Madison320
Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 6,036
Did you get lost again?![]()
???
Did you get lost again?![]()
I don't agree with Ron Paul on open borders. On this issue i agree with the likes of Pat Buchanan and Trump.
I don't agree with Ron Paul on open borders. On this issue i agree with the likes of Pat Buchanan and Trump.
LOL. Didn't you know, they are the best and brightest. They do the work that Americans are too stupid to do.
Liberty?Ron Paul is not for open borders either, except in a theoretical environment.
If most of the people getting advanced degrees in these fields are foreigners.......?
Liberty?
Any Austrian economist will tell you that hiring lower cost workers is good for productivity and good for the economy. It sucks for the worker but it's good for the consumers. That's the side of the equation you're leaving out.
It's the same logic as automation. Lower cost machines replace higher cost labor. Yes it sucks temporarily for the worker until he finds a new job, but he didn't have a right to it.
We have been out gunning and oiling Russia, and the cold war looms on. We're producing more oil then we have ever in 50 years.Americans work in sales, marketing and product management. Nobody makes anything.![]()
The side of the equation you are leaving out is that American consumers, who used to have good paying middle class jobs, can no longer afford to buy things because they were fired by greedy businesses importing low wage foreign labor or because their wages have been driven down by the oversupply of foreign labor. Keeping it in the country keeps the supply/demand in balance. Oversupplying labor as our country has done since the 1990s if not before drives down wages and destroys the middle class.
Automation _creates_ good new jobs for Americans: and it drives up living standards. Unfettered immigration drives down living standards in a race to the bottom. The two are completely opposite in the final effect on the living standards of Americans.
There may be some advanced fields where a small number of H1b visas would be appropriate -- where employers definitely are unable to find Americans that can do that work; but in most cases I disagree with screwing highly skilled competent Americans by hiring low-wage foreigners that are simply willing to live 5 families to an apartment and work 80 hours a week and get paid for 40.
It's really no use arguing about it. Nothing will change my mind and nothing will change yours. Please, let's just leave it at that.
We have been out gunning and oiling Russia, and the cold war looms on. We're producing more oil then we have ever in 50 years.
The side of the equation you are leaving out is that American consumers, who used to have good paying middle class jobs, can no longer afford to buy things because they were fired by greedy businesses importing low wage foreign labor or because their wages have been driven down by the oversupply of foreign labor.
Yep, Henry Ford paid his workers well for a reason.
Keynesian 101. Using your logic we can fix the problem by making the minimum wage $100 an hour.
Keynesian 101. Using your logic we can fix the problem by making the minimum wage $100 an hour.
H1b's are just a symptom of government subsidizing our tech industry. Tech companies pushed for the handouts for the cheap labor and because labor was hard to find in certain industries so it kept those industries in those communities. It's not your fault being a nerd wasn't cool when the tech industry needed a bunch of talent. I don't see government subsidizes going away but they might shift the money around I guess.Totally agree. We should send some H1Bs your way.![]()
Americans work in sales, marketing and product management. Nobody makes anything.![]()
The government is oversupplying labor. Is this simple enough?![]()
So when you buy a cheap avocado from Mexico, the government is oversupplying avocados?