazement and hope like hell they don't show up on our street.

They tell us how it is gong to be, whether you like it or not.

And corporate AmeriKa falls all over itself to support and donate billions of dollars to "the cause", media and academia toe the line, the ruling class mostly do the same.

Why? Because they are scared and hedging their bets...reason, logic, facts, freedom, historical precedent and "peaceful protest" is meaningless to an enstupidated, drugged up populace. They understand fear, power and force however. And that is what it will take to win. The will to inflict more pain, to make the great unwashed fear us more than the leftist mob.
People need to be shifted towards what we need in phases or they will reject it.
The sheeple have to start somewhere.
 
Here's the much better video to watch, where the Police asked them to get off the street. They did not. "A free man does not need to ask for permission."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Urh03LZBuPls/

The police allegedly backed down, but the video ends with both sides still in the street.

Some quotes from Mike Dunn, the militia leader (speaking unmasked):

Talking to the large police officer on his left who keeps telling him to get out off the street and get on the sidewalk:

“Do you remember the oath you swore? I want to have a simple conversation with you.”


Policeman: “I’m not asking you.”


Mike: “I’m asking you.”


Policeman: “No, I’m not asking you. You get on the sidewalk.”


Mike: “Do you remember the oath you swore?”


Policeman: “Yeah.”


Mike: “Alright, can you quote it for me?”


Policeman tilts his head but says nothing.


Mike: “You can’t even quote the oath you swore to.”


Policeman tilts his head again and says: “On the sidewalk.”


Mike says nothing and looks him straight in the face.


Policeman: “On the sidewalk.”


Mike moves his shoulders up and down, but does not move, and says nothing.


The policeman to Mike’s right now starts speaking to Mike, but it is hard to hear what he is saying, due to the mask.


Mike: “Alright, first of all you’re violating my civil liberties. You understand that, right?


Big policeman 1 keeps saying “Hey” and tilting his head to the sidewalk.


Mike ignores him and continues talking to the second policeman: “Which means you have to have a reason to arrest me.”


With Mike’s face now pointing away from the camera, it is hard to hear what they say next, but he is pointing at the street, and apparently pointing out that it is public property.


Next, Mike turns his back to the policemen, without giving up his position, and addresses the other militia members behind him: “Do we ask permission, or no?”


We can’t hear everything the others are saying, but Mike does turn around and informs the second policeman that they are not asking for their permission, but he understands where they are coming from.


Another short dialog ensues, while a crowd is now gathering and taking photos.


Mike then points down at the road and says: “This is public property. This is paid for by taxpayers. Right or wrong? Do you own this?” (while pointing down at the road.)


The policeman apparently gives no reply. More dialog that is not intelligible in the video continues.


At one point Mike turns around, points to people outside of the camera view on the street (maybe other police officers), and asks:


“Well let me ask you a question. Why are they standing there? Tell me why?”


He then turns towards somebody standing out of camera range and says:


“Hey, I’m not going to use your name. I know who you are. What’s the difference in me standing here, and those standing here. Are they better because they have suits?” (apparently referring to the state delegates)


Pointing towards the police standing on the side of the road: “Are you better because you have a badge?”


More dialog continues, including with the camera man filming, and then he walks to the side and apparently talks to some other armed people (another militia group??) who were standing on the sidewalk and asks:


“Hey gentlemen. They told the suits and the politicians they could stand here, but they told me I can’t. What’s the difference between us and a business suit?”


Some dialog ensues and some of the green clad armed men start to slowly walk into the street, and Mike says:


“You’re either with us, or you’re not. It’s that simple. I’m on the street. I see some of you already on the street. That’s how its gonna be.”


The second policeman then walks over and starts addressing this second group of armed men, apparently trying to convince them not to go into the street, while Mike is urging them to join him.


The second policeman then turns around and walks back towards Mike, and gets a bit closer this time.


Voices are getting louder now, and it is hard to hear the dialog.


Mike: “I’m allowed to stand here.”


Somebody on the sidelines apparently says something about “taking it to the courts,” to which Mike replies: “We’ve already done that. We’ve exhausted the courts.”


The policeman starts talking again, but we cannot hear him with the mask on.


Mike says: “Sir, if you move the suits, I’ll gladly move for you (too). You tell the suits they got to stay on the sidewalk, but until then I’m not moving. Free men do not ask for permission.”


The policeman continues talking, and Mike says:


“Were you here on January 20th? Do you remember the ‘we will not comply’ chant? That means something. We will not comply.”


We can now clearly hear the policeman threatening to arrest Mike. Mike replies:


“Well you’ve asked me (to move to the sidewalk), and my answer is ‘no.'”


“If the suits can stand here, then I can stand here too. You move the suits, and I’ll move. You don’t move the suits, I stand here.”


“Because free men don’t ask for permission.”


He then turns his back on the policeman, and stands his ground.

 
Are you complaining that they are wearing government mandated pants?

Seriously. If your going to wear pants while opposing arbitrary government controls, why wear jeans that are in full compliance with 15 USC 1192 (Flammable Fabrics Act). Mind numbed goobermint quislings is what they are. You want to impress the public with your holier-than-thou'ness then you show up in homespun trousers or none at all. Jeez!

XNN
 
Seriously. If your going to wear pants while opposing arbitrary government controls, why wear jeans that are in full compliance with 15 USC 1192 (Flammable Fabrics Act). Mind numbed goobermint quislings is what they are. You want to impress the public with your holier-than-thou'ness then you show up in homespun trousers or none at all. Jeez!

XNN

Yeah, and like they have seatbelt laws and stuff, so clearly they can make you take the vaccine. False equivalence is just that.
 
Yeah, and like they have seatbelt laws and stuff, so clearly they can make you take the vaccine. False equivalence is just that.

If the government determines that you have failed to comply with what they have determined to be the appropriate course of treatment for a disease, they absolutely can take you into custody and force that course of treatment on you.

Man held for failing to take TB medicine, Rare Health Dept. action lands Tucsonan, 49, in jail
https://tucson.com/news/local/crime/man-held-for-failing-to-take-tb-medicine/article_d9183573-6664-5152-bbce-9ef26faca3b7.html

"Usually we have very good, cooperative patients," she said.

If the Health Department has reason to believe that a person is not taking needed medication it will ensure that he does so by going to the home each day to watch him take it, Woodcock said. Going to the courts is a last resort.

Last year, another man infected with TB was incarcerated at a hospital jail ward in Phoenix after he went into a convenience store without a mask. Health officials said he endangered others and as a result a court order was obtained for his arrest.

Ignorance of the extent of legal authority and the potential ramifications doesn't mean you won't get rammed.

XNN
 
Back
Top