- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,023
The funniest(?) part of the battlefield theory is that, in this scenario, the entire world must be considered a battlefield to achieve the desired end state.
Well, they don't call it a "Global War on
The funniest(?) part of the battlefield theory is that, in this scenario, the entire world must be considered a battlefield to achieve the desired end state.
Chaos is the best way to achieve that too.Murdering everyone would make the world a lot more orderly.
https://x.com/NotGovernor/status/1963722706555478216
If they were cartel members (violent beasts) then I don't much care if someone explodes them. Do I trust the US Gov beasts to not do this to innocents though? Hell no. Do I want them restrained by "due process" magic spells? Well, I want them restrained in every way possible—so sure, I'll take what I can get.
I can't possibly imagine any future negative consequences of the president having the authority to preemptively murder anyone, anywhere with precisely zero due process.
Pepperidge Farm remembers a time when the majority on this forum thought poorly of presidential drones strikes even in an actual warzone with congressional authorization.
Now, apparently, the president needs neither the warzone nor the permission of congress.
Gee I wonder what the difference might be
Well thats because the wars in the middle east were sold to us on the idea of preventing war through preventative war...
These types of threats aren't new. The USA is just doing something about it because we have a smart president.
That's right. No one can deny that if you burn down your own house you don't have to worry about your house burning down any more.
Of course, it takes a sociopathic narcissist to actually advocate doing the smart thing by doing something that completely stupid. Or a bot. Same thing.
When both your supposed problems and your supposed solutions are the same as the situation in the middle east two decades ago, no one is going to believe you when you say it's different this time.What's happening in South America is an example of the Trump doctrine.
Certain governments in South America have gotten uncomfortably close with people that threaten the United States.
This is through dictatorial rule and being propped up by adversarial nations.
These types of threats aren't new. The USA is just doing something about it because we have a smart president.
https://x.com/NotGovernor/status/1963722706555478216
If they were cartel members (violent beasts) then I don't much care if someone explodes them. Do I trust the US Gov beasts to not do this to innocents though? Hell no. Do I want them restrained by "due process" magic spells? Well, I want them restrained in every way possible—so sure, I'll take what I can get.
When both your supposed problems and your supposed solutions are the same as the situation in the middle east two decades ago, no one is going to believe you when you say it's different this time.
It's amazing how every post is it's own separate response with no connection to any previous or future post.The middle east was a different kind of problem because the middle east didn't invade us.
Venezula is basically a failed state and millions of people have been fleeing Venezuela and a lot of them have been coming here to claim the United States as theirs.
That was the democrat policy to just let the Venezuelans invade and do nothing about it.
Stopping the invasion is the only real solution.
It
It's amazing how every post is it's own separate response with no connection to any previous or future post.
Are you attempting to imply that the drug traffickers on the speedboat were on their way to immigrate?
Anyway, there are more middle easterners than Venezuelans in the US and immigration is not invasion.
It's amazing how every post is it's own separate response with no connection to any previous or future post.
"If". That is the key word. Because of the word "if", we have due process to attempt to determine "if".
[...]
No one is mourning proven murderers being giving the death penalty. But some may mourn the loss of all of our rights (and civility) being exploded.
I think that's Patrick's whole point. IF these really were just cartel thugs, then no great loss. But he doesn't trust the US government to get the "IF" part right (or to care much about getting it wrong). He wants the US government "restrained in every way possible", but he doesn't put much stock in "'due process' magic spells" - because the government willfully violating "due process" is the same one being expected to respect it,
The United States has ordered the deployment of 10 F-35 fighter jets to a Puerto Rico airfield for operations targeting drug cartels
![]()
US deploying stealth fighter jets to Caribbean for drug fight as tensions with Venezuela rise, sources say
The disclosure came hours after the Pentagon accused Venezuela of a "highly provocative" flight on Thursday by fighter jets over a U.S. Navy warship.www.reuters.com
You don't say doors arent needed because if someone wants to really get into your house they can just open the door and walk in.
There's a solution of course and that's to lock your door
When a foreign government forces people to invade our country its an invasion and its an act of war.
They even took the government to court when the government tried to deport them.
So there is no consent involved here. Consent means you can say no. You can't even tell these people no. They use lawfare to try to steal your country.
Can you explain exactly how that speedboat was going to invade our country?