SpiritOf1776_J4
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,378
I already answered that. That is in the (different) kind of detention for 1032. In 1031 the detention for SUSPECTED 'CONNECTIONS' with something deemed privately to be a 'supporting organization' of bad groups, without trial, indefinitely 'for the duration of the war' (what, on terror?) does NOT have that language. Note that language says 'UNDER THIS SECTION' and applies to section 1032 not 1031.
In section 1031 - which fyi is not on the title page, you have to search for it, its worse.
It only exludes American citizens with all the loopholes mentioned by sailingaway, and then for activities *within* the United States.
This means that if you call someone overseas, and you play the game of associated with someone who is associated with someone whose grandmother has a friend of someone who is suspect, you could be hauled away. Calls and internet messages overseas are outside the territory.
Consider the NSA that wiretaps all calls without warrants, and the recent defense department desire to use drone strikes on those suspected of "cyber" terrorism. Virtually everything online can be considered outside the United States. The military is already interpreting things this way.
But you say that a court of law would never agree with the military? If you are taken away this way, you will never see a court to raise that objection.
Last edited: