UFOs 'tampered with nukes'

Arklatex said:
Do you understand why they don't just land and hold a press conference?

The answer is in the my posts- it's that law i mentioned. It's in the very fabric of your reality.

To do what they do in a mass campaign like this, which is give us hints that peace is the answer, they violate that rule to a degree because even this is a small free will violation - they receive permission.

This permission comes from a planet orbiting your sun and exists in a different density of light. To our eyes it appears as the rings of Saturn.

------------------

Many more than you probably imagine have seen their ships first hand. They appear to many on purpose, if you see one it's because they wanted to be seen. Now understand the massive mind control here, everyone is programmed to not believe these "crackpots"

------------------

These ships communicate with groups of people all over the planet in every language and offer their thoughts and philosophies.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1978/1978_1018.aspx

There is a much larger story here and you live in exciting times.
Click to expand...

Why can’t discussions about UFOs hardly ever remain intact without getting spammed with new-age crap? Could you go channel Elvis or something and let us have a rational conversation?
 
UFOs 'tampered with nukes'
----------------

How frustrating and embarrassing that must be for the military. It’s no wonder they been sitting on it for 60 years. But how exciting for us! It looks like we have an actual benefactor with the power to really see that we don’t exterminate ourselves (at least with nukes). Of course maybe they are keeping us alive for selfish reasons (fattening the herd or whatever).
 
Last edited:
idirtify said:
UFOs 'tampered with nukes'
----------------

How frustrating and embarrassing that must be for the military. It’s no wonder they been sitting on it for 60 years. But how exiting for us! It looks like we have an actual benefactor with the power to really see that we don’t exterminate ourselves (at least with nukes). Of course maybe they are keeping us alive for selfish reasons (fattening the herd or whatever).
Click to expand...

Yeah , we could just be natural resources to be harvested later . :)
 
oyarde said:
Yeah , we could just be natural resources to be harvested later . :)
Click to expand...

Of course their selfish reasons don’t necessarily have to be unfortunate for us. Often the superior species will accelerate the evolution/development of the inferior species. I mean we don’t really have to be chickens or cows or pigs; we could be dogs or cats or “pets”, or domesticated lab animals.
 
Last edited:
idirtify said:
Of course their selfish reasons don’t necessarily have to be unfortunate for us. Often the superior species will accelerate the evolution/development of the inferior species. I mean we don’t really have to be chickens or cows or pigs; we could be dogs or cats or “pets”, or domesticated lab animals.
Click to expand...
http://www.toem-wow.de/wp-content/u...les-group-gun-helmet-humor-macro-tactical.jpg

Okay Perry

YouTube - Porno For Pyros "Pets"

Perry is a whacked out morphine/heroine/barbiuate addict that copies other people and can't think for himself, yet thrusts himself in to the limelight with everything from manequine looking hermaphrodites with their heads on fire, to "Pets" being "our" TRUE masters.. That is a hard sell around here. Even to me. :D Good luck tho.
 
Last edited:
revolutionary8 said:
whatever you do, don't pretend this ridiculous idea is "original".
Click to expand...

“You talking to me? You talking to ME??”

How’s about telling me why you think I’m pretending anything? (I certainly never claimed or implied to be the originator of the “pet” idea.) Then, explain why you think the idea is ridiculous.
 
idirtify said:
“You talking to me? You talking to ME??”

How’s about telling me why you think I’m pretending anything? (I certainly never claimed or implied to be the originator of the “pet” idea.) Then, explain why you think the idea is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

True enough, you never claimed to be the originator, yet here you are, promoting the idea. I am a firm believer in conditioning tecniques, as I am sure you are, so I watch a lot of the "ideas" that get thrown out there. A lot of people repeat them w/o knowing what they are really repeating. Forget what I said, that your "pet" idea is "preposterous", state your case. I believe offense always goes first, as they "lost" the toss.
:D
 
Last edited:
Anyone else feel as if disclosure is coming soon. It would be an awfully convenient thing for the time of the economy and the state of the world..
 
Vessol said:
Anyone else feel as if disclosure is coming soon. It would be an awfully convenient thing for the time of the economy and the state of the world..
Click to expand...

Absolutely. I don't know if it will be bad, or good. After decades of believing this time will soon come, I now don't know if I want to see it actually happen.

Wesker1982 said:
He sent it to me today after I was talking to him about the Malmstrom incident being on the news
Click to expand...

Your grandfather's story is very interesting. Thanks again for sharing it here. If he ever feels like discussing it further, I'm sure it would be welcomed by a number of groups.
 
Since they might be leaking information they were sworn not to release, I wonder if the Air Force intends on prosecuting? If the Air Force does not try to prosecute, in an attempt to not comment on the event so as to not risk giving it further validation, it might give a false message that they won't prosecute over leaked information, which they are bound by law to do, and that could be seen as a weakness, as I am sure they do not want to give the impression that leaking information will go unpunished. If they do prosecute, they are indirectly admitting that it might be accurate information.

It seems these officers are trying to force the Air Force's hand on disclosure, because this could make the Air Force look like it has a weakness and perhaps appear deceptive to a degree if they both remain silent and do not prosecute, and if they prosecute without disclosure it would make them look bad for giving only an indirect admission of the truth without coming out and disclosing it, and if the Air Force discloses the information then they will look more strong willed and truthful to the American people.

It will be interesting to see the Air Force's reaction to this, though they could have reacted when these same officers leaked the same information years ago, but now the information is more widespread. Although, there's also the possibility that the Air Force told them to leak it (for whatever purpose they may have planned, good or bad), but even if that were the case, it would still be in their best interest to not remain silent for the same reasons listed above.

So, whatever the outcome, we should be expecting more ufo related public discussion in the near future. Whether disclosure will be merely given, or used for a purpose whether good or bad, is yet to be seen.
 
The thing that makes me nervous is how much the mainstream media is covering this now.
 
Vessol said:
The thing that makes me nervous is how much the mainstream media is covering this now.
Click to expand...
exactly,
granted "covering" is a "white-washy" type term. MSM doesn't "cover" the shit straight outta Shinola, let alone "UN space alien ambassadodoers "prepared" to "tea down" on possible "nuke tamperers"
dear gawd, define "truther" again?
 
Last edited:
Since some people are really into this. What alien race has ships that would look like a fireball.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Navy Pushing Billions for Sea-based Nukes that Nobody Seems to Want
Replies
3
Views
27
nikcers
nikcers
DamianTV
Russia and North Korea Announce Plan To Arm Iran With NUKES
2
Replies
31
Views
173
acptulsa
acptulsa
Swordsmyth
The Pentagon has halted shipments of some air defense missiles and other precision munitions to Ukraine
Replies
3
Views
30
unknown
unknown
PAF
Gabbard Falls in Line, Claims Iran Close to Nukes
Replies
11
Views
125
CCTelander
C
PAF
US Sent Israel Hundreds of Missiles Days Before Attack on Iran
Replies
1
Views
25
TheTexan
TheTexan
Back
Top