I was referring to the quoted text in the OP:
^ He "thinks" there would be riots. I also think there would be riots, because that's a no-brainer... But that's not a "threat", it's just an easy prediction to make based on an obvious consequence of the disillusionment of millions of passionate people.
right, and he said he would not lead it or encourages it.
His crime is for mentioning the obvious. And some of these posters will soon join
"democratic spring", the new communist occupy movement. They did it before on
ron paul boards. nothing new.
You say that as if libertarians are supposed to support Trump. Why are you here anyways?
Nope he has not won the majority of the republican voters yet. Until he does that and wins the full majority of delegates he IS NOT THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE or the majority.Trump is a representation of average american. All the people $#@! talking trump are really $#@! talking the silent majority. That will only drive them closer to Trump.
Whether I agree with him or not does not matter. I think he deserves to win just because he is speaking for the majority. And don't be mistaken most people think like him. He is not stupid he might not necessarily hold all the positions he is running on. What he is saying more than 5 out of 10 people around you are thinking.
Trumps announcement speech:
Racism:
His words.
Inciting violence ?
HIS WORDS.
Over and out.
Theories of Supervisory Liability . . . vicarious liability, gross negligence, reckless indifference . . . cops often the culprit in relief sought . . .
But you asked about who judges Trump's crimes in inciting riot . . . so you are clear on your question of who Duhnald's judges will be ?
No, they would still blame him. They have zero integrity and the words that he speaks will be twisted and taken out of context as always, as to them truth is irrelevant. This OP is a great example. Trump didn't "threaten" anything.
Yep, once again these guys are trying so desperately to hide these facts, as if the media will just back off if only he would say "Be nice folks", I swear it is just unreal the level of hatred some of these people here have for Trump, I mean there is simply no principle they won't completely disregard as long as it's Trump, I'm guessing most of them were the dorky kid in school who got beat up by the jocks every day, they see that jocks face when they look at Trump.
Good. GOP insiders are throwing a fit everyday about how they decide the nominee and how badly they want to disregard everyone's votes. If the electoral process is openly rigged, what's the point of playing nice anymore? Trump should personally throw the first punch if they screw him over.
No it's not a joke, you are the joke.Is this a joke? First off, Mexico is not a race, it is a country you lunkhead, second, what he said is true, crying "racist" is just your pathetic attempt to hide the fact that you can't prove it's false.
People shouldn't trespass. People also shouldn't call to knock the crap out of others. Especially if they are running for president.As to his "inciting violence", oh, I guess it's OK now to trespass at an event someone else paid for and throw tomatoes at people? Yeah, I'd say "knock the crap out of them" is quite appropriate.
Nope he has not won the majority of the republican voters yet. Until he does that and wins the full majority of delegates he IS NOT THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE or the majority.
right, and he said he would not lead it or encourages it.
His crime is for mentioning the obvious. And some of these posters will soon join
"democratic spring", the new communist occupy movement. They did it before on
ron paul boards. nothing new.
Mexicans don't have to be a race in order for Trump to be a racist. He also mentioned muslims as a race. .
Words have meaning.