UC Berkeley cancels Milo Yiannopoulos event amid violent protest (RIOT) - 2/1 - LIVE

[dannno]

The real truth comes at 1:45 in that clip. (the only part that matters)

Read my posts earlier in this thread for more context. It wasn't a protest. It wasn't even a riot. It was a fund-raising set up and this thread is playing right into it. Sad.

I've been trying to reconcile this the last few days because I know this group has a history of being connected with fed agents as well as being protected by police and here is what I came up with... first of all, Trump admin is definitely not behind this, I don't buy it for a minute. More likely the group is connected with Soros or similar, and they were able to have cooperation with local police and whatnot in past events like WTO protests. When the elite are running these groups and the elite have a puppet in office, it's easy to just lump them all in with "the government", but now that Trump is in office things are a little different.

In one of these two interviews, this girl who was pepper sprayed by a female black bloc rioter in a mask explains that she knew that particular group was going to be in attendance because they had a facebook event and she said that she thought about 300 black bloc protesters attended and most of them had actually SIGNED UP ON FACEBOOK TO ATTEND THE EVENT!! So even though this group is sponsored by the elites, they actually had a lot of people volunteer to tag along, so it's not like most of the time when half the black bloc are fed agents.. these were mostly volunteers working with possibly a few agents.

Lastly, many of the "peaceful protesters" who were not wearing black were cheering on the black bloc protesters violent actions of shutting down the event and running off the Milo supporters and worse.

I agree the WTO protests were mostly peaceful protesters, and they had a few people come in and ruin it, who were then protected by police and then peaceful protesters were attacked - but this is a COMPLETELY different scenario even though some of the players are similar.





She said she disagreed with the official figures, which were about 1,200 "peaceful protesters" and 120 or 150 "black bloc". She said it was more like 800 total, and almost 300 of them were black bloc. This changes the narrative pretty significantly.

Also of interest, I have no way of knowing for certain, but I think there is a small chance I may be acquainted with the black bloc pepper sprayer/girl who broke the front window of the building in the videos.

 

[juleswin]

Lastly, many of the "peaceful protesters" who were not wearing black were cheering on the black bloc protesters violent actions of shutting down the event and running off the Milo supporters and worse.

I agree the WTO protests were mostly peaceful protesters, and they had a few people come in and ruin it, who were then protected by police and then peaceful protesters were attacked - but this is a COMPLETELY different scenario even though some of the players are similar.

The same black bloc group came in with violence for the two events but only one had "peaceful protesters" the good one had peaceful protesters who were not cheering for the black bloc people.

Does this idea put forward by the poster make any sense to anyone who has not been permanently disfigured by the Stefan Molyenux ideology?

 

[AZJoe]

The real truth comes at 1:45 in that clip. (the only part that matters)

Read my posts earlier in this thread for more context. It wasn't a protest. It wasn't even a riot. It was a fund-raising set up and this thread is playing right into it. Sad.

So you're asserting that UC Berkeley is creating all the violent assaults, violence, damage, silencing so they can fund raise. Interesting conspiracy theory, and not a very bright plan by Berkeley. If so, then UC Berkeley and the members of the Board of Regents should certainly be liable, and held accountable.
But the individual criminal assailants are still also responsible for their own criminal violence.

 

[CaptUSA]

You see a conspiracy at every corner. Usualy when it has to do with right being right.

I've been trying to reconcile this the last few days... <blah, blah, bunch of irrelevant words...>

Is this what Trump has done to you?! You aren't even able to follow the simplest thought if you think it might contradict some Trump talking point?! (FYI, it doesn't, BTW)

Allow me to make it crystal clear. Berkeley has an alumni association that is responsible for getting their alumni to donate>They have a fundraising strategy that involves inviting controversial speakers to speak on their campus>They encourage their faculty and students to get riled up about "speaker X">The students predictably act out>The event captures national headlines>The calls go out to the alumni>the donations roll in.

It is part of their fundraising strategy - no conspiracy theories involved. I posted this was part of the strategy (from a known source) and then the clip showed a tweet that the alumni calls were going out. Not only did the Chancellor approve the invite, but he also sent out a campus-wide letter ahead of the planned event to denounce the speaker and encourage protests.

Now, did this one get out of hand? Yeah, probably - but it still served its purpose.

 

[dannno]

The same black bloc group came in with violence for the two events but only one had "peaceful protesters" the good one had peaceful protesters who were not cheering for the black bloc people.

Does this idea put forward by the poster make any sense to anyone who has not been permanently disfigured by the Stefan Molyenux ideology?

What the fuck are you talking about? This is based on witness observation as well as video footage of both events..

The WTO protesters were horrified that black bloc came out and started doing all that property damage, it was recorded in many of the videos and witness testimony. I didn't see any individuals that cheered them on let-alone whole sections of a crowd... There were only a couple dozen or so black bloc at WTO with over 10k peaceful protesters. This was a situation where literally a few people (1% or less) ruined it for everyone, but black bloc was being protected by police and the peaceful protesters got attacked by police.

At Berkeley, not only was the black bloc A MUCH BIGGER number of people (10 to 20 times bigger, at around 200-300), WITH MUCH MORE VOLUNTEERS (probably 90-98 volunteers compared to probably 50% volunteers at WTO), in a MUCH higher percentage of the whole group (black bloc was about 1% of WTO protesters and they were about 30% of the Berkeley protesters) and even then many of the 'peaceful protesters' were cheering on the black bloc rioters..

If you can prove me wrong with facts, reason or evidence go ahead but you aren't going to be able to. You could learn a lot from Stef if you would apply yourself.

___

On another note, that argument you were having earlier about the demographics of the riot vs. the demographics of Berkeley, you were wrong about that as well. In this video, Molyneux interviews a guy who lives in Berkeley and says that the school is about 40% asian. Stef asked him percentage of the rioters and protesters were asian, and he said it was much lower - Stef said he could have predicted that - a few of us predicted that, and for some bizarre reason you took the opposite stance. Maybe you can explain your reasoning, but it won't make any sense.

 

[dannno]

Is this what Trump has done to you?! You aren't even able to follow the simplest thought if you think it might contradict some Trump talking point?! (FYI, it doesn't, BTW)

Allow me to make it crystal clear. Berkeley has an alumni association that is responsible for getting their alumni to donate>They have a fundraising strategy that involves inviting controversial speakers to speak on their campus>They encourage their faculty and students to get riled up about "speaker X">The students predictably act out>The event captures national headlines>The calls go out to the alumni>the donations roll in.

It is part of their fundraising strategy - no conspiracy theories involved. I posted this was part of the strategy (from a known source) and then the clip showed a tweet that the alumni calls were going out. Not only did the Chancellor approve the invite, but he also sent out a campus-wide letter ahead of the planned event to denounce the speaker and encourage protests.

Now, did this one get out of hand? Yeah, probably - but it still served its purpose.

Huh? How does what you just posted contradict anything I said?

Of course Berkeley helped rile up their students, that is why black bloc had so many volunteers this time. Milo himself talked about how they were riling up the students, and all of the interviews and videos I have posted on the subject said they were riling up their students.

Go back and read my post - what I was trying to reconcile was whether we can blame the left and the media for this event, or whether it was just a few govt. paid agents that went in and ruined it for everyone else like at WTO. Because that is usually how the thinking goes - you have a peaceful protest and black bloc comes in, which is very small and has few volunteers and are mostly agents start violence so the police can crack down on the peaceful protesters.. So I was trying to reconcile that narrative with this event. There is a huge difference because like you said most of the people out there were actually voluntarily out there because the University was encouraging in and a bunch of them signed up to be in the black bloc group through a facebook event..

Then on top of that the crowd was largely supporting black bloc and cheering them on.

I just don't want to minimize it like you are and try to insinuate that this was some how just a few agents ruining things for everyone when in fact it was actually a large group of volunteers that were recruited, and much the left continues to give tacit support to the violence.

The media has encouraged it by painting Trump as Hitler and Milo a white nationalist, and so the rioters think they are justified in using violence against these 'nazis'.

 

[silverhandorder]

Danno ftw.

Also at this point everyone stopped reading.

 

[anaconda]

He debunks the gender wage gap and talks about how much feminism is hurting everybody.

Thems fightin' words!

 

[DisneyFan]

I pre-ordered Milo's book back when it was first announced and the SJWs and other leftist critics were threatening boycotts of anything the publisher put out unless they canceled it. Now that this act of terrorism has occurred I've decided to purchase additional copies for some friends.

I don't agree with Milo on everything, but someone has to stand up to these lunatics on university campuses (the students and professors) and in the larger world in general. These freaks have created an entire fantasy world full of nonsense like microaggressions, rape culture, whites=devils, etc. They are as free as anyone to believe in their myths, but they insist on silencing others and trying to force (not just convince) others to believe as they do. They work hard on Twitter to get people fired for saying the wrong thing. They support using the state to go after 90-year-old grandmothers for refusing to bake a cake. They support hate speech legislation. They back discrimination against whites and Asian Americans in hiring, admissions, and other things. They want to force you to say that trans women are real women. And the list goes on forever...

 

[seapilot]

A lot of the same people from Occupy movement are probably protesting now. They were around always protesting something even if they did not know why, only now they have something to focus (the POTUS)on. Video is from 2011.

 

[A. Havnes]

He also states in one of his talks that he loves women, but hates feminists. Should get your $#@! clear.

Which is why he says women have low IQs, stereotypes people to hell (definitely not Libertarian), etc. Yeah, he sure loves women, so long as they stay in the kitchen and don't open their mouths. The second they do, they're a feminist, and it's driving him to be gay.

 

[A. Havnes]

I pre-ordered Milo's book back when it was first announced and the SJWs and other leftist critics were threatening boycotts of anything the publisher put out unless they canceled it. Now that this act of terrorism has occurred I've decided to purchase additional copies for some friends.

I don't agree with Milo on everything, but someone has to stand up to these lunatics on university campuses (the students and professors) and in the larger world in general. These freaks have created an entire fantasy world full of nonsense like microaggressions, rape culture, whites=devils, etc. They are as free as anyone to believe in their myths, but they insist on silencing others and trying to force (not just convince) others to believe as they do. They work hard on Twitter to get people fired for saying the wrong thing. They support using the state to go after 90-year-old grandmothers for refusing to bake a cake. They support hate speech legislation. They back discrimination against whites and Asian Americans in hiring, admissions, and other things. They want to force you to say that trans women are real women. And the list goes on forever...

For a bunch of "progressives" it seems their fantasy society is one based on the Puritans, where shame is the ultimate punishment, and you'll walk around for the rest of your life with a scarlet letter for whatever aggression you happen to commit, no matter how egregious or harmless.

 

[dannno]

Which is why he says women have low IQs, stereotypes people to hell (definitely not Libertarian), etc. Yeah, he sure loves women, so long as they stay in the kitchen and don't open their mouths. The second they do, they're a feminist, and it's driving him to be gay.

He didn't say women have low IQs, they actually have slightly higher IQs on average than men. However there are less women with IQ over 120 than men, because the bell curve for IQ is much wider for men than women.. So there are a lot more men with higher IQs, and a lot more men with lower IQs, women tend to hover around the middle more. That's why you have a lot of homeless men, and men going to space and shit.

It's not about stereotypes, it's about data and facts.

And another thing.. Milo likes having sex with men. He is gay, ok? It's not just that women drive him away, he actually likes having sex with men. Straight men who MGTOW play video games and jack off to women or find one for the occasional hookup.

 

[MallsRGood]

nationalism, yes. Anti-capitalism, not even. You have no idea what you are talking about. You are making things up. Find me one milo "anti-capitalist" speech.

I have a much better understanding of the movement you're trailing than you do.

...you might want to reevaluate your allegiances.

 

[UWDude]

Find me one milo "anti-capitalist" speech.

I have a much better understanding of the movement you're trailing than you do.

...you might want to reevaluate your allegiances.

Im sorry, that is not an anti-capitalist Milo speech. That is a picture form decades before Milo was born. Please try again.

 

[MallsRGood]

Im sorry, that is not an anti-capitalist Milo speech. That is a picture form decades before Milo was born. Please try again.

Go to therightstuff(dot)biz (the most popular alt-right site on the web, now)

There are two possibilities:

(a) You aren't aware of the overt neo-NAZI character of this site,

or, (b) you are aware, approve, and are thereby a NAZI

In either case, I would advise self-castration, for the good of the gene pool.

 

[UWDude]

Find me one milo "anti-capitalist" speech.

Go to therightstuff(dot)biz (the most popular alt-right site on the web, now)

There are two possibilities:

(a) You aren't aware of the overt neo-NAZI character of this site,

or, (b) you are aware, approve, and are thereby a NAZI

In either case, I would advise self-castration, for the good of the gene pool.

I'm sorry, that is not an anti-capitalist Milo speech. Please try again.

 

[timosman]

Go to therightstuff(dot)biz (the most popular alt-right site on the web, now)

There are two possibilities:

(a) You aren't aware of the overt neo-NAZI character of this site,

or, (b) you are aware, approve, and are thereby a NAZI

In either case, I would advise self-castration, for the good of the gene pool.

Ladies first!

 

[MallsRGood]

I'm sorry, that is not an anti-capitalist Milo speech. Please try again.

OKay..

What's the problem?

 

[UWDude]

OKay..

What's the problem?

I'm sorry, that is not an anti-capitalist Milo speech. Please try again.