Trump Pushes Back Against Neocon Plan to Invade Syria

[Pizzo]

Ron Paul didn't have a majority of Delegates you dummy. Ron Paul didn't fight in the press like Trump did to avoid his nomination being stealed from him. Ron Paul wasn't a fighter loved by rednecks on reddit ready to take arms to support him. I guess you are a very bad chess player. You don't know how to compare.

Fucking hilarious.

 

[TheCount]

Go out and get some sun, dude- I think you need a break from the Donald-Love.

It may be some kind of contact high from all of the tanning spray.

 

[Athan]

[/LEFT]
https://www.infowars.com/trump-pushes-back-against-neo-con-plan-to-invade-syria/

Sorry Danno, Steve Pieczenik already spoke about this tactic. It is intentionally meant to confuse people having one person say something and have another say something else. He said the admin will be going to war. He did somewhat imply that the intelligence community may have something up their sleeve in response to Trump's action though.

 

[Philmanoman]

danno,mordan (aka moron) and silverhandhorde are by far the biggest idiots on this site.

Maybe someone could make a collection of their best posts...and we could laugh our asses off.

 

[Philmanoman]

Good. Grief.

You sure like to ASSume, dannno.

You're calling ME a shill when YOU have been THE primary Trump supporter here, while all the time denying it.

Go out and get some sun, dude- I think you need a break from the Donald-Love.

He might want to stay out of the sun.
I think it may have turned his brain into a California raisin.

 

[dannno]

Good. Grief.

You sure like to ASSume, dannno.

You're calling ME a shill when YOU have been THE primary Trump supporter here, while all the time denying it.

Go out and get some sun, dude- I think you need a break from the Donald-Love.

I didn't call you a shill in that post..I said you promote and defend shills for the deep state.

 

[dannno]

Sorry Danno, Steve Pieczenik already spoke about this tactic. It is intentionally meant to confuse people having one person say something and have another say something else. He said the admin will be going to war. He did somewhat imply that the intelligence community may have something up their sleeve in response to Trump's action though.

Did you miss Donald Trump's interview on Fox yesterday when he said we aren't going into Syria?

 

[nikcers]

Did you miss Donald Trump's interview on Fox yesterday when he said we aren't going into Syria?

[h=3]Tillerson Warns Russia on Syria, Saying Assad Era Is ‘Coming to an End’[/h]

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Did you miss Donald Trump's interview on Fox yesterday when he said we aren't going into Syria?

Those aren't even words.

 

[Ender]

I didn't call you a shill in that post..I said you promote and defend shills for the deep state.

I would say that would be Trump supporters.

JMHPOV

 

[Athan]

Did you miss Donald Trump's interview on Fox yesterday when he said we aren't going into Syria?

YES.

This is exactly what I was commenting about. One hand saying one thing (Trump) and the other hand saying another (McMasturbator) was a tactic observed by Steve Pieczenik. He stated because it was intentionally meant to confuse the public, they are likely going to war. There are US troops in Syria now, two armored columns were reported by VARIOUS sources one being the youtuber "Syrian Girl" as well as Jordanian aircraft.

 

[CPUd]

 

[TheCount]

Did you miss Donald Trump's interview on Fox yesterday when he said we aren't going into Syria?

But isn't your new argument that Trump is some kind of gullible, easily manipulated, naive moron? If so, why would we listen to his words instead of the words of the people who are apparently actually making the decisions in the executive branch?

I'll hold out for Ivanka's interview to see what the future holds.

 

[dannno]

But isn't your new argument that Trump is some kind of gullible, easily manipulated, naive moron? .

No?

 

[undergroundrr]

I would say that would be Trump supporters.

JMHPOV

Mine too. trump is a nutrient-packed green smoothie infused with omega 3's for the Deep State.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

But isn't your new argument that Trump is some kind of gullible, easily manipulated, naive moron? If so, why would we listen to his words instead of the words of the people who are apparently actually making the decisions in the executive branch?

I'll hold out for Ivanka's interview to see what the future holds.

You just said they are bad communicators. You can't even get your spinning straight on here.

Anyway, I asked you a question earlier that you did not answer. You always harp on who you don't like. How about discussing who you do like? Or what you like? Or what you stand for? Are you going to do that? Are you willing to have a conversation? I have asked you this several times. Do you want to debate/discuss?

 

[TheCount]

No?

What else besides a moron would you call a person who - according to you - appointed a bunch of bad people to be his advisers so that they could give him bad advice so that then he could fire them... and then forgets his plan, ends up taking their bad advice instead, and spends $100 million attacking a foreign country based on this known-bad advice?

 

[Indy Vidual]

Trump used to say the POTUS cannot attack Syria without consulting congress, what happened?

If you can't see the deep state is against Trump, then you are the one who has reality issues....

Dannno, why would the "deep state" be against a useful tool like The Donald?

All laughter aside, I feel sorry for the millions who suffer from endless wars.

 

[dannno]

What else besides a moron would you call a person who - according to you - appointed a bunch of bad people to be his advisers so that they could give him bad advice so that then he could fire them... and then forgets his plan, ends up taking their bad advice instead, and spends $100 million attacking a foreign country based on this known-bad advice?

The attack on the Syrian air base was extremely effective at achieving multiple objectives, the vast majority of which had absolutely nothing to do with Syria. I don't support it, although the damage was minimal, but it achieved numerous objectives that may help lead to world peace as well as helping advance Trump against the deep state so I won't own the decision but the outcome is undeniable.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Access Hollywood Tape played in loop for 1 week. Because kick him out of the debates would be too obvious.

I just owned your petty argument. You are a tool. A shill paid to spread FUD.

Not worth much answering you, even less reading your drivel

The election is over. Time to focus on issues, and return to a more normal and civil environment. Thanks.

Guidelines:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content.php?1989

Community Values
As a community:
We value independent thought, critical thinking and logical arguments that provide unique insight.
We value a plethora of viewpoints. All are welcomed except those based on negativity in collectivist mindsets that view humans as members of groups rather than as individuals. Sexism, racism and anti-semitism are the antithesis of our values.
We value the sharing of news and information relevant to our Mission.
We value the development of wisdom though a high level of community discourse.
We value a focus on debating issues while being civil, on-topic and avoiding personal commentary on other members.
We value an understanding that name-calling of any person or group proves nothing and has no worthy intellectual foundation.
We value efforts and attitudes that build fellowship and an effective community. We encourage the personal development, success and individual enrichment of our members, as well as the welcoming of new members.
We value efforts to achieve success within our Mission.





Community Guidelines
In order to effectively achieve our Mission the site's Community Guidelines must be followed, which apply to forum posts, reputation comments, blogs, private messages and all other forms of site content.


Critical Guidelines Focus
The following guidelines are of critical concern with little to no tolerance of deviation from the staff:

Operate within morally sound laws. Promoting violence, theft or other illegal activities will not be tolerated.
Respect others' copyrights, intellectual property and contracts, per legal standards. Limit fair-use posting of copyright material to the lesser of four paragraphs or a quarter of the writing.
Posts should not promote negativity in collectivist mindsets that view humans as members of groups rather than individuals. Such forms of collectivism include sexism, racism and anti-semitism; they will not be tolerated here.
No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users.
Do note disrupt Mission-supporting activism efforts.



The Community Guidelines are as follows:

1) Be ethical.
Be honest and truthful.
Operate within morally sound laws. Promoting violence, theft or other illegal activities will not be tolerated.
Respect others' copyrights, intellectual property and contracts, per legal standards. Limit fair-use posting of copyright material to the lesser of four paragraphs or a quarter of the writing.
Posts should not promote negativity in collectivist mindsets that view humans as members of groups rather than individuals. Such forms of collectivism include sexism, racism, anti-semitism; they will not be tolerated here.
Work to promote a peaceful, freedom-loving, compassionate society.


2) Treat others with respect.
Do not make accusations, declarations on others' character, question their motives, be judgmental, assign them to a group or make any other negative personal commentary of members.
No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users.
Do not suggest that other members should leave or that they otherwise don't belong here.
Do not publicly discuss which site members you don't like, who is on your ignore list or similar.
No misquoting other members when debating, such as with "fixed it for you."
Be respectful of others' religion or lack thereof.
No posting of anyone's personal contact information or members' personal details.
See the "Being Respectful" section below for more details.
...
Being Respectful
Maintaining a proper decorum is essential for any group, and is critically important for online political forums. Being respectful of others is an important part of that and required by the Community Guidelines. Here are some examples of being respectful vs. not:
"You're an idiot for thinking that." -- not respectful since the statement is based on an insult.
"Your delusional thinking" -- not respectful since your statement is based on an insult.
"Here are the problems with your line of thinking..." -- respectful, you don't have to agree and can present logical counter-arguments.
"Troll" -- calling other members a troll is not respectful and implies you know the intent of the member.
Religious context: See this special instructional thread.
...
Dealing with Conflict and Guideline Violations
If you see a problem with a specific post violating the guidelines you can report it to the site staff with the use of the report option grouped with that post.
If you see another member's behavior driving down the level of site discourse, not contained to a single message, you can report it to the site staff.

If you take issue with another member:

Do:
Debate the issues. Attack bad ideas and questionable information.
If a user keeps rehashing the same debate, call for a "Site Issue Evaluation" debate thread on the issues in accordance with our "Site Issue Evaluations - Managing Contentious Issues" policy. Message the staff for details if needed.
Put the user on your ignore list.


Don't:
Do not call other members names such as idiot, troll, liberal (unless self-labeled) or other names.
Do not antagonize other members by calling them out in thread titles.
Do not hunt down random posts by a user to apply negative reputation points.
Do not use PMs or rep messages as a backhanded way to break the guidelines.
Do not attempt to rally a negative campaign against the member.
Do not accuse others of violating the guidelines.
Do not retaliate if attacked; refocus the discussion to the topic, call for the discussion to be kept civil or do not respond.