United States v. Lopez

Why was the GFSZ act not repealed by this?

In theory this should prevent a national ban on CCW, but they will try anyway.
 
I have to concur

Indeed. It seems to me that this ruling would nullify both the National Firearms Act and the Gun Control Act. Although, of course, I am not nearly as knowledgeable in these areas as our esteemed legislature in washington. :rolleyes:
 
I posted the question on KSCCW to which someone responded with:

Subsequent to Lopez, the "new and somewhat improved" GFZA was passed with certain amendments that made a feeble attempt at recognizing States' rights. These amendments were put in place prior to most States having CCW and/or reciprocity with other States. I think some good arguments can be made that a permit recognized from another State is as good as a permit issued in that State, but I do not think this issue has yet been tested.

I do think that any attempt at nationwide restrictions on CCW would be met with a wall of State sovereignty suits.
 
Back
Top