US goes to war with Iran



47 is obviously fake and is a remote-controlled DS puppet. As always, they are blundering fools doing Putin's heavy-lifting for him. They are the living embodiment of "All hat and no cattle" -- they are so addicted to the amphetamine of military action that they will gamble away every last square inch of their own estate in pursuit of just one last hit of the good stuff. So, our country is being parceled up and sold to the highest bidder for the military high of DC adrenaline junkies...

 
68586657655fd.webp

There was never any agreements that they can have highly enriched Uranium.

Even Iran said they had highly enriched Uranium "for leverage" ( meaning so they can threaten the west with nuclear weapons ).

Of course there is a different line we draw with Israel. Israel is our ally. Only Iran threatens us with nuclear weapons.
 
Last edited:
Dr. Braun, who wrote extensively about the Izraeli nuclear attack on Tartus Syria, is now stating that the US used a nuke on Iran.



 


US Media are currently busy producing extensive cover-up for the use of nukes on Iran's nuclear facilities (Fordow etc) by erroneously insinuating that consequential fallout will originate from stored nuclear materials.

However, stored nuclear materials only become strongly radioactive when irradiated with the fast neutrons of a nuclear weapon, much more so than after conventional strikes.

Same playbook of wrongly ascribing fallout to - in this case even nonexistent - pre-existing nuclear material was already applied in relation to the Tartus nuke on Dec 15, '24 in Tartus, Syria, whose existence is proven beyond the shadow of a doubt:
 
Romans 1:31 "They are senseless, faithless, heartless, merciless."

Truly, God is exposing the hypocrisy of this retarded country as this dotard gaslights us into another hot war in the Middle East.

You got this supposed sophist J.D. Vance making idiocracy talking points "we're at war with the nuclear program", and "the difference between Trump and former presidents is they were dumb and he's smart".....what can you say? I half expect the next insult to be "they talk like fags".

Then the unhinged rant against Massie...it's just an endless supply of the most juvenile immature rants. Ted Cruz fumbling around with the bible but can't make a coherent argument for why Israel should be worshipped.

It is truly a clown show. And as Christ said in Matt 24:39, "And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.", it's easy to see why they are oblivious. The end times brain is a state of inept potato heads to which thinking and reason is the language of people they hate. Not only do they sniff their own farts, they brag about how good it smells. They are the greatest farts.

 


US Media are currently busy producing extensive cover-up for the use of nukes on Iran's nuclear facilities (Fordow etc) by erroneously insinuating that consequential fallout will originate from stored nuclear materials.

However, stored nuclear materials only become strongly radioactive when irradiated with the fast neutrons of a nuclear weapon, much more so than after conventional strikes.

Same playbook of wrongly ascribing fallout to - in this case even nonexistent - pre-existing nuclear material was already applied in relation to the Tartus nuke on Dec 15, '24 in Tartus, Syria, whose existence is proven beyond the shadow of a doubt:


The countries in the region are saying there was no nuclear explosions.

A nuclear weapon even a small one would have been easily detected by the earthquake it produces.

Even the smallest nukes ever created have a kill radius larger than a square mile.

People would be dying in the streets from the neutrons.

Any atomic bomb smaller than a tactical nuke is considered a neutron bomb.

Thats because the high energy radiation is what kills you the buildings stay standing but the people die.
 
Last edited:


UN Secretary-General condemns US strike on Iran: "Dangerous escalation"

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the recent US military attack on Iran during a Security Council meeting, calling it a "dangerous escalation in a region already on the brink."

He warned that the world now risks falling into a "vicious cycle of revenge."

Guterres stressed that "there is no military solution" and that "diplomacy is the only way forward. The only hope is peace."

He also called for an immediate cessation of hostilities and a return to substantive negotiations on Iran's nuclear program
 
Putin says they wont assist Iran in war against Israel "2 million Israeli people speak Russian"

 
Well, China is about to do exactly that. Exactly that.

And why is China doing this? Because China has had enough of the Rothschilds banks toppling countries that refuse to let them run their central banks.

It'll be dumb if they do but sure ok.

Iran wasn't pursuing nukes. It never mattered what they complied with -- and, yes, they damned well have complied. This country has been complying for thirty years, even as administration after administration has sabre-rattled and told lies about it.

Well, they should have complied harder. Full access to nuclear documents and facilities is not a very big thing to ask, and Iran consistently failed to do that. Even when they were "complying".

China is giving them nukes. Now will you accept reality? You said you would.

Yea. It's dumb but if they do it that they don't leave us much choice.
 
Well as of yesterday, there's one less country with the capability to build nuclear weapons
That's what we're being told, and maybe it's true. But even if so, that's one of a number of results that came out of yesterday's events. Another result is that Iran and other countries have a heightened incentive to hurry up and acquire nuclear weapons, because once a nation has them, it tends to get taken more seriously, and not attacked by the US.

And yesterday's attack of Iran can't be isolated from the rest of history either. It seems to me that the net effect the federal government of the US has had on the world since the advent of nuclear weapons, has been to contribute enormously to their proliferation both inside and outside the US. And we shouldn't neglect the question of why Iran is hostile to the US in the first place. I bet that Switzerland isn't worried about being nuked by Iran.

If the US wants to lead the way to a world that is much less likely to suffer enormous losses due to nuclear weapons, it can start by greatly reducing its own arsenal, and attaining a level of moral legitimacy when it tries to convince other countries they don't need them. And it can follow that up by not habitually ruining other countries and making enemies around the world.
 
That's what we're being told, and maybe it's true. But even if so, that's one of a number of results that came out of yesterday's events. Another result is that Iran and other countries have a heightened incentive to hurry up and acquire nuclear weapons, because once a nation has them, it tends to get taken more seriously, and not attacked by the US.

And yesterday's attack of Iran can't be isolated from the rest of history either. It seems to me that the net effect the federal government of the US has had on the world since the advent of nuclear weapons, has been to contribute enormously to their proliferation both inside and outside the US.

If the US wants to lead the way to a world that is much less likely to suffer enormous losses due to nuclear weapons, it can start by greatly reducing its own arsenal, and attaining a level of moral legitimacy when it tries to convince other countries they don't need them.
Incentive to get nuclear weapons?

No that's just fake news.

We just demonstrated why its stupid to pursue nuclear weapons.

Anybody with a functional brain understands thats what we demonstrated.
 
Incentive to get nuclear weapons?

No that's just fake news.

We just demonstrated why its stupid to pursue nuclear weapons.

Anybody with a functional brain understands thats what we demonstrated.
Let's see if Pakistan draws the conclusion that now they better get rid of their nukes.

Let's also ask Ukraine if they're glad they got rid of their nukes in the 90s.
 
If the US wants to lead the way to a world that is much less likely to suffer enormous losses due to nuclear weapons, it can start by greatly reducing its own arsenal, and attaining a level of moral legitimacy when it tries to convince other countries they don't need them. And it can follow that up by not habitually ruining other countries and making enemies around the world.
100%
 
That's code for, "China's got this."
Maybe if it was 2010 still

China and Russia dont want Iran to get nukes only Iran wants that.

Iran has missles that can hit Moscow and China.

Russia doesn't even want that. Neither does China.
 
Let's see if Pakistan draws the conclusion that now they better get rid of their nukes.

Let's also ask Ukraine if they're glad they got rid of their nukes in the 90s.
Ukraine wouldnt exist if they still had their nukes.

The only people that had the launch keys to Ukraines SATAN nukes was in Russia.

Russia made them hand them over and the west made them an offer they couldn't refuse not to develop their own nuclear weapons.
 
China and Russia dont want Iran to get nukes only Iran wants that.

Yep. People here seem to want to fantasize about that but that's not gonna happen.

Iran was fucking around with its IAEA obligations and Russia and China know that Iran was fucking around with its IAEA obligations.

They recognize a FAFO situation when they see it.
 
Back
Top