TYT Cenk on Israel offensive

ShaneEnochs

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
4,298


While I don't think the UN is the solution, I like that he's calling out Israel and basically saying that the US is Israel's bitch.

EDIT - sorry, I don't know how this got posted in Grassroots. Could a mod move it for me?
 
Right here Cenk exposes that the US government is owned by Israel
When Palestinians strike it's Terrorism, when Israel strikes, it's collateral damage... and the US says, YEA!

Want another analogy? Israel has over 5 times as many UN violations/resolutions accused on it than the entire reign of Libya's Mommar Qaddafi. When CIA-Mossad fabricated and backed NTC Terrorists attacked the Libyan government in strategic locations and Qaddafi struck back, Qaddafi was the Bad Guy. When the World's largest Concentration Camp (GAZA) is struck by Israeli Drones and War Planes, and children are killed, the Palestinians are the Bad Guys.

This is how the New World Order works.
 
Last edited:
It's my understanding that the rockets launched from Gaza aren't meant to hit specific targets; if that's the case then it is terrorism. It's also my understanding that when Israel launches a strike it is against specific targets, ie. missile warehouse, enemy combatant, rocket launch sites. Where am I wrong?
 
images


On sale at your friendly IDF military surplus store.
 
It's my understanding that the rockets launched from Gaza aren't meant to hit specific targets; if that's the case then it is terrorism. It's also my understanding that when Israel launches a strike it is against specific targets, ie. missile warehouse, enemy combatant, rocket launch sites. Where am I wrong?

If I strap a bomb to my body and walk into a crowded mall, is that terrorism? Whether or not someone has a target doesn't have anything to do with if it is terrorism. The fact that they're not targeting the military or military facilities makes it terrorism.
 
It's my understanding that the rockets launched from Gaza aren't meant to hit specific targets; if that's the case then it is terrorism. It's also my understanding that when Israel launches a strike it is against specific targets, ie. missile warehouse, enemy combatant, rocket launch sites. Where am I wrong?

So all the "terrorists" have to do is to say they are aiming for military targets and assert that they just have bad aim and then it's not terrorism?

 
Israel has killed 20 - 30 Palestinians per Israeli killed.
Israel has imprisoned 1000's of Palestinians per Israeli captured.
Israel has stolen land. Period. Israel refuses to stop building settlements.
Israel refuses statehood so it can continue to assassinate elected leaders on a whim.
Death to Israel.
 
Looking back at my post, I wasn't very clear at all. I was addressing Hollywood's point that somehow calling an act for what it is, means the US is owned by Israel. The rocket attacks are acts of terror and recognizing that their sole purpose is to create terror - not to hit a military target (I should have specified in my op) - is not some admission that the US is owned by Israel.
 
I know it's unpopular here, but I side with Israel in these disputes. That's Israel's land. They continually get attacked by racists. Israel isn't the instigator. If people stopped blowing themselves up and attacking Israel, there would be no retaliation. Does anyone really believe that Israel is going out of its way to take over the Middle East?

That said, I really don't want the US entangling in these conflicts.
 
Looking back at my post, I wasn't very clear at all. I was addressing Hollywood's point that somehow calling an act for what it is, means the US is owned by Israel. The rocket attacks are acts of terror and recognizing that their sole purpose is to create terror - not to hit a military target (I should have specified in my op) - is not some admission that the US is owned by Israel.
Reflecting what most know the actions of Israel, the US has VETOED every single UN resolution against Israel no matter how heinous the crimes, the same crimes that has gotten leaders and their governments of foreign nations assassinated. The last UN resolution was to create a state of Palestine, which was voted My statement holds water of prior Israeli and US government respective actions, but the statement is to reflect Cenk's quote of
When Palestinians strike it's Terrorism, when Israel strikes, it's collateral damage... and the US says, YEA!

When the US Vetos Paletinian Statehood 14-1 and has Dennis Ross (founder of AIPAC) as the chief envoy... oh well
US Veto stats:
http://multipletext.com/2012/2-america_vetoes_1.html
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html
 
Last edited:
I know it's unpopular here, but I side with Israel in these disputes. That's Israel's land. They continually get attacked by racists. Israel isn't the instigator. If people stopped blowing themselves up and attacking Israel, there would be no retaliation. Does anyone really believe that Israel is going out of its way to take over the Middle East?

That said, I really don't want the US entangling in these conflicts.

How do you justify the settlements and this:

images


??
 
I know it's unpopular here, but I side with Israel in these disputes. That's Israel's land. They continually get attacked by racists. Israel isn't the instigator. If people stopped blowing themselves up and attacking Israel, there would be no retaliation. Does anyone really believe that Israel is going out of its way to take over the Middle East?

That said, I really don't want the US entangling in these conflicts.

No, it isn't. That land was given to the Rothschild Dynasty after WW2 as payment for the UK honoring the Balfour Declaration. Then it was settled by people who haven't a drop of semitic blood in their veins.
 
No, it isn't. That land was given to the Rothschild Dynasty after WW2 as payment for the UK honoring the Balfour Declaration. Then it was settled by people who haven't a drop of semitic blood in their veins.
Yes indeed, League of Nations and the Balfour Declaration... where it all started.
 
How do you justify the settlements and this:

images


??

Continuous wars against Israel. Most of the land the so called Palestinians lost was due to the six day war when Israel had to face all the Arab countries against them. Then they had intifada against Israel, then again they lost the lands.

I would have supported the Palestinian cause if it was a political cause but its 99% religious cause.
 
androidappme is a troll. A very active troll today. Maybe he'll run into Mini-Me or Pcosmar and get his history straightened out.
 
Continuous wars against Israel. Most of the land the so called Palestinians lost was due to the six day war when Israel had to face all the Arab countries against them. Then they had intifada against Israel, then again they lost the lands.

I would have supported the Palestinian cause if it was a political cause but its 99% religious cause.

The six day war was Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria wasn't it? How does that give Israel any (so called, what?) Palestinian land? Zionists brew up conflicts so that it can justify occupation of more land (& landscape in a broader sense). The state of Israel is only a tool.

edit: And has nothing to do with blood (as in ancestry)
 
Last edited:
The six day war was Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria wasn't it? How does that give Israel any (so called, what?) Palestinian land? Zionists brew up conflicts so that it can justify occupation of more land (& landscape in a broader sense). The state of Israel is only a tool.

edit: And has nothing to do with blood (as in ancestry)

Where did you get this teaching? Can you please tell me where did you first hear it and from whom?
 
Back
Top