US government vs. "antisemitism"

Massie casts the only "no" vote against "Anti-Zionism = Antisemitism" resolution

They're at it again:

At least Massie had some company this time:

https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1785775064996069526
EnV4DgY.png


https://twitter.com/AndrewSolender/status/1785743245353287855
[link: https://www.axios.com/2024/04/30/house-democrats-mike-johnson-antisemitism]
NCHykCT.png


https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1785749895443312825
wDowq35.png
 
Last edited:
Even though H.R. 6090 "only" applies to educational institutions and programs that receive federal funding, I believe it is none the less both an offense to the First Amendment, and non-legally binding, because federal agencies have no right to restrict free speech, and the IHRA's own definition is a "working" definition, and "non-legally binding".*

The list of instances in which "antisemitism" is workingly defined by them is rather long and all-encompassing.*

Here is the Bill that Passed the House:*
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text

Here is the definition:*
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
 
Even though H.R. 6090 "only" applies to educational institutions and programs that receive federal funding, I believe it is none the less both an offense to the First Amendment, and non-legally binding, because federal agencies have no right to restrict free speech, and the IHRA's own definition is a "working" definition, and "non-legally binding".*

The list of instances in which "antisemitism" is workingly defined by them is rather long and all-encompassing.*

Here is the Bill that Passed the House:*
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text

Here is the definition:*
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

This is a play straight from one of those "WEF members"who said they will be going after the First Amendment/FreeSpeech in the US.

They dont want any fair criticism of Israel.
 
Even though H.R. 6090 "only" applies to educational institutions and programs that receive federal funding, I believe it is none the less both an offense to the First Amendment, and non-legally binding, because federal agencies have no right to restrict free speech, and the IHRA's own definition is a "working" definition, and "non-legally binding".*

The list of instances in which "antisemitism" is workingly defined by them is rather long and all-encompassing.*

Here is the Bill that Passed the House:*
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text

Here is the definition:*
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

And the sponsor isn't even a Dispensationalist or a Jew. He's Catholic.
 
CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #264:

Congress Pushes to Silence Israel Critics with "Antisemitism Awareness" Bill
https://rumble.com/v4svlmr-congress...critics-with-antisemitism-awareness-bill.html
{Glenn Greenwald | 02 May 2024}


 
This bill is wrong on many parts of the bill content.

The fact they dont allow any form of criticism towards Israel during its wars.
Is a red flag.
 
And the sponsor isn't even a Dispensationalist or a Jew. He's Catholic.

He's from New York City. But, here's how the House works with these things. They distribute the sponsorships for political reasons,
they are like trophies. There are 61 other co-sponsors. Meaning, 62 Congresspeople wanted to make damn sure their names were on that list. There's horse trading. It's a feather in the cap, how the machine works. All other 61 sponsors are equally involved.

This was just ONE of many "antisemitism" bills with various "sponsors" by this current House.
It just happened to be the one they voted on.

see them all: https://www.congress.gov/search?q={"source":"all","congress":"118","search":"Antisemitism"}

Like Seth Magaziner. You know he backs this but "did not vote" to appear like there's some kind of conflict of interest.
Sometimes they don't vote at all when they don't want to show their hands, and know the result is already affirmed.
 
Last edited:
He's from New York City. But, here's how the House works with these things. They distribute the sponsorships for political reasons,
they are like trophies. There are 61 other co-sponsors. Meaning, 62 Congresspeople wanted to make damn sure their names were on that list. There's horse trading. It's a feather in the cap, how the machine works. All other 61 sponsors are equally involved.

This was just ONE of many "antisemitism" bills with various "sponsors" by this current House.
It just happened to be the one they voted on.

see them all: https://www.congress.gov/search?q={"source":"all","congress":"118","search":"Antisemitism"}

Like Seth Magaziner. You know he backs this but "did not vote" to appear like there's some kind of conflict of interest.
Sometimes they don't vote at all when they don't want to show their hands, and know the result is already affirmed.

Damn. Look at at all of those! Must be the ADL or some other B'nai B'rith group cranks that shit out.
 
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

But if any "ethnic white" nation were to announce that they had a right to self determination, the MMOs, run by Jews, would autistically screech to high heaven about how racist and xenophobic that was.

GFY Schlomo.

You created this golem.

I'm not allowing you to shred the bill of rights in a vain attempt to slay it.

You deal with it asshole.
 
Last edited:
But if any "ethnic white" nation were to announce that they had a right to self determination, the MMOs, run by Jews, would autistically screech to high heaven about how racist and xenophobic that was.

GFY Schlomo.

You created this golem.

I'm not allowing you to shred the bill of rights in a vain attempt to slay it.

You deal with it asshole.

https://twitter.com/NatCon2022/status/1786034598918402283

 
So I agree with both Soros paid leftists AND Marjorie Taylor Green that a bill just passed by the GOP is unconstitutional. We are living in some strange times.
 
Back
Top