USS JOHN MCCAIN to intercept N.Korean ship!

Named after the Senator's dad and grandad.

They are Sr and Jr, the senator is 3rd.

Quite right, but it still bears the trademark.;):D

It pays to be in a line of succession. From my Navy days I remember ships could only be named after the deceased. It may have changed but as I remember it it would have to be named after his predecessors.
 
Intercepting it will be seen as an act of war if they try to board.


Why is our government intent on infuriating the other governments around the world?
 
Intercepting it will be seen as an act of war if they try to board.


Why is our government intent on infuriating the other governments around the world?

That's the work by a Global Empire Police Force. It might interfere with the Chinese cargoships heading to Mexico to dump there load of Cheap Walmart goods on there way to the States... :rolleyes:

On that note wouldn't these be the problem of the United Nations? What good are they and what's there stand on North Korea's work for ICBMs?

My opinion is leave them alone. Why does our nation mess with everyone!?!?!?! Only when we are threatened directly we should intervene...... :mad:
 
This is the same boat involved in that incident with the Chinese sub last week.
 
Brazil, Russia, India, and China are laughing all the way to the bank.

Watching the 21st century Roman Imperial Empire in it's over reached, over stretched, over taxed, over spent.... collapse in a slow death of debt, deficits, and worthless fiat money.

Then the duopoly in Washington will SELLOUT the country to whatever preserves the last morsels of their existence and power of the American Sheeple.
 

USS John McCain in battle with USS Barack Obama


WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers are considering enacting a policy that prohibits the naming of military vessels after current politicians. The reason is because of the political tensions that have been morphed into military conflicts between U.S. vessels.
The USS John McCain chased the USS Barack Obama into the Yellow Sea, and began to fire at the USS Barack Obama. Last word is that the USS Barack Obama is cornered near Tianjin, China. The USS Joseph Biden is headed to the region to help stop the USS John McCain. But here is where things get tricky: the USS Joe Biden is only an LHA (i.e., amphibious assault ship), while the USS John McCain is a BB (i.e., battleship) and is expected to receive backup by the USS Lindsey Graham, which is also a BB.

The USS Lindsey Graham is sailing towards the Yellow Sea, and it has vowed to destroy any and all ships named after Democrats, with the exception of USS John Kennedy. "We'll leave the Kennedy alone," said the USS Lindsey Graham. The USS Teddy Roosevelt and USS Ronald Reagan are trying to broker a truce between Republican and Democrat ships.

So far, the USS Nancy Pelosi hasn't made any remarks. The USS Ron Paul and USS Dennis Kucinich have issued a joint statement, saying that this can be expected when the Congress spends so much money on the military-industrial complex, i.e., the war machine.

http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/index.php?itemid=4058

Hilarious.
 
Watching the 21st century Roman Imperial Empire in it's over reached, over stretched, over taxed, over spent.... collapse in a slow death of debt, deficits, and worthless fiat money.

From "How The Irish Saved Western Civilization," by Thomas Cahill:

pg. 26: "By the fifth century, in the years before the complete collapse of Roman government, the imperial approach to taxation had produced a caste as hopeless as any in history. Their rapacious exactions, taken wherever and whenever they could, were the direct result of their desperation about their own increasingly unpayable tax bills. As these nerved-up outcasts commenced to prey on whoever was weaker than they, the rich became even richer. The great landowners ate up the little ones, the tax base shrank still further, and the middle classes, never encouraged by the Roman state, began to disappear from the face of the earth. Nor would they return till the appearance of the Italian mercantile families of the high Middle Ages."

pg. 29: "...Though it is difficult to imagine the Pax Romana lasting as long as it did without the increasing militarization of the Imperium Romanum, the Romans themselves were never happy about their army. It suggested dictatorship, rather than those good old republican values, and they preferred to avert their eyes, keeping themselves carefully ignorant of the army's essential contribution to their well-being. With the moral decay of republican resolve, the army became more and more a reserve of non-Romans, half-Romanized barbarian mercenaries and servants sent in the stead of freemen who couldn't be bothered. In the last days of the empire, men commonly mutilated themselves to escape service, though such a crime was--in theory--punishable by torture and death. Military levies, sent to the great estates, met such resistance that influential landowners were allowed to send money, instead of men, to the army. In 409, faced with an increasingly undefended frontier, the emperor announced the impossible: henceforth, slaves would be permitted, even encouraged, to enlist, and for their service they would receive a bounty and their freedom. By this point, it was sometimes difficult to tell the Romans from the barbarians--at least along the frontier."


pg. 29: "There are, no doubt, lessons here for the contemporary reader. The changing character of the native population, brought about through unremarked pressures on porous borders; the creation of an increasingly unwieldy and rigid bureaucracy, whose own survival becomes its overriding goal; the despising of the military and the avoidance of service by established families, while its offices present unprecedented opportunity for marginal men to whom its ranks had once been closed; the lip service paid to values long dead; the pretense that we still are what we once were; the increasing concentrations of the populace into richer and poorer by way of a corrupt tax system, and the desperation that inevitably follows; the aggrandizement of executive power at the expense of the legislature; ineffectual legislation promulgated with great show; the moral vocation of the man at the top to maintain order at all costs, while growing blind to the cruel dilemmas of ordinary life--these are all themes with which our world is familiar, nor are they the God-given property of any party or political point of view, even though we often act as if they were. At least, the emperor could not heap his economic burdens on posterity by creating long-term public debt, for floating capital had not yet been conceptualized..."
 
From "How The Irish Saved Western Civilization," by Thomas Cahill:

pg. 26: "By the fifth century, in the years before the complete collapse of Roman government, the imperial approach to taxation had produced a caste as hopeless as any in history. Their rapacious exactions, taken wherever and whenever they could, were the direct result of their desperation about their own increasingly unpayable tax bills. As these nerved-up outcasts commenced to prey on whoever was weaker than they, the rich became even richer. The great landowners ate up the little ones, the tax base shrank still further, and the middle classes, never encouraged by the Roman state, began to disappear from the face of the earth. Nor would they return till the appearance of the Italian mercantile families of the high Middle Ages."

Among the Italian mercantile families of the high Middle Ages was the House of Medici, to which the following quote is attributed:

"Money to get power, power to protect money."
 
Among the Italian mercantile families of the high Middle Ages was the House of Medici, to which the following quote is attributed:

"Money to get power, power to protect money."

The Medici family were the prototype for the Rothschilds. As evil as the Medici's were they at least funded the Renaissance. What have the Rothschilds every funded apart from war
 
Breaking News: The USS Nancy Pelosi is in the Red Sea and states that the CIA misled her and told her that the confrontation was not in the Yellow Sea
 
"USS JOHN MCCAIN to intercept N.Korean ship! "

What an unfortunate name for a ship, even though the elder McCain likely earned everything he received. Too bad about the grandson or is it his son?

I do not care what Korea does. It is none of our business and not the stupid UN's business. All they ever do is vote to "condemn" something and offer "sanctions" that hurt people and do nothing to curb bad government. UN is a tool, media is a tool, and our government is a tool.

Unless Korea actually committs an act of war against us we need to keep our government's mouth shut.
 
Last edited:
"USS JOHN MCCAIN to intercept N.Korean ship! "

What an unfortunate name for a ship, even though the elder McCain likely earned everything he received. Too bad about the grandson or is it his son?

I do not care what Korea does. It is none of our business and not the stupid UN's business. All they ever do is vote to "condemn" something and offer "sanctions" that hurt people and do nothing to curb bad government. UN is a tool, media is a tool, and our government is a tool.

Unless Korea actually committs an act of war against us we need to keep our government's mouth shut.

Interventionism is Extremely Big Business.

Whether it was Thomas Paine who first said it, I don't know. But it was in Rights of Man that I first read that whereas taxes were once levied to wage war, war is now waged to levy taxes.

"When it shall be said in any country in the world, my poor are happy; neither ignorance nor distress is to be found among them; my jails are empty of prisoners, my streets of beggars; the aged are not in want, the taxes are not oppressive; the rational world is my friend, because I am the friend of its happiness: when these things can be said, then may that country boast its constitution and its government."

-- Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, Part II, 1792
 
Slap McCain's fat ass on it--call his reserve number up--and see if the arrogant old fossil is mature enough yet to live up to his father.
 
Intercepting it will be seen as an act of war if they try to board.


Why is our government intent on infuriating the other governments around the world?

Firstly, the aren't intercepting it, that's not apart of the UN resolution. They are simply going to search it when the boat docks at a port. Of course, why would we want nuclear material going to hostile enemies who shout "DEATH TO AMERICA!" and so on? Logical thinking is your friend.
 
America isn't doing this, the American government is. Please don't confuse the two!

This is a VERY important point. North Koreans are surely great people individually, especially if they knew what was happening in the real world. The problem is that people are just uneducated. In North Korea, in China, in Europe, and the US. They don't see the truth and/or don't want to see the truth. I have the feeling that the vast majority of people would see Ron Paul as a hero, not a kook, if they could really understand what he was all about and how the system works.

But I'm getting off topic. Good irony though. John McCain fully supports this effort I'm sure.
 
Back
Top