The libertarian movement is much larger now than, say, 10 years ago.
A record setting turnout for the LP would be help it continue to grow.
*** Ron Paul was popular, somewhat. The libertarians, for being around since 1970, aren't being successful. Ron Paul was popular because he was pissed off about all the sucking everywhere. Many said "I, too, am pissed off about the sucking, I'll buy on, for now, with whatever solutions that guy who hates all the sucking is coming up with." Many, however, understand that piecemeal "libertarian" solutions, which are usually things that business wants and the GOP wants to give to business, but the GOP knows that the people don't like, so they let the libertarians take credit for, aren't going to fix anything in suckfest 2016.
It doesn't matter, especially this year when a huge number of registered GOPers hate their own nominee as much as Libertarians do.
*** More people hate Hillary more than people hate Trump.
And Trump has supported every one of them, and praised her performance as Sec. of State.
*** Well, when the worst thing you can say about the candidate is that he doesn't hate the opponent enough, that's a good reason to vote for the candidate. And, seriously, during and before Primary season, I ruled Trump out because he gave money to Clinton. But, now, it's a new ballgame. Yes, Trumps judgment in donating to Clinton is bad. But that doesn't make him as bad as the awful person he contributed to. Clinton is so awful that I'd rule someone out in the Primaries just for contributing to her. That is a very high level of awful.
He also, just 2 days ago, criticized her performance. So, it's unclear what his actual feelings on the matter are. You're assuming that his most recent comments, his core message, is the lie. That's not necessarily accurate. Are you taking the position that you have unique insight into Trump - that you can tell which of the things he says are lies and which are not? There is a lot of guessing with Trump. We really don't know what he'd do. But Clinton has 24 years of pig garbage record, and Trump would have to try really really hard to match Hillary's level of filth disgusting.
Nope, you'll get exactly the same foreign policy.
*** Oh, maybe, maybe not. I mean, I read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, so I'm not going to disagree with you. Endless, pointless wars for Israel, with no benefit to the US whatsoever foreever seems to have been someone's plan over 100 years ago, based on the age of whatever that thing actually is.
I already have, ad nauseum.
*** Yeah, but you won't now. Because you're wrong. You work for the DNC? And the next sentence isn't that Trump would be worse, but that they'd be the same.
I think that if the alternative is her long time friend and ideological ally Donald Trump, it makes no difference.
*** You sure are passionate and spend a lot of time on an issue that "makes no difference"
Hillary is a disgusting pig, who probably should've been in jail a long time ago, and if the policies are the same, which they could be, because Trump isn't a politician, and doesn't have a voting record, at least Trump isn't a disgusting pig.
I didn't vote for Trump in the primary. I sent money to Rand. But, again, Hillary = scum of the earth, and you should know that.
