UC Berkeley cancels Milo Yiannopoulos event amid violent protest (RIOT) - 2/1 - LIVE

16299064_1859786710901576_1449909062901421575_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
2:55 the reporter said UC Berkley gets 4 billion dollars of fed money annually!

That's 4-$#@!ing-billion!

You still have to understand that the FEDs are getting something valuable to them for their money. Some of the more advanced technologies the US uses to dominate is not researched in some University in the Stix, a lot of them come from the University of California school systems.

Also, one can tell who the parasite in the relation is by the party that blinks first. The FEDs know this which is why they would not pull any funds from the school system. I hope I am wrong on this.

Edit: Touche
 
Last edited:
You still have to understand that the FEDs are getting something valuable to them for their money. Some of the moved advanced technologies the US uses to dominate is not researched in some University in the Stix, a lot of them come from the University of California school systems.

Also, one can tell who the parasite in the relation is by the party that blinks first. The FEDs know this which is why they would not pull any funds from the school system. I hope I am wrong on this.

Lastly, the University of California school system has 240k students in it not 40k and half of that money is used for research, so its $2 billion divided by 240k people which gives you about $9k per student in what I assume to be a mix of federal student loans and pell grants.

Fixed my post.

A simple google search doesn't net readily discernible figures about Berkeley's finances only that they have 38,000 students in 2015
 
One cutting funding will only hurt parasites.

Two its not a myth and majority of students in the system right now getting shit useless degrees.

Three Milo is awesome and right.

Four violence is on the left. They own it and will get handled properly.

Every argument I heard in this thread to the contrary is biased opinion.
 
Personally I'm for cutting all federal funding of education, every dime!

Eliminate the DOE and everything associated with it.

No fed money for "research" either.

Then cut taxes proportionately for people who work in the private sector but not for government employees.
 
Personally I'm for cutting all federal funding of education, every dime!

Eliminate the DOE and everything associated with it.

No fed money for "research" either.

Then cut taxes proportionately for people who work in the private sector but not for government employees.

To your keyboard to Donald Trump's ears. The best way to cut funding to states is if it is accompanied by an eqivalent federal tax cuts. But the feds need the ability to dole out funds because it's a way to lord over the states. They lose all leverage when that ability is gone.

So for that reason, they would keep collecting all the state money they can get away with and redistributing it back to the states. They benefit more from the system we have now.
 
We're not defending what he is. We're defending his right to say any damned thing he wants to say.

Yes, this.

I find both his tendency to mouth off about about his sexual exploits and the exploits themselves repugnant.

Nevertheless he has all the right in the world to express them and his political views, especially when invited and paid to do so.

Same goes for any of these wretched leftists.

I only post some of their more outrageous statements not as a call to have them shut up by agents of government, but to make people aware of what they think of us.
 
Personally I'm for cutting all federal funding of education, every dime!

Eliminate the DOE and everything associated with it.

No fed money for "research" either.

Then cut taxes proportionately for people who work in the private sector but not for government employees.

Fuck research. What has our "research" uncovered lately, say the last 10 years? People like to post on FB? :cool:
 
Fuck research. What has our "research" uncovered lately, say the last 10 years? People like to post on FB? :cool:

Think how much research could be done if productive businesses could afford to fund what was profitable...

Instead they're stuck paying the feds so Mallard Duck orgasms can be cataloged and cross referenced..

Oh! Don't forget "feelings" and all the associated grant money...:rolleyes:
 
Think how much research could be done if productive businesses could afford to fund what was profitable...

Instead they're stuck paying the feds so Mallard Duck orgasms can be cataloged and cross referenced..

Oh! Don't forget "feelings" and all the associated grant money...:rolleyes:

This is like the Middle Ages. The time of ignorance and superstition. The FEDs control all the funding and give it to the biggest trolls who would push their agenda. Elon Musk! :cool:

I hope we will live in the enlightenment era one day.
 
Here is a possible recruitment marketing clip for the intellectual quality of an NYU professor:

 
This has nothing to do with free speech.

Milo's nazis care as much about free speech as Berkeley's bolsheviks.

All talk to the contrary from the nazi side is just rhetoric to gain a tactical advantage in their street fight with their twins.

Generating headlines like this is the entire purpose of Milo's existence.

Fuck 'em all.
 
That's not an argument. It's also ridiculous.

The movement which Milo represents is based in nationalism and anti-capitalism: it's really driven by nationalism, with the anti-capitalism just being the default position in our society in general. At its extreme, you have actual card-carrying neo-NAZIs. Most aren't that hardcore, of course, but it's just a matter of degree (maybe they just want to sterilize and/or deport 'the unfit' rather than exterminate them). Likewise on the other side. Some are actual, card-carrying communists; most adhere to some more moderate form of proletarian socialism (maybe just stifle the kulaks rather than murder them).

Anyway, point is, they're all garbage, and it's bizarre to see libertarians cheer when one scores a point against the other.

...which, I reiterate, is all this episode was: point nazis.
 
Last edited:
The movement which Milo represents is based in nationalism and anti-capitalism: it's really driven by nationalism, with the anti-capitalism just being the default position in our society in general. At its extreme, you have actual card-carrying neo-NAZIs. Most aren't that hardcore, of course, but it's just a matter of degree (maybe they just want to sterilize and/or deport 'the unfit' rather than exterminate them). Likewise on the other side. Some are actual, card-carrying communists; most adhere to some more moderate form of proletarian socialism (maybe just stifle the kulaks rather than murder them).

Anyway, point is, they're all garbage, and it's bizarre to see libertarians cheer when one scores a point against the other.

...which, I reiterate, is all this episode was: point nazis.

That's not an argument. It's also ridiculous.
 
Back
Top