VIDEO: Judge Napolitano vs. Stossel (NSA Spying)

nat-audio-magma-tube-amplifier-1.jpg


Please.
 
Govt CAN and WILL kill you over what Facebook knows about you.

Stossel needs to understand that giving up Privacy can only directly comprimise ones Safety. How many Jews would still be around today if Nazis were never blanket allwed to find out who was Jewish?
 
Stuart Varney went into full-bore braying-jackass mode there. "OMG!! Oh noes!! Extremisim!! OMG!! Terrism!! OMG!! Ur extremist!"

I don't think the man made so much as one, single substantive point.

And Stossel's "defense" of his position was pathetically lame. "I just assume" ... "I don't know, but" ... "I'm not sure, but" ... "I just don't care" ...
 
Last edited:
Stossel really disappoints me on this. I can't believe he takes this position. Judge Nap is right on. Give them the TRUTH Judge.
 
disappointing is an understatement referencing Stossel here.

boy do I miss the judge's show. when I hear people defend this spying and fisa court bullshit it really makes me miss that hour a day of good (read done-well) news programming. "defending freedom"
 
Oh wait, I see he already works there.

John Stossel: Advertisers Already Collect our Data, so the NSA is Our Friend
Posted by Ryan W. McMaken on June 12, 2013 01:13 PM

Over at Reason, John Stossel is telling libertarians to quit being all worked up about the NSA and quit worrying about privacy.

This is the same guy, of course, who has specifically said that the US Military is a force for wondrous good in the world, and that various invasions such as Bosnia and Vietnam have all been, on the whole, good things.

In other words, his position now is the same as his position then: Hey libertarians, stop criticizing the government so much.

Stossel is one of the those libertarians for whom it is fine to criticize welfare for poor people (which costs next to nothing compared to the military apparatus in this country), while the police state is always above reproach. Why, only cranks would ever think the US Government and its spies and uranium bombs are anything other than super duper!

Stossel is one of the species of libertarians who, like Charles Murray, are supposed to be these great radical libertarians, but who in reality never actually criticize the core of the state. For such people, the essence of libertarianism is to point out some waste or abuse here and there, but to never actually attack the heart of the state, which is its military-prison-taxation system. That latter stuff, they tell us, is always pretty much okay, and the best that it could possibly be at the given time, and we shouldn't waste our time criticizing it, except to maybe call for a radically huge 1% cut in spending on it. The Fourth Amendment is a dead letter? Drones incinerating American citizens without trial? Who cares? There are poor people buying lobster with food stamps! That's the real threat.

UPDATE
Writes a friend: Stossel is an "efficiency expert for the Leviathan State."
 
disappointing is an understatement referencing Stossel here.

boy do I miss the judge's show. when I hear people defend this spying and fisa court bullshit it really makes me miss that hour a day of good (read done-well) news programming. "defending freedom"
Yeah, disappoint is an understatement. Should have said i find his discourse disgusting and phony.
 
It seems like Stossel is one of those libertarians who thinks that supporting abortion rights and gay marriage is a more important aspect of libertarianism than defending the Bill of Rights.
 
I never was impressed with John Stossel. Now it turns out he's worse than Glenn Beck. The government can do whatever it wants just so long as he doesn't "get worked up about it?"
 
Back
Top