[Unverified] National Enquirer Runs Story of Multiple Ted Cruz Affairs

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 7h7 hours ago
Ann Coulter Retweeted The Majority Awakens
So far, I don't even believe Cruz sex scandal, but it's amazing how it's somehow become a story about Trump.
 
This sounds serious:
Washington Times is apparently causing trouble for Drew Johnson tweeting what he did about the Cruz
scandal from the National Enquirer:

Drew Johnson &#8207 [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views 3 hours ago
Interesting to learn I wasn't a Washington Times columnist, since I've received money in exchange for writing columns for quite a while.
---
The Washington Times ‏@WashTimes 4 hours ago
To all who point out the Internet is forever, we get it. Hence Drew was able to perpetuate his employment when it ended long ago.

The Washington Times ‏@WashTimes 4 hours ago
Drew Johnson parted from @WashTimes over a year ago. We take umbrage with him linking to an old bio page claiming to represent us.

---
They removed the search link to his name so his articles pop up automatically - which I just used a day ago, and bio apparently, but you can still manually search for them.
ie washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson was removed.

The newest articles I found were dated in the last weeks, and there were so many of them, I'm not sure what his newest was:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/4/drew-johnson-al-gores-new-inconvenient-truth/[/url]

So it isn't true Drew hasn't written articles for them in over a year!??!

Ok, scrolling down further, I see some earlier statements from Washington Times, which they seem to later feel the need to explain why he has a bio (above, I'm scrolling backwards in time):

The Washington Times ‏@WashTimes 14h14 hours ago
Drew Johnson [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views is NOT a columnist @WashTimes. (1/3)

He is a former employee who occasionally wrote for our "citizen-journalist" portal known as Communities. (2/3)

That relationship has ended as of today. (3/3)

Drew Johnson's [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views personal views do not reflect those of the @WashTimes.

- - -

I'm not sure why the Washington Times cares that Drew tweeted a personal message on his own private twitter
if it really is his own opinion. He never represented it as anything but his own. Everyone knew he wrote articles in the Washington
Times, but his twitter page wasn't an official twitter page, nor did I think so looking at it.

The original tweet:

Drew Johnson &#8207 [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views Mar 24
COMING CLEAN: From what I know, at least 2 of the women named as Cruz mistresses by the National Enquirer are accurate
#TRUMP #CRUZ #TCOT
 
Last edited:
CeZWXG4VAAEdj1_.jpg


CebTIwQUAAAR5x7.jpg:large


Baring shoulder in both pictures note.
 
Last edited:
Bushy &#8206 [MENTION=41375]mag[/MENTION]Amerchant [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views So reporters knew but said nothing? #CruzSexScandal @realDonaldTrump [MENTION=37245]camp[/MENTION]aign_Trump

Drew Johnson &#8206 [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views [MENTION=41375]mag[/MENTION]Amerchant @realDonaldTrump [MENTION=37245]camp[/MENTION]aign_Trump Lots heard rumors. An online media outlet new the whole story but they chose not to run w/it.
1:14 AM - 25 Mar 2016

Drew Johnson &#8206 [MENTION=18777]Drew[/MENTION]s_Views
@obama_speech Not a reporter.Just a columnist.This has nothing to do with the Times.Another outlet has the details.it's their story to tell.
1:26 AM - 25 Mar 2016
 
lol Ted Cruz is so finished with that sex scandal if its actually true.

More like Trump might be in trouble if he had anything to do with making it up. Then again, the idiots that vote for Trump will probably justify it or not care.
 
How many folks now wish they would have supported Rand? I have a feeling that this story is real and have always thought that Cruz wasn't what he claimed. My how ignorant the electorate is. If the story is indeed true, I just pray that the Cruz kids and his wife will be all right. What a freakin' mess.
 
Bushy &#8206 @magAmerchant @Drews_Views So reporters knew but said nothing? #CruzSexScandal @realDonaldTrump @campaign_Trump

Drew Johnson &#8206 @Drews_Views @magAmerchant @realDonaldTrump @campaign_Trump Lots heard rumors. An online media outlet new the whole story but they chose not to run w/it.
1:14 AM - 25 Mar 2016

Drew Johnson &#8206 @Drews_Views
@obama_speech Not a reporter.Just a columnist.This has nothing to do with the Times.Another outlet has the details.it's their story to tell.
1:26 AM - 25 Mar 2016

DJ is/was WT writer:

[h=1]Obama should support rescinding oil-export ban[/h]
By Drew Johnson - - Wednesday, November 25, 2015
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/25/drew-johnson-obama-should-support-rescinding-oil-e/


WT's quick reaction is interesting.
 
All they did was google "hot, GOP, women, TX" and "hot, beltway, gop, women" & made up a story about Cruz.



The Sabotage Trump people invited this story that was already out.

This was good timing for the story to come out with the infighting.

Of course Mr Pecker loves Trump, he's going to call out confirmed sex addict Bill Clinton on his problems.

Every serious tabloid or trash magazine wants Trump to run attacks against Bill Clinton.

Cruz & the pro-Cruz blogger women should have all denied outright straight away everything.

Instead one of them, Amanda Carpenter said:"Speak to my lawyer, ... it is categorically false accusation".

Trump would have said:"Im going to sue them and steal their money", which actually sounds non-evasive compared to the lawyer talk.
 
Last edited:
All they did was google "hot, GOP, women, TX" and "hot, beltway, gop, women" & made up a story about Cruz.

The $500,000 from Cruz' PAC to 'Carly For President' campaign is definitely real and
the FEC is investigating that "Other Disbursement"/hush money payment.

A video reviewed by Breitbart shows "a compilation video of Cruz and woman other than his wife
coming out of the Capital Grille restaurant and a hotel on Tuesdays and Thursdays"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lse-claim-one-five-women-affair-Ted-Cruz.html


.

 
Last edited:
Damn why didn't this $#@! happen right before Iowa? Rand could've been the Anti-Trump.

It's a nice thought, but if you really believe that you haven't been paying attention. They are going to brush him aside no matter what.
 


 
One thing about it, this scandal will prove once and for all if Ted Cruz is really anti-establishment. If he is he will do jail time for using campaign contributions for hush money.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-national-enquirer_us_56f6a613e4b0a372181a17fa

The ‘Massive Game Of Telephone’ That Preceded The Ted Cruz Tabloid Rumors

NEW YORK — Rick Wilson got a call earlier this month from a reporter asking about a potentially explosive, campaign-ending piece of opposition research: a Ted Cruz sex tape.

Wilson is the type of plugged-in Republican consultant who reporters would expect to know if such a bombshell exists — and perhaps even when a campaign was ready to drop it. This time, he had no idea. But at the reporter’s request, Wilson contacted a journalist friend at a TV network to see if they’d had it. The TV journalist didn’t have the goods, but had heard another network did.

“This became a massive game of telephone,” said Wilson, who recalled fielding calls from upwards of 20 journalists in one day, hailing from .....

Much more history and details / timelines of scandal including "the thing".
 
Back
Top