Trump Threatens Riots if He's Not the Nominee

When you can quoted Ron Paul inciting violence, let us all know.

When you can define what "inciting violence means" and show where Trump met that definition let me know. I remember people freaking out about Ron using the term "Revolution", but I guess that was different right? Well, plenty of his enemies used it anyway, didn't a few RP people get investigated by DHS and FBI, hmmmmmm, didn't some people throw snowballs at a certain broadcaster? Didn't a reporter get stomped at a Rand rally?
 
Got youtube ?

Be careful. Next he's going to ask you to do all the research for him and find every single video on Youtube displaying such actions. When you do he'll completely disregard it and not even look at what you've presented, and likely change the subject. If you decide to refuse his pointless request, he'll accuse you of all sorts of things, none of which have anything to do with what we're actually talking about.

All because he can't complete a simple google search himself.

Just a heads up.
 
When you can define what "inciting violence means" and show where Trump met that definition let me know. I remember people freaking out about Ron using the term "Revolution", but I guess that was different right? Well, plenty of his enemies used it anyway, didn't a few RP people get investigated by DHS and FBI, hmmmmmm, didn't some people throw snowballs at a certain broadcaster? Didn't a reporter get stomped at a Rand rally?

How about the definitions used in a Federal Court ?
 
So where's your evidence that Trump is racist, inciting riots, all that? Oh, media stories? You guys get more absurd with each post, you just have no ground to stand on and you know it, and you accuse me of weak logic.

Trumps announcement speech:
“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists… And some, I assume, are good people.”

Racism:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior

His words.


Inciting violence ?



HIS WORDS.

Over and out.
 
Federal Judge? Oh, so now not only is the media valid, but federal judges, what's next, you guys gonna start agreeing with cops?

Theories of Supervisory Liability . . . vicarious liability, gross negligence, reckless indifference . . . cops often the culprit in relief sought . . .

But you asked about who judges Trump's crimes in inciting riot . . . so you are clear on your question of who Duhnald's judges will be ?
 
That's not a "threat," CPUd. This is a threat:

Top Black Lives Matter Activist: ‘We Will Incite Riots Everywhere if Trump Wins’
http://www.theburningplatform.com/2...e-will-incite-riots-everywhere-if-trump-wins/

I'll leave it to CPUd to start a thread about it.

Too late. now it's ''we're going to start riots everywhere before Trump wins''.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...est-civil-disobedience-action-of-the-century/

With little fanfare and almost no news media attention, some of the same radical groups involved in shutting down Donald Trump’s Chicago rally last week are plotting a mass civil disobedience movement to begin next month.

They intend to march across the East Coast in order to spark a “fire that transforms the political climate in America.”

The operation, calling itself Democracy Spring, is threatening “drama in Washington” with the “largest civil disobedience action of the century.” The radicals believe this will result in the arrest of thousands of their own activists.

The communists don't give up power easily.
 
Last edited:
About 100,000 signatures to the White House can prompt a petition to be passed on to the Department of Justice (?)

'It has to stop': Obama blames campaign-trail rhetoric for violence at Donald Trump rallies
"...it has to stop."

He made the statement not to be politically correct, he said, but to shed light on how "corrosive behavior" undermined
"our democracy and our society and even our economy."
"This is also about the American brand," he said.

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-donald-trump-rally-violence-2016-3
 
What Trump should say afterwards is that he does not want people to riot and he should encourage his supporters not to. This way he won't be inciting or be blamed for inciting any riots if they were to occur.
 
What Trump should say afterwards is that he does not want people to riot and he should encourage his supporters not to. This way he won't be inciting or be blamed for inciting any riots if they were to occur.

Trump has already said . . . "It's Bernie people" . . . "Get your people in line Bernie"
 
You say that as if libertarians are supposed to support Trump. Why are you here anyways? Are you done with your lies like there was shootings and fires and looting by those protesters? More lies from the Trump propaganda station.

Rand drove lots of libertarians out. Hope everyone's happy. Hope Rand is proud.

“I’m not advocating everyone go out and run around with no clothes on and smoke pot-I’m not a libertarian. I’m a libertarian Republican. I’m a constitutional conservative.” Rand Paul

Ron was a statesman, (until around 2011) Rand is a TWIT

Rand Paul Is Not A Libertarian
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/04/06/3643093/rand-paul-not-libertarian/

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU that wanted "truthers" and "peacenicks" and "libertarians" out has almost got exactly what you wanted. You should have been careful what you wished for. This is now a board for the Paul Family Cult. Complete with kool aid and a mob of angry cultists.

NO MORE PAULS

And for the record- CRUZ is, besides being a scummy sleazy warmongering liar, not eligible to be president. But the Republicans don't care about the constitution unless they're pandering for votes. How much did Ron and Jesse get for endorsing the Canadian Jackass Liar?

This place once cared about Ron's message from the last 40 years. It was a bastion of integrity and hope.

How much lower can you go. I can't even bear to come here anymore usually. Can't wait to leave the US actually. Have fun
 
Rand drove lots of libertarians out. Hope everyone's happy. Hope Rand is proud.

“I’m not advocating everyone go out and run around with no clothes on and smoke pot-I’m not a libertarian. I’m a libertarian Republican. I’m a constitutional conservative.” Rand Paul

Ron was a statesman, (until around 2011) Rand is a TWIT

Rand Paul Is Not A Libertarian
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/04/06/3643093/rand-paul-not-libertarian/

Just curious, are you the type of "libertarian" who can't stand Rand for trying to bridge the gap? You sound like a purist to me. Rand is the most libertarian Senator we've had in 100 years, so to bitch and moan about him not being libertarian enough is pretty silly. We also have those "libertarians" who hate Rand because he hasn't been pure enough but love Trump. Is that you?

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU that wanted "truthers" and "peacenicks" and "libertarians" out has almost got exactly what you wanted. You should have been careful what you wished for. This is now a board for the Paul Family Cult. Complete with kool aid and a mob of angry cultists.

NO MORE PAULS

Now I'm getting really confused. Does your post have anything to do with what you quoted or what the topic of this thread is? The only "cultists" around here are the Tumpkins. Most of us here have supported many liberty candidates, not just the Paul family. It just so happened that Rand Paul was the best chance option libertarians had this cycle.

And for the record- CRUZ is, besides being a scummy sleazy warmongering liar, not eligible to be president. But the Republicans don't care about the constitution unless they're pandering for votes.
No argument there.

How much did Ron and Jesse get for endorsing the Canadian Jackass Liar?
You should have some proof if you are going to make an assertion like that. I donated a lot of money to Cruz's Senate campaign and was relatively happy with that investment until the last year or so. Now I regret it. Does that mean I had ulterior motives in my support of him? Cruz ran a convincing campaign as an option that represented more liberty than his opponent(s). Sometimes it takes some time for the truth to emerge. Maybe we should run every candidate by you, because apparently you can tell right from the start who is trustworthy enough to endorse.
 
What Trump should say afterwards is that he does not want people to riot and he should encourage his supporters not to. This way he won't be inciting or be blamed for inciting any riots if they were to occur.

No, they would still blame him. They have zero integrity and the words that he speaks will be twisted and taken out of context as always, as to them truth is irrelevant. This OP is a great example. Trump didn't "threaten" anything.
 
No, they would still blame him. They have zero integrity and the words that he speaks will be twisted and taken out of context as always, as to them truth is irrelevant. This OP is a great example. Trump didn't "threaten" anything.

Said the exact opposite if you listened to it.
 
Guys, I hate to rain all over everybody's circle-spinning parade, but this thing is over as far as the presidential election goes. Cruz does not have a prayer in any of these bigger states that are coming down the road, be it California, New York, or my own state of Pennsylvania. If Cruz had locked up the southeast like I thought he would instead of getting clobbered by Trump there and having to rely on the sparsely populated "heartland" to keep his head above water, it might have been a different story. This is the year of the demagogue, and I'm at peace with that, just as I was at peace with it in every other presidential election since I've been old enough to vote.

So some are saying that Trump intends to incite riots? Even if I accept this premise, it's not like that crap hasn't already been happening in the past couple years in all of these dilapidated urban areas that are steeped with gangs and human garbage. I don't see any point in getting in a twist over this, especially considering that not only Trump's competition, but almost the entire media is just as bad as him.

The "people" have spoken once again, and they will once again be punished. Excuse me while I heed the words of the follow snorg-tee.

lifegiveslemons_fullpic_artwork.jpg
 
Trump is a representation of average american. All the people shit talking trump are really shit talking the silent majority. That will only drive them closer to Trump.

Whether I agree with him or not does not matter. I think he deserves to win just because he is speaking for the majority. And don't be mistaken most people think like him. He is not stupid he might not necessarily hold all the positions he is running on. What he is saying more than 5 out of 10 people around you are thinking.
 
So some are saying that Trump intends to incite riots? Even if I accept this premise, it's not like that crap hasn't already been happening in the past couple years in all of these dilapidated urban areas that are steeped with gangs and human garbage. I don't see any point in getting in a twist over this, especially considering that not only Trump's competition, but almost the entire media is just as bad as him.

yep, not new. same people too.
 
Back
Top