Trump Threatens Riots if He's Not the Nominee

I was referring to the quoted text in the OP:
^ He "thinks" there would be riots. I also think there would be riots, because that's a no-brainer... But that's not a "threat", it's just an easy prediction to make based on an obvious consequence of the disillusionment of millions of passionate people.

right, and he said he would not lead it or encourages it.

His crime is for mentioning the obvious. And some of these posters will soon join
"democratic spring", the new communist occupy movement. They did it before on
ron paul boards. nothing new.
 
right, and he said he would not lead it or encourages it.

His crime is for mentioning the obvious. And some of these posters will soon join
"democratic spring", the new communist occupy movement. They did it before on
ron paul boards. nothing new.

yeah, I realized that I misunderstood, already deleted that post before I read this response...

I agree.
 
Last edited:
Trump is a representation of average american. All the people $#@! talking trump are really $#@! talking the silent majority. That will only drive them closer to Trump.

Whether I agree with him or not does not matter. I think he deserves to win just because he is speaking for the majority. And don't be mistaken most people think like him. He is not stupid he might not necessarily hold all the positions he is running on. What he is saying more than 5 out of 10 people around you are thinking.
Nope he has not won the majority of the republican voters yet. Until he does that and wins the full majority of delegates he IS NOT THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE or the majority.
 
Trumps announcement speech:


Racism:


His words.


Inciting violence ?



HIS WORDS.

Over and out.


Is this a joke? First off, Mexico is not a race, it is a country you lunkhead, second, what he said is true, crying "racist" is just your pathetic attempt to hide the fact that you can't prove it's false.

As to his "inciting violence", oh, I guess it's OK now to trespass at an event someone else paid for and throw tomatoes at people? Yeah, I'd say "knock the crap out of them" is quite appropriate.

Theories of Supervisory Liability . . . vicarious liability, gross negligence, reckless indifference . . . cops often the culprit in relief sought . . .

But you asked about who judges Trump's crimes in inciting riot . . . so you are clear on your question of who Duhnald's judges will be ?

What's funny to me is how you actually think you're making a point, this is too funny, we got the "Truth and Safety Commission" out there now, won't be long before "hate speech" laws are in place. Yeah, I'm so confident in the impartiality of the system when it comes to deciding what is deemed "inciting a riot". Like I say, you guys are a joke.
 
Last edited:
No, they would still blame him. They have zero integrity and the words that he speaks will be twisted and taken out of context as always, as to them truth is irrelevant. This OP is a great example. Trump didn't "threaten" anything.

Yep, once again these guys are trying so desperately to hide these facts, as if the media will just back off if only he would say "Be nice folks", I swear it is just unreal the level of hatred some of these people here have for Trump, I mean there is simply no principle they won't completely disregard as long as it's Trump, I'm guessing most of them were the dorky kid in school who got beat up by the jocks every day, they see that jocks face when they look at Trump.
 
Yep, once again these guys are trying so desperately to hide these facts, as if the media will just back off if only he would say "Be nice folks", I swear it is just unreal the level of hatred some of these people here have for Trump, I mean there is simply no principle they won't completely disregard as long as it's Trump, I'm guessing most of them were the dorky kid in school who got beat up by the jocks every day, they see that jocks face when they look at Trump.

This one is a nasty little guy.
 
Good. GOP insiders are throwing a fit everyday about how they decide the nominee and how badly they want to disregard everyone's votes. If the electoral process is openly rigged, what's the point of playing nice anymore? Trump should personally throw the first punch if they screw him over.
 
Good. GOP insiders are throwing a fit everyday about how they decide the nominee and how badly they want to disregard everyone's votes. If the electoral process is openly rigged, what's the point of playing nice anymore? Trump should personally throw the first punch if they screw him over.

He's not talking about what will happen if he gets screwed over. He wants them to give him the nomination if he goes in there with a plurality; he's saying if they don't do that, his people will riot.
 
Is this a joke? First off, Mexico is not a race, it is a country you lunkhead, second, what he said is true, crying "racist" is just your pathetic attempt to hide the fact that you can't prove it's false.
No it's not a joke, you are the joke.

Mexicans don't have to be a race in order for Trump to be a racist. He also mentioned muslims as a race. Now I really don't think a lack of logic would preclude someone from being a racist. In fact, I think it's a likely attribute. As far as the latter part of that statement, it doesn't make logical sense.

As to his "inciting violence", oh, I guess it's OK now to trespass at an event someone else paid for and throw tomatoes at people? Yeah, I'd say "knock the crap out of them" is quite appropriate.
People shouldn't trespass. People also shouldn't call to knock the crap out of others. Especially if they are running for president.


Now please go some place where you'll find more likeminded people. I frankly don't feel like hanging around too many racists and or racist apologists.
 
Nope he has not won the majority of the republican voters yet. Until he does that and wins the full majority of delegates he IS NOT THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE or the majority.

I'm just stating my opinion. If he becomes president I will be proven right. So we will see.

Edit: honestly I dont care about people screaming racist or violence. So tired of listening of this shit that I could not care less.
 
Last edited:
right, and he said he would not lead it or encourages it.

His crime is for mentioning the obvious. And some of these posters will soon join
"democratic spring", the new communist occupy movement. They did it before on
ron paul boards. nothing new.

"Trump says" is like diarrhea of the mouth . . .
he has encouraged violence at events repeatedly - offering to pay legal expenses even, and then gets called out by no less than Bernie
for making those legal expense offers, making The Bern look classy compared to Trump.

Any GOP Senators up for re-election - and all the Congressman up for a new 2-year term - should be very careful about endorsing "The Don" . . .
some are safe regardless, but there will be others in closer races, and those that endorse the Piece of Chit might find themselves on the giant mudslide Trumpie has created for the entire GOP - maybe some L's can get elected.

Trump has assured us all of Obama 3.0, as Duhnald and Bill Clinton discussed before he entered the race 9 months ago,
and it has now worked out so well that the GOP will be certain to lose some seats in Congress in the upcoming Democrat autumn.

Colorado will re-elect it's Democrat Senator now, along with Trump's electoral college map looking like a barren tundra without
California, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Iowa, Nevada, and Colorado.

Hillary and First Lady Bill send thanks to all you trumpettes.
 
The same Trump supporters would be against a riot by blacks (and they should be)
But would be in full agreement for a riot if he doesnt receive the nomination.

This is how the mind of an irrational and uninformed voter works.
 
It seemed, to me, more like a conjecture or plausibility, than a threat. Though I can certainly understand using the word "threat" (if not any too concerned with truth or accuracy) because it's more ominous, scary and dramatic. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! :p
 
Back
Top