Gabbard Falls in Line, Claims Iran Close to Nukes

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,559
by Kyle Anzalone
Jun 20, 2025


America’s top intel chief appeared to walk back her stance on Iran’s nuclear program after being criticized by President Donald Trump


Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused the media of misrepresenting her statement in March that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. The shift followed attacks on America’s top intelligence official by President Donald Trump.

On Friday, Gabbard posted a clip of her March Senate testimony to X, claiming, “The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division.”





In the clip, Gabbard says that “the Intelligence Community continues to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and the Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized a nuclear weapons program.”

Gabbard’s remarks to the Senate have been presented by opponents of US military intervention in Iran to argue that the country’s nuclear program does not present a threat, as Tehran is not seeking nuclear weapons.

In recent days, it has become clear that President Trump and other top US officials do not agree with that assessment and believe Iran could develop a bomb within a few weeks. The assessment that Iran could have nuclear weapons in as little as 15 days appears to have originated with Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency.

Officials speaking with the New York Times said the Mossad findings may be a political effort to lure President Trump into supporting the offensive war Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched against Iran earlier this month.

Twice in the past week, Trump publicly criticized his top intelligence official over her March statement. When asked about the intelligence community assessment and Gabbard’s remarks on Friday, Trump said, “She’s wrong.”

NBC News reports that Gabbard has been sidelined in the White House debate on Iran. In her X post, the intelligence chief appeared to attempt to align her view with the president’s. “Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,” she wrote. “President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”

Many users on X are comparing Gabbard’s post to former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s 2003 address to the UN Security Council. During the speech, Powell infamously presented false information that hardened beliefs among Americans that Iraq was seeking weapons of mass destruction, and that dictator Saddam Hussein had ties to al-Qaeda.






 
At least she's not lying. Weeks and months aren't exactly in short supply.
 
Wow, Tulsi is now the Colin Powell of this administration. She knows better but has chosen to lie through her teeth to sell a war. She’s worse than the others because she spent her career pretending to be against regime change war in Iran. What an utter disgrace!
Gee, I wonder what the sure fire test is for detecting when a politician is lying?

The people cheering this on profess to be ushering in decent human beings who are fit to rule us all (though, naively, their words come across as, "administering the system by which..."). You know, benign and wise power elites who would never, ever abuse their vast power and access to wealth. Now what would the reality check on that be?
 
Last edited:
Tulsi has a bit of yellowcake around her mouth.

She didn't get that round mouth from eating square meals.....
 
by Kyle Anzalone
Jun 20, 2025


America’s top intel chief appeared to walk back her stance on Iran’s nuclear program after being criticized by President Donald Trump


Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused the media of misrepresenting her statement in March that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon. The shift followed attacks on America’s top intelligence official by President Donald Trump.

On Friday, Gabbard posted a clip of her March Senate testimony to X, claiming, “The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division.”





In the clip, Gabbard says that “the Intelligence Community continues to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and the Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized a nuclear weapons program.”

Gabbard’s remarks to the Senate have been presented by opponents of US military intervention in Iran to argue that the country’s nuclear program does not present a threat, as Tehran is not seeking nuclear weapons.

In recent days, it has become clear that President Trump and other top US officials do not agree with that assessment and believe Iran could develop a bomb within a few weeks. The assessment that Iran could have nuclear weapons in as little as 15 days appears to have originated with Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency.

Officials speaking with the New York Times said the Mossad findings may be a political effort to lure President Trump into supporting the offensive war Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched against Iran earlier this month.

Twice in the past week, Trump publicly criticized his top intelligence official over her March statement. When asked about the intelligence community assessment and Gabbard’s remarks on Friday, Trump said, “She’s wrong.”

NBC News reports that Gabbard has been sidelined in the White House debate on Iran. In her X post, the intelligence chief appeared to attempt to align her view with the president’s. “Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,” she wrote. “President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”

Many users on X are comparing Gabbard’s post to former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s 2003 address to the UN Security Council. During the speech, Powell infamously presented false information that hardened beliefs among Americans that Iraq was seeking weapons of mass destruction, and that dictator Saddam Hussein had ties to al-Qaeda.







Damn. I wonder who threatened her family?

Watch this entire video:

 
Gee, I wonder what the sure fire test is for detecting when a politician is lying?
Their lips are moving?
The people cheering this on profess to be ushering in decent human beings who are fit to rule us all (though, naively, their words come across as, "administering the system by which..."). You know, benign and wise power elites who would never, ever abuse their vast power and access to wealth. Now what would the reality check on that be?

.

But we have to empower a parasitic ruling class to rod from us, and to beat, aze, kidnap and murder us in order to protect us from people who might rob from, beat, taze, kidnap and/or murder us.

Hey, wait…
 
Back
Top