Black lesbian couple in Virginia allegedly chased by white locals with guns until they crashed with severe injuries

That was just one dude. I was talking about gangs of thugs. You know, the ones who give little tiny bones to keep the 'Merikans happy and compliant [like Trump did with that "fantastic/beautiful" DC gun law].
Pol Pot was White?
 
Last edited:
That was just one dude. I was talking about gangs of thugs. You know, the ones who give little tiny bones to keep the 'Merikans happy and compliant [like Trump did with that "fantastic/beautiful" DC gun law].
Tell me about Pol Pot.
 
Then you are talking about Jews, not whites.

You have to try to keep up too. No, I was talking about whites specifically, not Jews. Though, most of them do have an AIPAC guy [except for Trump, he has an AIPAC girl]:

CONgress/Senate/Presidents


Tell me about Pol Pot.

I don't want to derail the thread. Plus that was in the olden days. And also because I don't want to detract from the Epstein Files, even though I have posted more about that than even you and everybody else on this site [see Whitney Webb threads]. You just don't like to read [maybe because Trump was mentioned, several times?].
 
Last edited:
That could be a statistic that verifies my hypothesis, if one were to trust such unreliable measures (like govt statistics).
How does that "verify" your hypothesis which was:

"So assuming that the victims of white teachers are usually white males, we might assume that they are more likely to complain about the situation, more likely to feel like victims, more likely to be taken serious when reporting such incidents, and such teachers are more likely to make the news."

The stats I gave was based on convictions, not based on "the news." But if we're going to play the "Well the news is just biased then" that totally undercuts @Anti Federalist's arguments. Either the conviction statistics can be trusted, or they can't.

Here you go...



Okay. We have a white European Hassidic Jew caught with child porn on his flip phone who gets busted by some black men. Was this submitted in favor of your hypothesis or mine? :confused:
 
Pol Pot was White?
Pol Pot and Mao certainly weren't black. And supposedly Asians are the least likely to commit crimes, at least hear in America. Anyhow, Stalin was white. Hilter was white. The people who planned and carreid out the Dresden bombings were white. Not to mention everyone involved in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagisaki. Vlad the impaler? White. Most of the serial killers prior to the 21st century? White. Vladimir Putin and Voldymyr Zelinsky? White. George W. Bush's entire cabinent (with the exception of General Powell who resigned early after realizing he had been played)? White.

But don't think I didn't notice your attempt to change the subject. Child rapists are disproportionately white. So much so that even though black men are more likely to rape adults, the sheer number of white child rapists put white people in the lead for rape in general. Everyone from those pedophile priests to Republican politicians (Franklin cover-up), to Epstein's Island (overwhelmingly white). Didd seems to have been mostly focused on adults. While it was strange as hell that he would have an underage Usher sleep over, so far there's not been one credible child rape allegation against him. And yeah, I know R Kelly is in prison for child rape. But he didn't seem to have a whole rape gang going on the way Didddy had for adults and Epstein had for children.
 
You're the one who can't deal with reality. The total number of non-whites killed by whites is greater than the number of non-blacks killed by blacks.

You've been looking at percentages and forgetting that we have them outnumbered. As a result, you assume this to be the size of a mouse and that to be the size of an elephant. But the total numbers are hardly different at all. You refuse to look at hard numbers because then you might not be able to call your silly perception "reality".

In this case percentages are what matters.

But ultimately it doesn't really matter as long as you're not in favor of race or group based laws.

The law needs to treat people as individuals, not groups. We need to eliminate discrimination laws against private individuals and business owners, including corporations (group ownership). We need to eliminate any laws that are race or group based. I can't think of any reason why any law should even mention race.
 
In this case percentages are what matters.

But ultimately it doesn't really matter as long as you're not in favor of race or group based laws.

The law needs to treat people as individuals, not groups. We need to eliminate discrimination laws against private individuals and business owners, including corporations (group ownership). We need to eliminate any laws that are race or group based. I can't think of any reason why any law should even mention race.

The funny thing about the percentages is that they flip racially depending on time frame (20th century more white serial killers vs 21st century more black serial killer) and type of crime. (More black rapists of adults vs more white rapists of children). So if someone wants to go fishing for statistics that will make him or her feel racially superior, if you fish long enough you'll find something when it's really just random noise sprinkled in with socioeconomic factors. It would be nice of people actually used stats to try to make the world a better place but alas that's asking too much.
 
Pol Pot and Mao certainly weren't black. And supposedly Asians are the least likely to commit crimes, at least hear in America. Anyhow, Stalin was white. Hilter was white. The people who planned and carreid out the Dresden bombings were white. Not to mention everyone involved in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagisaki. Vlad the impaler? White. Most of the serial killers prior to the 21st century? White. Vladimir Putin and Voldymyr Zelinsky? White. George W. Bush's entire cabinent (with the exception of General Powell who resigned early after realizing he had been played)? White.

But don't think I didn't notice your attempt to change the subject. Child rapists are disproportionately white. So much so that even though black men are more likely to rape adults, the sheer number of white child rapists put white people in the lead for rape in general. Everyone from those pedophile priests to Republican politicians (Franklin cover-up), to Epstein's Island (overwhelmingly white). Didd seems to have been mostly focused on adults. While it was strange as hell that he would have an underage Usher sleep over, so far there's not been one credible child rape allegation against him. And yeah, I know R Kelly is in prison for child rape. But he didn't seem to have a whole rape gang going on the way Didddy had for adults and Epstein had for children.
Tell me about Rwanda.
 
And I see another response by an ignored racist member. Good to know I'm making an impact.
 
Back
Top