- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,466
Massie casts the only "no" vote against "Anti-Zionism = Antisemitism" resolution
They're at it again:
Even though H.R. 6090 "only" applies to educational institutions and programs that receive federal funding, I believe it is none the less both an offense to the First Amendment, and non-legally binding, because federal agencies have no right to restrict free speech, and the IHRA's own definition is a "working" definition, and "non-legally binding".*
The list of instances in which "antisemitism" is workingly defined by them is rather long and all-encompassing.*
Here is the Bill that Passed the House:*
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text
Here is the definition:*
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
Even though H.R. 6090 "only" applies to educational institutions and programs that receive federal funding, I believe it is none the less both an offense to the First Amendment, and non-legally binding, because federal agencies have no right to restrict free speech, and the IHRA's own definition is a "working" definition, and "non-legally binding".*
The list of instances in which "antisemitism" is workingly defined by them is rather long and all-encompassing.*
Here is the Bill that Passed the House:*
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text
Here is the definition:*
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
And the sponsor isn't even a Dispensationalist or a Jew. He's Catholic.
He's from New York City. But, here's how the House works with these things. They distribute the sponsorships for political reasons,
they are like trophies. There are 61 other co-sponsors. Meaning, 62 Congresspeople wanted to make damn sure their names were on that list. There's horse trading. It's a feather in the cap, how the machine works. All other 61 sponsors are equally involved.
This was just ONE of many "antisemitism" bills with various "sponsors" by this current House.
It just happened to be the one they voted on.
see them all: https://www.congress.gov/search?q={"source":"all","congress":"118","search":"Antisemitism"}
Like Seth Magaziner. You know he backs this but "did not vote" to appear like there's some kind of conflict of interest.
Sometimes they don't vote at all when they don't want to show their hands, and know the result is already affirmed.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
But if any "ethnic white" nation were to announce that they had a right to self determination, the MMOs, run by Jews, would autistically screech to high heaven about how racist and xenophobic that was.
GFY Schlomo.
You created this golem.
I'm not allowing you to shred the bill of rights in a vain attempt to slay it.
You deal with it asshole.
So I agree with both Soros paid leftists AND Marjorie Taylor Green that a bill just passed by the GOP is unconstitutional. We are living in some strange times.